Connectivity differences between inferior frontal gyrus and mentalizing network in autism as compared to developmental coordination disorder and non-autistic youth

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cortex Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.014
Aditya Jayashankar , Brittany Bynum , Christiana Butera , Emily Kilroy , Laura Harrison , Lisa Aziz-Zadeh
{"title":"Connectivity differences between inferior frontal gyrus and mentalizing network in autism as compared to developmental coordination disorder and non-autistic youth","authors":"Aditya Jayashankar ,&nbsp;Brittany Bynum ,&nbsp;Christiana Butera ,&nbsp;Emily Kilroy ,&nbsp;Laura Harrison ,&nbsp;Lisa Aziz-Zadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Prior studies have compared neural connectivity during mentalizing tasks in autism (ASD) to non-autistic individuals and found reduced connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and mentalizing regions. However, given that the IFG is involved in motor processing, and about 80% of autistic individuals have motor-related difficulties, it is necessary to explore if these differences are specific to ASD or instead similar across other developmental motor disorders, such as </span>developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Participants (29 ASD, 20 DCD, 31 typically developing [TD]; ages 8–17) completed a mentalizing task in the fMRI scanner, where they were asked to think about why someone was performing an action. Results indicated that the ASD group, as compared to both TD and DCD groups, showed significant </span>functional connectivity differences when mentalizing about other's actions. The left IFG seed revealed ASD connectivity differences with the: bilateral </span>temporoparietal junction<span> (TPJ), left insular cortex<span><span>, and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Connectivity differences using the right IFG seed revealed ASD differences in the: left </span>insula, and right DLPFC. These results indicate that connectivity differences between the IFG, mentalizing regions, emotion and motor processing regions are specific to ASD and not a result of potentially co-occurring motor differences.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"167 ","pages":"Pages 115-131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543516/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945223001776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prior studies have compared neural connectivity during mentalizing tasks in autism (ASD) to non-autistic individuals and found reduced connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and mentalizing regions. However, given that the IFG is involved in motor processing, and about 80% of autistic individuals have motor-related difficulties, it is necessary to explore if these differences are specific to ASD or instead similar across other developmental motor disorders, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Participants (29 ASD, 20 DCD, 31 typically developing [TD]; ages 8–17) completed a mentalizing task in the fMRI scanner, where they were asked to think about why someone was performing an action. Results indicated that the ASD group, as compared to both TD and DCD groups, showed significant functional connectivity differences when mentalizing about other's actions. The left IFG seed revealed ASD connectivity differences with the: bilateral temporoparietal junction (TPJ), left insular cortex, and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Connectivity differences using the right IFG seed revealed ASD differences in the: left insula, and right DLPFC. These results indicate that connectivity differences between the IFG, mentalizing regions, emotion and motor processing regions are specific to ASD and not a result of potentially co-occurring motor differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与发育协调障碍和非自闭症青年相比,自闭症患者额下回和精神化网络之间的连接差异。
先前的研究将自闭症(ASD)患者和非自闭症患者在心理化任务中的神经连接进行了比较,发现额下回(IFG)和心理化区域之间的连接减少。然而,考虑到IFG参与运动处理,并且大约80%的自闭症患者有运动相关的困难,有必要探索这些差异是ASD特有的,还是在其他发育性运动障碍中相似,如发育协调障碍(DCD)。参与者(29名ASD,20名DCD,31名通常发展为[TD];年龄8-17岁)在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中完成了一项心理化任务,要求他们思考为什么有人在做某个动作。结果表明,与TD和DCD组相比,ASD组在思考他人行为时表现出显著的功能连接差异。左侧IFG种子显示ASD与双侧颞顶叶交界处(TPJ)、左侧岛叶皮层和双侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的连接差异。使用右侧IFG种子的连接差异揭示了左岛叶和右侧DLPFC的ASD差异。这些结果表明,IFG、心理化区域、情绪和运动处理区域之间的连接差异是ASD特有的,而不是潜在的共同运动差异的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
期刊最新文献
Shared body representation constraints in human and non-human primates behavior Exploring the development of past and future episodic memory in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary longitudinal study Vertical neglect towards the lower space after bilateral parietal strokes – A case study Diminished sense of agency inhibits paretic upper-limb use in patients with post-stroke motor deficits EEG frequency tagging reveals the integration of dissimilar observed actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1