Pub Date : 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00926-y
Francesco Leo, Michela Ortoncelli, Ruggero Cascio Ingurgio, Benedetta Galli, Laura Grigolato, Claudia Paganini, Martina Maurelli, Eugenia Veronica Di Brizzi, Giuseppe Lauletta, Francesca Barei, Chiara Anna Fiasconaro, Marta Casale Alloa, Mario Bruno Guanti, Niccolò Gori, Andrea Chiricozzi, Maddalena Napolitano, Cataldo Patruno, Marco Galluzzo, Mariateresa Rossi, Anna Balato, Silvia Mariel Ferrucci, Angelo Valerio Marzano, Elena Pezzolo, Caterina Foti, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luigi Gargiulo, Alessandra Narcisi, Pietro Quaglino, Simone Ribero, Luca Mastorino
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that significantly impairs the quality of life. Recent advancements in systemic therapies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, offer very effective new treatment options. However, concerns regarding potential adverse events, including cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk, have emerged from clinical studies and call for further real-life investigations. This has highlighted the need to establish specific risk categories, such as tobacco smokers.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, in patients who smoke with moderate-to-severe AD over a 2-year treatment period, comparing outcomes with patients who do not smoke.
Patients and methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted across 12 dermatology departments in Italy, including 375 patients treated with upadacitinib. The presence and intensity of smoking habits as well as effectiveness scores and safety data were collected.
Results: Patients who smoke accounted for 36.8% of the sample. Two thromboembolic events in patients who do not smoke were recorded in the 2-year (median follow up of 52.6 weeks) observation period. The most common adverse event was acneiform eruption (12.4% of patients after 104 weeks). No significant differences related to safety emerged regarding the presence or absence of a smoking habit. Drug survival was very high with no differences between the two cohorts (83.5% after 104 weeks for patients who smoke).
Conclusions: This study suggests that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in presence of tobacco smoke, with no significant differences in safety or effectiveness compared with patients who do not smoke.
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Smoke: a 2-Year Real-Life Multicenter Study.","authors":"Francesco Leo, Michela Ortoncelli, Ruggero Cascio Ingurgio, Benedetta Galli, Laura Grigolato, Claudia Paganini, Martina Maurelli, Eugenia Veronica Di Brizzi, Giuseppe Lauletta, Francesca Barei, Chiara Anna Fiasconaro, Marta Casale Alloa, Mario Bruno Guanti, Niccolò Gori, Andrea Chiricozzi, Maddalena Napolitano, Cataldo Patruno, Marco Galluzzo, Mariateresa Rossi, Anna Balato, Silvia Mariel Ferrucci, Angelo Valerio Marzano, Elena Pezzolo, Caterina Foti, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luigi Gargiulo, Alessandra Narcisi, Pietro Quaglino, Simone Ribero, Luca Mastorino","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00926-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-00926-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that significantly impairs the quality of life. Recent advancements in systemic therapies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, offer very effective new treatment options. However, concerns regarding potential adverse events, including cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk, have emerged from clinical studies and call for further real-life investigations. This has highlighted the need to establish specific risk categories, such as tobacco smokers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, in patients who smoke with moderate-to-severe AD over a 2-year treatment period, comparing outcomes with patients who do not smoke.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was conducted across 12 dermatology departments in Italy, including 375 patients treated with upadacitinib. The presence and intensity of smoking habits as well as effectiveness scores and safety data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who smoke accounted for 36.8% of the sample. Two thromboembolic events in patients who do not smoke were recorded in the 2-year (median follow up of 52.6 weeks) observation period. The most common adverse event was acneiform eruption (12.4% of patients after 104 weeks). No significant differences related to safety emerged regarding the presence or absence of a smoking habit. Drug survival was very high with no differences between the two cohorts (83.5% after 104 weeks for patients who smoke).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in presence of tobacco smoke, with no significant differences in safety or effectiveness compared with patients who do not smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143490386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Innovations in biologics are transforming the treatment of psoriatic diseases. The ability to target specific levels of immune activation provides a distinct advantage. Interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors fall into this class of biologics, and they are effectively used to treat a spectrum of psoriatic diseases, such as psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. In recent years, anti-IL-17 agents have been the focus of therapeutic development, with various formulations and routes of administration. In this manuscript, we review pipeline anti-IL-17 therapies for psoriatic diseases identified through a search of ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2019-December 2024) and other databases. Key agents under investigation include netakimab, vunakizumab, xeligekimab, gumokimab, HB0017, CJM 112, JS005, 608, LZM012, ZL-1102, izokibep, sonelokimab, DC-806, DC-853, and LEO 153339. Both preclinical and clinical trial data for each agent are summarized, with an emphasis on their efficacy, adverse effects, immunogenicity, and future outlooks.
