Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s40257-023-00788-2
Tadashi Terui, Yukari Okubo, Satomi Kobayashi, Shigetoshi Sano, Akimichi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, Yayoi Tada, Masatoshi Abe, Masafumi Yaguchi, Natsuka Uehara, Takahiro Handa, Masayuki Tanaka, Wendy Zhang, Maria Paris, Masamoto Murakami
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study","authors":"Tadashi Terui,&nbsp;Yukari Okubo,&nbsp;Satomi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Shigetoshi Sano,&nbsp;Akimichi Morita,&nbsp;Shinichi Imafuku,&nbsp;Yayoi Tada,&nbsp;Masatoshi Abe,&nbsp;Masafumi Yaguchi,&nbsp;Natsuka Uehara,&nbsp;Takahiro Handa,&nbsp;Masayuki Tanaka,&nbsp;Wendy Zhang,&nbsp;Maria Paris,&nbsp;Masamoto Murakami","doi":"10.1007/s40257-023-00788-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient’s visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (<i>P</i> = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal <i>P</i> = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal <i>P</i> ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Apremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed.</p><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov</h3><p>NCT04057937.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/e6/40257_2023_Article_788.PMC10213585.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-023-00788-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment.

Methods

This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient’s visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain).

Results

A total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (P = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal P = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal P ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea.

Conclusions

Apremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT04057937.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿普雷司特治疗日本掌跖Pustulosis患者的疗效和安全性:一项2期随机安慰剂对照研究的结果
背景掌跖脓疱病(PPP)是一种瘙痒、疼痛、复发和慢性皮炎,治疗选择有限。目的评价阿普司特治疗日本PPP患者的疗效和安全性。方法这项2期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究纳入了在筛查和基线时对局部治疗反应不足的掌跖脓疱面积和严重程度指数(PPPASI)总分≥12,手掌或足底有中度或重度脓疱/小泡(PPPASI-脓疱/小泡严重程度评分≥2)的患者。患者被随机(1:1)接受阿普司特30 mg,每日两次或安慰剂治疗16周,然后是16周的延长期,在此期间所有患者都接受阿普司特治疗。主要终点是PPPASI-50反应的实现(PPPASI比基线改善≥50%)。主要次要终点包括PPPASI总分、掌跖Pustulosis严重程度指数(PPSI)和患者PPP症状(瘙痒和不适/疼痛)视觉模拟评分(VAS)与基线相比的变化。与安慰剂相比,在第16周使用阿普司特的患者达到PPPASI-50的比例明显更高(P=0.0003)。与安慰剂相比(标称P=0.0013),接受阿普司t的患者在第16周有更大的PPPASI改善,PPSI和患者报告的瘙痒和不适/疼痛(所有患者的标称P≤0.001)。阿培司特治疗的改善持续到第32周。最常见的治疗突发不良事件包括腹泻、腹部不适、头痛和恶心。结论在日本PPP患者中,与安慰剂相比,在第16周,首次治疗在疾病严重程度和患者报告的症状方面有更大的改善,并在第32周持续改善。未观察到新的安全信号。ClinicalTrials.govNCT04057937。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
期刊最新文献
KECORT Study: An International e-Delphi Study on the Treatment of KEloids Using Intralesional CORTicosteroids in Clinical Practice Predicting the Time to Relapse Following Withdrawal from Different Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis who Responded to Therapy: A 12-Year Multicenter Cohort Study Update on Stevens–Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management A Practice Approach to Acne Fulminans in Adolescents Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Psoriasis Assessment: The Beginning of a New Diagnostic Era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1