Eric H Gruenberger, Sohrab K Vatsia, Rourke M Stay, Cameron Kersey, Mudassar A Khan, Douglas W Pahl
{"title":"The Hoffmann parallax: a prospective study to determine the benefit of Hoffmann's sign.","authors":"Eric H Gruenberger, Sohrab K Vatsia, Rourke M Stay, Cameron Kersey, Mudassar A Khan, Douglas W Pahl","doi":"10.52965/001c.77875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign (<i>p</i> =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; <i>p</i> =0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"77875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317513/pdf/orthopedicreviews_2023_15_77875.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.77875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon.
Materials & methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings.
Results: Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign (p =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; p =0.031).
Conclusions: The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.