{"title":"Next-Generation Anti-IL-17 Agents for Psoriatic Disease: A Pipeline Review.","authors":"Dahyeon Kim, Seanna Yang, Minka Gill, Nickoulet Babaei, Mireya Cervantes, Jashin J Wu","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00928-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-00928-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Innovations in biologics are transforming the treatment of psoriatic diseases. The ability to target specific levels of immune activation provides a distinct advantage. Interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors fall into this class of biologics, and they are effectively used to treat a spectrum of psoriatic diseases, such as psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. In recent years, anti-IL-17 agents have been the focus of therapeutic development, with various formulations and routes of administration. In this manuscript, we review pipeline anti-IL-17 therapies for psoriatic diseases identified through a search of ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2019-December 2024) and other databases. Key agents under investigation include netakimab, vunakizumab, xeligekimab, gumokimab, HB0017, CJM 112, JS005, 608, LZM012, ZL-1102, izokibep, sonelokimab, DC-806, DC-853, and LEO 153339. Both preclinical and clinical trial data for each agent are summarized, with an emphasis on their efficacy, adverse effects, immunogenicity, and future outlooks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143466766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00930-2
Caitlyn B Dagenet, Swetha Atluri, Elaine Ma, Lauren Tong, Khiem A Tran, Joshua Hekmatjah, Rahul Masson, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi
{"title":"Correction to: Adherence to Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment.","authors":"Caitlyn B Dagenet, Swetha Atluri, Elaine Ma, Lauren Tong, Khiem A Tran, Joshua Hekmatjah, Rahul Masson, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00930-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-00930-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143405383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-12DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00923-1
Zequn Tong, Xueting Zeng, Fuchen Huang, Zhenlan Wu, Huayu Chen, Yihua Zhang, Jiawen Chen, Renwei Luo, Fa Chen, Ying Zou, Chao Ji, Ting Gong
Background: The effectiveness of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in treating atopic dermatitis (AD) is well established. However, little is known about whether disease control can be maintained with longer dosing intervals, especially in older patients who are at higher risk of adverse events from JAK inhibitors. The treat-to-target (T2T) consensus was established to guide systemic treatment in adults with AD, aiming to achieve disease control promptly and sustain it in the long term.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended JAK inhibitor dosing intervals based on the T2T consensus in older adults.
Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to February 2024. Fifty-eight elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) were included in the study and received upadacitinib with gradually longer dosing intervals. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining different treatment dosing intervals at the end of the follow-up, as well as the assessment of six scales at every visit.
Results: Among the 58 patients (median [IQR] age, 70 [68-77] years) included in the study, 86.2% completed the 1-year follow-up. By the last visit, among those who completed the follow-up, 26.0% maintained a dosing interval of every 3 days, and 72.0% maintained a dosing interval of every 2 days. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 29.3% among all patients, with the most common AE reported being herpes virus infection (13.8%).
Conclusions: The dose reduction regimen guided by the T2T consensus was well tolerated in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Prolonging dosing intervals offers potential benefits for both patients and socioeconomic outcomes.
{"title":"Upadacitinib Dose Reduction Regimen in Elderly Patients with Atopic Dermatitis, Guided by Treat-to-Target Consensus Recommendations.","authors":"Zequn Tong, Xueting Zeng, Fuchen Huang, Zhenlan Wu, Huayu Chen, Yihua Zhang, Jiawen Chen, Renwei Luo, Fa Chen, Ying Zou, Chao Ji, Ting Gong","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00923-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-00923-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in treating atopic dermatitis (AD) is well established. However, little is known about whether disease control can be maintained with longer dosing intervals, especially in older patients who are at higher risk of adverse events from JAK inhibitors. The treat-to-target (T2T) consensus was established to guide systemic treatment in adults with AD, aiming to achieve disease control promptly and sustain it in the long term.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended JAK inhibitor dosing intervals based on the T2T consensus in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study was conducted from July 2022 to February 2024. Fifty-eight elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) were included in the study and received upadacitinib with gradually longer dosing intervals. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining different treatment dosing intervals at the end of the follow-up, as well as the assessment of six scales at every visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 58 patients (median [IQR] age, 70 [68-77] years) included in the study, 86.2% completed the 1-year follow-up. By the last visit, among those who completed the follow-up, 26.0% maintained a dosing interval of every 3 days, and 72.0% maintained a dosing interval of every 2 days. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 29.3% among all patients, with the most common AE reported being herpes virus infection (13.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dose reduction regimen guided by the T2T consensus was well tolerated in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Prolonging dosing intervals offers potential benefits for both patients and socioeconomic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143405384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-07DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00917-z
Maddalena Napolitano, Maria Esposito, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Giampiero Girolomoni, Paolo Romita, Elena Nicoli, Paolo Matruglio, Caterina Foti
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a T helper 2-mediated chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects children and adults. Patients with AD are prone to recurrent infections of the skin and other organs, which can severely worsen the disease course. This review summarises the current evidence on the aetiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of infections in patients with AD. PubMed was searched for English-language research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines published until February 2023 using the key term “atopic dermatitis” and terms relevant to infections. Patients with AD have an increased risk of bacterial, viral and fungal infections of the skin, mainly due to impaired barrier function, altered immune response and frequent scratching. The most common pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus and herpes simplex virus, which can cause impetigo, folliculitis, abscesses, eczema herpeticum and other complications. They also appear to increase susceptibility to systemic infections, including respiratory and urinary tract infections and sepsis. Certain systemic treatments for AD, such as mycophenolate mofetil and Janus kinase inhibitors, increase the risk of viral infections. Prevention and treatment of recurrent infections in patients with AD require a multifaceted approach that includes topical and systemic antimicrobials, skin care and effective control of AD symptoms (to break the itch–scratch cycle). Preventing and limiting the development of infections are important considerations in choosing an AD treatment.
