Paracetamol Versus Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Shivering in Liposuction Surgeries Under Combined General Epidural Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Amr Samir Wahdan, George Eshak Loza, Hussain Othman Alshehri, Ahmed Farag Shedid, Atef Kamel Salama, Wessam Samir Wahdan, Mennatallah Magdi Mohamed
{"title":"Paracetamol Versus Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Shivering in Liposuction Surgeries Under Combined General Epidural Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amr Samir Wahdan,&nbsp;George Eshak Loza,&nbsp;Hussain Othman Alshehri,&nbsp;Ahmed Farag Shedid,&nbsp;Atef Kamel Salama,&nbsp;Wessam Samir Wahdan,&nbsp;Mennatallah Magdi Mohamed","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2022.22927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative shivering (POS) is considered one of the most common complications that is encountered by the anaesthetists worldwide. Despite using several treatment options, there has not been a clear consensus regarding this issue. This trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of paracetamol and ondansetron in preventing POS in patients undergoing liposuction procedures under combined general epidural anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty patients scheduled for liposuction were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group P (paracetamol group) which received 1 g paracetamol intravenously, group O (ondansetron group) which received 8 mg of ondansetron intravenously, and group S (saline group), which received 100 mL normal saline intravenously; all medications were given postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of POS, and the secondary outcomes included shivering score, tympanic temperature, and the occurrence of side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of occurrence of POS was found to be lower in groups P and O compared to group S with values of 25% and 37.50% vs. 77.50%, respectively, with a <i>P</i> value <0.001. Additionally, the severity of POS was found to be lower in groups P and O compared to group S (<i>P</i> <0.001). Tympanic temperature and complications were comparable between the groups with no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of paracetamol or ondansetron at the end of the procedure was shown to be of great value in reducing the incidence and severity of POS, with no statistically significant difference between the paracetamol and ondansetron groups. Moreover, no significant drawbacks were reported as a result of using these medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"51 3","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2022.22927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative shivering (POS) is considered one of the most common complications that is encountered by the anaesthetists worldwide. Despite using several treatment options, there has not been a clear consensus regarding this issue. This trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of paracetamol and ondansetron in preventing POS in patients undergoing liposuction procedures under combined general epidural anaesthesia.

Methods: One hundred twenty patients scheduled for liposuction were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group P (paracetamol group) which received 1 g paracetamol intravenously, group O (ondansetron group) which received 8 mg of ondansetron intravenously, and group S (saline group), which received 100 mL normal saline intravenously; all medications were given postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of POS, and the secondary outcomes included shivering score, tympanic temperature, and the occurrence of side effects.

Results: The incidence of occurrence of POS was found to be lower in groups P and O compared to group S with values of 25% and 37.50% vs. 77.50%, respectively, with a P value <0.001. Additionally, the severity of POS was found to be lower in groups P and O compared to group S (P <0.001). Tympanic temperature and complications were comparable between the groups with no significant differences.

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of paracetamol or ondansetron at the end of the procedure was shown to be of great value in reducing the incidence and severity of POS, with no statistically significant difference between the paracetamol and ondansetron groups. Moreover, no significant drawbacks were reported as a result of using these medications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扑热息痛与昂丹司琼联合硬膜外麻醉预防吸脂术后寒战:一项随机对照试验
目的:术后寒战(POS)被认为是全世界麻醉师最常见的并发症之一。尽管使用了几种治疗方案,但在这个问题上还没有明确的共识。本试验旨在探讨扑热息痛和昂丹司琼预防硬膜外联合全身麻醉吸脂术患者发生POS的有效性和安全性。方法:120例抽脂患者随机分为3组:P组(扑热息痛组)静脉滴注扑热息痛1 g, O组(昂丹司琼组)静脉滴注昂丹司琼8 mg, S组(生理盐水组)静脉滴注生理盐水100 mL;所有药物均在术后给予。主要结局是POS的发生率,次要结局包括寒战评分、鼓室温度和副作用的发生。结果:P组和O组的POS发生率较S组低,分别为25%和37.50%比77.50%,P值为P。结论:在手术结束时预防性使用扑热息痛或昂丹司琼对降低POS的发生率和严重程度具有重要价值,扑热息痛组和昂丹司琼组之间差异无统计学意义。此外,使用这些药物没有明显的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Anaesthesia Management of A Patient with Airway Obstruction Caused by Prosthetic Vascular Graft Invasion into the Tracheal Lumen. Bispectral Index Guidance Reduced Target Plasma Propofol Concentration During ERCP in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl in Intraoperative Neuromuscular Monitoring Using A Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Regimen in Spine Surgeries. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1