Performance and Strength Characteristics of Suture Knots in Periodontal Microsurgery: An In Vitro Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.11607/prd.6899
Alina Ariceta, Mirian Elizabeth Casco, Paula Kurlander, Francisca Forti, Antonion Camarano, Roberto Volfovicz, Hsun-Lian Chan, Diego Velásquez-Plata
{"title":"Performance and Strength Characteristics of Suture Knots in Periodontal Microsurgery: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Alina Ariceta, Mirian Elizabeth Casco, Paula Kurlander, Francisca Forti, Antonion Camarano, Roberto Volfovicz, Hsun-Lian Chan, Diego Velásquez-Plata","doi":"10.11607/prd.6899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study is aimed to investigate the types of knot failure (untying or breaking) and the tension required to break different sutures diameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty knots were fabricated using polyamide sutures diameters of 6/0, 7/0, and 8/0. The studied knots were either squared or slipped with different numbers of throws (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6), and the following data were recorded: type of failure (untied or broken), number of throws, the tension required to untie or break each knot, slippage, and elongation of the knot. The knots were created in a standardized way. with a device and weights and then subjected to a controlled tension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The knots that got untied were: 1&#61;1, 1x1, 2&#61;1, and 2x1, whereas the remaining knots got broken. Notably, at least three throws were required to prevent untying, but separately, as in 1&#61;1&#61;1 or 1x1x1. The mean tension to break the knots of 6/0, 7/0, and 8/0 sutures were 3.1, 1.3, and 0.6 N, respectively (P < 0.05), and they were independent of the knot type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from this study demonstrated that the knots with geometries of 2&#61;2/2x2 and 1&#61;1&#61;1/1x1x1 were secure, and additional throws does not increase their security. Furthermore, tensile strength reduces with decreased suture size.</p>","PeriodicalId":54948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study is aimed to investigate the types of knot failure (untying or breaking) and the tension required to break different sutures diameters.

Methods: One hundred and fifty knots were fabricated using polyamide sutures diameters of 6/0, 7/0, and 8/0. The studied knots were either squared or slipped with different numbers of throws (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6), and the following data were recorded: type of failure (untied or broken), number of throws, the tension required to untie or break each knot, slippage, and elongation of the knot. The knots were created in a standardized way. with a device and weights and then subjected to a controlled tension.

Results: The knots that got untied were: 1=1, 1x1, 2=1, and 2x1, whereas the remaining knots got broken. Notably, at least three throws were required to prevent untying, but separately, as in 1=1=1 or 1x1x1. The mean tension to break the knots of 6/0, 7/0, and 8/0 sutures were 3.1, 1.3, and 0.6 N, respectively (P < 0.05), and they were independent of the knot type.

Conclusion: Results from this study demonstrated that the knots with geometries of 2=2/2x2 and 1=1=1/1x1x1 were secure, and additional throws does not increase their security. Furthermore, tensile strength reduces with decreased suture size.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙周显微手术中缝合线结的性能和强度特征:体外研究
背景:本研究旨在探讨缝合线打结失败的类型(解结或断线)以及不同直径缝合线断线所需的张力:本研究旨在调查绳结失效的类型(松开或断开)以及断开不同直径缝合线所需的张力:使用直径分别为 6/0、7/0 和 8/0 的聚酰胺缝合线制作了 150 个绳结,这些绳结或呈方形,或以不同的打结次数(2、3、4、5 和 6)滑动,并记录了以下数据:失败类型(松开或断开)、打结次数、松开或断开每个绳结所需的张力、滑动以及绳结的伸长率。绳结是以标准化的方式用装置和砝码打出来的,然后受到可控的拉力:解开的绳结有结果:解开的绳结有:1=1、1x1、2=1 和 2x1。值得注意的是,至少需要三次抛掷才能防止绳结松开,但要分别进行,如 1=1=1 或 1x1x1。6/0、7/0 和 8/0 缝合线打结时的平均张力分别为 3.1、1.3 和 0.6 N(P < 0.05),且与线结类型无关:该研究结果表明,几何形状为 2=2/2x2 和 1=1=1/1x1x1 的结是安全的,额外的抛掷并不会增加其安全性。此外,拉伸强度会随着缝合线尺寸的减小而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry will publish manuscripts concerned with all aspects of clinical periodontology, restorative dentistry, and implantology. This includes pertinent research as well as clinical methodology (their interdependence and relationship should be addressed where applicable); proceedings of relevant symposia or conferences; and quality review papers. Original manuscripts are considered for publication on the condition that they have not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
The Trapezoidal Sling Suture: A Technical Note of a Novel Suturing Technique for Tunneling Flap Procedures. Treatment of Mandibular Class III/IV Furcation Defects with a Combination Plastic Regenerative Technique: A Case Series. The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative to Modulate Wound Healing of Peri-implant Soft Tissues. Root Coverage and Volumetric Outcomes of a Novel Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix with the Tunneled Coronally Advanced Flap (TCAF) for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions: A Clinical Prospective Study. The Guided Bone Regeneration of a Large, Noncontained Maxillary Anterior Perforation Defect: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1