{"title":"Infections in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and the Influence of Treatment","authors":"Maddalena Napolitano, Maria Esposito, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Giampiero Girolomoni, Paolo Romita, Elena Nicoli, Paolo Matruglio, Caterina Foti","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00917-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-025-00917-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a T helper 2-mediated chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects children and adults. Patients with AD are prone to recurrent infections of the skin and other organs, which can severely worsen the disease course. This review summarises the current evidence on the aetiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of infections in patients with AD. PubMed was searched for English-language research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines published until February 2023 using the key term “atopic dermatitis” and terms relevant to infections. Patients with AD have an increased risk of bacterial, viral and fungal infections of the skin, mainly due to impaired barrier function, altered immune response and frequent scratching. The most common pathogens are <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and herpes simplex virus, which can cause impetigo, folliculitis, abscesses, eczema herpeticum and other complications. They also appear to increase susceptibility to systemic infections, including respiratory and urinary tract infections and sepsis. Certain systemic treatments for AD, such as mycophenolate mofetil and Janus kinase inhibitors, increase the risk of viral infections. Prevention and treatment of recurrent infections in patients with AD require a multifaceted approach that includes topical and systemic antimicrobials, skin care and effective control of AD symptoms (to break the itch–scratch cycle). Preventing and limiting the development of infections are important considerations in choosing an AD treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 2","pages":"183 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40257-025-00917-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00919-x
Luca Rapparini, Stephano Cedirian, Michelangelo La Placa, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Emanuel Raschi, Michela Starace
The unique immunomodulatory properties of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have attracted considerable interest beyond its use for malaria and rheumatological diseases, including a variety of dermatological conditions. Over recent years, especially after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the prescription of HCQ has also significantly expanded, sometimes inappropriately, thus posing additional challenges on its optimal use, due to emerging safety issues. In this review, we provide dermatologists with the latest advancements on selected clinically relevant toxicities, namely retinopathy, pro-arrhythmia, cutaneous reactions, and neuropsychiatric effects. It is hoped this update can assist dermatologists to identify high-risk patients for tailored monitoring, screening, and risk minimization strategies, thus supporting safer HCQ prescribing.
{"title":"Safety of Hydroxychloroquine: What a Dermatologist Should Know","authors":"Luca Rapparini, Stephano Cedirian, Michelangelo La Placa, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Emanuel Raschi, Michela Starace","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00919-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-025-00919-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unique immunomodulatory properties of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have attracted considerable interest beyond its use for malaria and rheumatological diseases, including a variety of dermatological conditions. Over recent years, especially after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the prescription of HCQ has also significantly expanded, sometimes inappropriately, thus posing additional challenges on its optimal use, due to emerging safety issues. In this review, we provide dermatologists with the latest advancements on selected clinically relevant toxicities, namely retinopathy, pro-arrhythmia, cutaneous reactions, and neuropsychiatric effects. It is hoped this update can assist dermatologists to identify high-risk patients for tailored monitoring, screening, and risk minimization strategies, thus supporting safer HCQ prescribing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 2","pages":"251 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40257-025-00919-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143078400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00922-2
Siddhartha Sood, Alexander Rimke, Brian D. Rankin, Abrahim Abduelmula, Jorge R. Georgakopoulos, Khalad Maliyar, Ahmed Bagit, Fernejoy Leung, Alim R. Devani, Ronald Vender, Jensen Yeung, Vimal H. Prajapati
{"title":"Real-World Experience of Bimekizumab for Plaque Psoriasis in Adult Patients with Prior Exposure to Interleukin-23 Inhibitors: A Multicenter Retrospective Study","authors":"Siddhartha Sood, Alexander Rimke, Brian D. Rankin, Abrahim Abduelmula, Jorge R. Georgakopoulos, Khalad Maliyar, Ahmed Bagit, Fernejoy Leung, Alim R. Devani, Ronald Vender, Jensen Yeung, Vimal H. Prajapati","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00922-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-025-00922-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 2","pages":"301 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143121734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00924-0
Allison Yan, Lauren Madigan, Abraham Korman, Sabrina Shearer, Brittany Dulmage, Tejesh Patel, Nima Milani-Nejad, Catherine Chung, Kristopher Fisher, Benjamin Kaffenberger
Morbilliform eruptions, which are a clinical reaction pattern characterized by erythematous macules and papules coalescing into patches that cover most of the skin surface, are one of the most common cutaneous findings in the inpatient setting. In the hospital setting, most causes are benign and due to low-risk drug exanthems; however, morbilliform eruptions may also be a sign of high-risk diseases, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and graft-versus-host disease. Proper identification of the etiology and risk stratification of a morbilliform eruption is critical to ensure proper management and optimize patient outcomes. In this review, we discuss the key features that differentiate high-risk from low-risk morbilliform eruptions, as well as specific characteristics that differentiate the different high-risk eruptions. Additionally, we offer a clinical algorithm that may be applied in the management of a patient who presents with a morbilliform rash.
