Truthfulness Predominates in Americans' Conceptualizations of Honesty: A Prototype Analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1177/01461672231195355
Caleb J Reynolds, Emily Stokes, Eranda Jayawickreme, R Michael Furr
{"title":"Truthfulness Predominates in Americans' Conceptualizations of Honesty: A Prototype Analysis.","authors":"Caleb J Reynolds, Emily Stokes, Eranda Jayawickreme, R Michael Furr","doi":"10.1177/01461672231195355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Honesty is a near universally valued trait. However, the term <i>honesty</i> captures a litany of traits and behaviors, obscuring research on social perceptions and trait measurement of honesty and creating philosophical difficulties in accounting for what (if anything) unifies this diversity. We applied a prototype analysis approach to identify the most central elements of lay honesty conceptualizations, identifying elements that come to mind and are explicitly acknowledged as important to honesty. In five studies (<i>N</i> = 1,442), U.S. American participants generated 6,000+ free responses characterizing honesty and indicated which subtraits and behaviors best represent honesty. Truthfulness was most central to lay honesty conceptualizations across all studies and several centrality indices (frequency among responses and participants, agreement across participants, priority in lists, explicit ratings), though several other features were prominent. Findings illuminate social perceptions of honesty, critique popular measurement of trait honesty, and offer empirical foundations for philosophical analysis of honesty.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"573-595"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231195355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Honesty is a near universally valued trait. However, the term honesty captures a litany of traits and behaviors, obscuring research on social perceptions and trait measurement of honesty and creating philosophical difficulties in accounting for what (if anything) unifies this diversity. We applied a prototype analysis approach to identify the most central elements of lay honesty conceptualizations, identifying elements that come to mind and are explicitly acknowledged as important to honesty. In five studies (N = 1,442), U.S. American participants generated 6,000+ free responses characterizing honesty and indicated which subtraits and behaviors best represent honesty. Truthfulness was most central to lay honesty conceptualizations across all studies and several centrality indices (frequency among responses and participants, agreement across participants, priority in lists, explicit ratings), though several other features were prominent. Findings illuminate social perceptions of honesty, critique popular measurement of trait honesty, and offer empirical foundations for philosophical analysis of honesty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诚实在美国人的诚信观念中占主导地位:原型分析》。
诚实几乎是一种普遍重视的特质。然而,"诚实 "一词包含了一系列的特质和行为,模糊了对 "诚实 "的社会认知和特质测量的研究,并在解释是什么(如果有的话)统一了这种多样性方面造成了哲学上的困难。我们采用了原型分析方法来识别非专业诚实概念中最核心的要素,找出那些浮现在脑海中并被明确认为对诚实很重要的要素。在五项研究中(N = 1,442),美国参与者自由回答了 6,000 多条关于诚实的特征,并指出了哪些子特征和行为最能代表诚实。在所有研究中,真实是外行人诚实概念化的最核心要素,同时也是几个核心指数(回答和参与者之间的频率、参与者之间的一致、列表中的优先级、明确的评级)的核心要素,尽管其他几个特征也很突出。研究结果阐明了社会对诚实的看法,对特质诚实的流行测量方法提出了批评,并为诚实的哲学分析提供了经验基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Spirituality of Science: Implications for Meaning, Well-Being, and Learning. Friendships in Emerging Adulthood: The Role of Parental and Friendship Attachment Representations and Intimacy. Truthfulness Predominates in Americans' Conceptualizations of Honesty: A Prototype Analysis. The Best-Case Heuristic: Relative Optimism in Relationships, Politics, and a Global Health Pandemic. Emphasizing Similarities Between Politically Opposed Groups and Their Influence in Perceptions of the Political Opposition: Evidence From Five Experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1