Assessing the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology protocols, abstracts, and trials: Adherence to the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2023-03-22 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npad017
Joshua S Suppree, Avni Patel, Sumirat M Keshwara, Sandhya Trichinopoly Krishna, Conor S Gillespie, George E Richardson, Mohammad A Mustafa, Sophia Hart, Abdurrahman I Islim, Michael D Jenkinson, Christopher P Millward
{"title":"Assessing the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology protocols, abstracts, and trials: Adherence to the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.","authors":"Joshua S Suppree, Avni Patel, Sumirat M Keshwara, Sandhya Trichinopoly Krishna, Conor S Gillespie, George E Richardson, Mohammad A Mustafa, Sophia Hart, Abdurrahman I Islim, Michael D Jenkinson, Christopher P Millward","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive and transparent reporting of clinical trial activity is important. The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statements define the items to be reported in clinical trial protocols and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The aim of this methodological review was to assess the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult primary and secondary brain tumor phase 3 trial protocols and result articles published after the introduction of the SPIRIT 2013 statement, were identified through searches of 4 electronic bibliographic databases. Following extraction of baseline demographic data, the reporting quality of independently included trial protocols and result articles was assessed against the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements respectively. The CONSORT-A checklist, an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement, was used to specifically assess the abstract accompanying the trial results article. Percentage adherence (standard deviation [SD]) was calculated for each article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven trial protocols, and 36 trial result articles were included. Mean adherence of trial protocols to the SPIRIT statement was 79.4% (SD: 0.11). Mean adherence of trial abstracts to CONSORT-A was 75.3% (SD: 0.12) and trial result articles to CONSORT was 74.5% (SD: 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles requires improvement to ensure comprehensive and transparent communication of planned neuro-oncology clinical trials and results within the literature. Raising awareness by clinical triallists and implementing mandatory evidence of proof of adherence by journals should improve reporting quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 4","pages":"391-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10346400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive and transparent reporting of clinical trial activity is important. The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statements define the items to be reported in clinical trial protocols and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The aim of this methodological review was to assess the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles.

Methods: Adult primary and secondary brain tumor phase 3 trial protocols and result articles published after the introduction of the SPIRIT 2013 statement, were identified through searches of 4 electronic bibliographic databases. Following extraction of baseline demographic data, the reporting quality of independently included trial protocols and result articles was assessed against the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements respectively. The CONSORT-A checklist, an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement, was used to specifically assess the abstract accompanying the trial results article. Percentage adherence (standard deviation [SD]) was calculated for each article.

Results: Seven trial protocols, and 36 trial result articles were included. Mean adherence of trial protocols to the SPIRIT statement was 79.4% (SD: 0.11). Mean adherence of trial abstracts to CONSORT-A was 75.3% (SD: 0.12) and trial result articles to CONSORT was 74.5% (SD: 0.10).

Conclusion: The reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles requires improvement to ensure comprehensive and transparent communication of planned neuro-oncology clinical trials and results within the literature. Raising awareness by clinical triallists and implementing mandatory evidence of proof of adherence by journals should improve reporting quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估成人神经肿瘤学方案、摘要和试验的报告质量:遵守 SPIRIT 和 CONSORT 声明。
背景:全面、透明地报告临床试验活动非常重要。标准方案项目:2013》(SPIRIT)和《2010》(CONSORT)分别规定了临床试验方案和随机对照试验的报告项目。本方法学综述旨在评估成人神经肿瘤学试验方案和试验结果文章的报告质量:通过检索 4 个电子文献数据库,确定了 SPIRIT 2013 声明发布后发表的成人原发性和继发性脑肿瘤 3 期试验方案和结果文章。提取基线人口统计学数据后,分别根据 SPIRIT 和 CONSORT 声明评估了独立纳入的试验方案和结果文章的报告质量。CONSORT-A核对表是CONSORT 2010声明的延伸,用于专门评估试验结果文章所附的摘要。计算每篇文章的遵守百分比(标准偏差 [SD]):结果:共纳入 7 份试验方案和 36 篇试验结果文章。试验方案对 SPIRIT 声明的平均遵守率为 79.4%(标准差:0.11)。试验摘要对CONSORT-A的平均遵守率为75.3%(标度:0.12),试验结果文章对CONSORT的平均遵守率为74.5%(标度:0.10):成人神经肿瘤学试验方案和试验结果文章的报告质量有待提高,以确保神经肿瘤学临床试验计划和结果在文献中得到全面、透明的传播。提高临床试验人员的意识,并强制要求期刊提供相关证据,应能提高报告质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Glioma resource outreach with support: A program to identify and initiate supportive care interventions for unmet needs among adult lower-grade glioma patients. Well-intentioned is not always beneficial: Why we should question prescription habits. Long-term effects on fertility after central nervous system cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Socioeconomic driven disparities in neuro-oncology. Palliative care services in neuro-oncology: Mind the gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1