{"title":"Morbilliform Eruptions: Differentiating Low-Risk Drug Eruptions, Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Viral Eruptions, and Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.","authors":"Allison Yan, Lauren Madigan, Abraham Korman, Sabrina Shearer, Brittany Dulmage, Tejesh Patel, Nima Milani-Nejad, Catherine Chung, Kristopher Fisher, Benjamin Kaffenberger","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00924-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-025-00924-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morbilliform eruptions, which are a clinical reaction pattern characterized by erythematous macules and papules coalescing into patches that cover most of the skin surface, are one of the most common cutaneous findings in the inpatient setting. In the hospital setting, most causes are benign and due to low-risk drug exanthems; however, morbilliform eruptions may also be a sign of high-risk diseases, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and graft-versus-host disease. Proper identification of the etiology and risk stratification of a morbilliform eruption is critical to ensure proper management and optimize patient outcomes. In this review, we discuss the key features that differentiate high-risk from low-risk morbilliform eruptions, as well as specific characteristics that differentiate the different high-risk eruptions. Additionally, we offer a clinical algorithm that may be applied in the management of a patient who presents with a morbilliform rash.</p>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.1007/s40257-025-00920-4
Karam Khaddour, Elizabeth I. Buchbinder
Individualized neoantigen-directed therapy represents a groundbreaking approach in melanoma treatment that leverages the patient’s own immune system to target cancer cells. This innovative strategy involves the identification of unique immunogenic neoantigens (mutated proteins specific to an individual’s tumor) and the development of therapeutic vaccines that either consist of peptide sequences or RNA encoding these neoantigens. The goal of these therapies is to induce neoantigen-specific immune responses, enabling the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells presenting the targeted neoantigens. This individualized approach is particularly advantageous given the genetic heterogeneity of melanoma, which exhibits distinct mutations among different patients. In contrast to traditional therapies, neoantigen-directed therapy offers a tailored treatment that potentially reduces off-target side effects and enhances therapeutic efficacy. Recent advances in neoantigen prediction and vaccine development have facilitated clinical trials exploring the combination of neoantigen vaccines with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These trials have shown promising clinical outcomes, underscoring the potential of this personalized approach. This review provides an overview of the rationale behind neoantigen-directed therapies and summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding personalized neoantigen vaccines in melanoma treatment.
{"title":"Individualized Neoantigen-Directed Melanoma Therapy","authors":"Karam Khaddour, Elizabeth I. Buchbinder","doi":"10.1007/s40257-025-00920-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40257-025-00920-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individualized neoantigen-directed therapy represents a groundbreaking approach in melanoma treatment that leverages the patient’s own immune system to target cancer cells. This innovative strategy involves the identification of unique immunogenic neoantigens (mutated proteins specific to an individual’s tumor) and the development of therapeutic vaccines that either consist of peptide sequences or RNA encoding these neoantigens. The goal of these therapies is to induce neoantigen-specific immune responses, enabling the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells presenting the targeted neoantigens. This individualized approach is particularly advantageous given the genetic heterogeneity of melanoma, which exhibits distinct mutations among different patients. In contrast to traditional therapies, neoantigen-directed therapy offers a tailored treatment that potentially reduces off-target side effects and enhances therapeutic efficacy. Recent advances in neoantigen prediction and vaccine development have facilitated clinical trials exploring the combination of neoantigen vaccines with immune checkpoint inhibitors. These trials have shown promising clinical outcomes, underscoring the potential of this personalized approach. This review provides an overview of the rationale behind neoantigen-directed therapies and summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding personalized neoantigen vaccines in melanoma treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":"26 2","pages":"225 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143057422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}