Variation in Outpatient Postpartum Care Use in the United States: A Latent Class Analysis

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.001
Jamie R. Daw PhD , Nina R. Joyce PhD , Erika F. Werner MD , Katy B. Kozhimannil PhD , Maria W. Steenland SD
{"title":"Variation in Outpatient Postpartum Care Use in the United States: A Latent Class Analysis","authors":"Jamie R. Daw PhD ,&nbsp;Nina R. Joyce PhD ,&nbsp;Erika F. Werner MD ,&nbsp;Katy B. Kozhimannil PhD ,&nbsp;Maria W. Steenland SD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite efforts to improve postpartum health care<span> in the United States, little is known about patterns of postpartum care beyond routine postpartum visit attendance. This study aimed to describe variation in outpatient postpartum care patterns.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>In this longitudinal cohort study of national commercial claims data, we used </span>latent class analysis<span> to identify subgroups of patients (classes) with similar outpatient postpartum care patterns (defined by the number of preventive, problem, and emergency department outpatient visits in the 60 days after birth). We also compared classes in terms of maternal sociodemographics and clinical characteristics measured at childbirth, as well as total health spending and rates of adverse events (all-cause hospitalizations and severe maternal morbidity) measured from childbirth to the late postpartum period (61–365 days after birth).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>The study cohort included 250,048 patients hospitalized for childbirth in 2016. We identified six classes with distinct outpatient postpartum care patterns in the 60 days after birth, which we classified into three broad groups: no care (class 1 [32.4% of the total sample]); </span>preventive care<span> only (class 2 [18.3%]); and problem care (classes 3–6 [49.3%]). The prevalence of clinical risk factors at childbirth increased progressively from class 1 to class 6; for example, 6.7% of class 1 patients had any chronic disease compared with 15.5% of class 5 patients. Severe </span></span>maternal morbidity was highest among the high problem care classes (classes 5 and 6): 1.5% of class 6 patients experienced severe maternal morbidity in the postpartum period and 0.5% in the late postpartum period, compared with less than 0.1% of patients in classes 1 and 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Efforts to redesign and measure postpartum care should reflect the current heterogeneity in care patterns and clinical risks in the postpartum population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 508-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723001007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite efforts to improve postpartum health care in the United States, little is known about patterns of postpartum care beyond routine postpartum visit attendance. This study aimed to describe variation in outpatient postpartum care patterns.

Methods

In this longitudinal cohort study of national commercial claims data, we used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of patients (classes) with similar outpatient postpartum care patterns (defined by the number of preventive, problem, and emergency department outpatient visits in the 60 days after birth). We also compared classes in terms of maternal sociodemographics and clinical characteristics measured at childbirth, as well as total health spending and rates of adverse events (all-cause hospitalizations and severe maternal morbidity) measured from childbirth to the late postpartum period (61–365 days after birth).

Results

The study cohort included 250,048 patients hospitalized for childbirth in 2016. We identified six classes with distinct outpatient postpartum care patterns in the 60 days after birth, which we classified into three broad groups: no care (class 1 [32.4% of the total sample]); preventive care only (class 2 [18.3%]); and problem care (classes 3–6 [49.3%]). The prevalence of clinical risk factors at childbirth increased progressively from class 1 to class 6; for example, 6.7% of class 1 patients had any chronic disease compared with 15.5% of class 5 patients. Severe maternal morbidity was highest among the high problem care classes (classes 5 and 6): 1.5% of class 6 patients experienced severe maternal morbidity in the postpartum period and 0.5% in the late postpartum period, compared with less than 0.1% of patients in classes 1 and 2.

Conclusions

Efforts to redesign and measure postpartum care should reflect the current heterogeneity in care patterns and clinical risks in the postpartum population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国门诊产后护理使用的变化:潜在类别分析
引言尽管美国努力改善产后保健,但除了常规的产后探访之外,人们对产后护理模式知之甚少。本研究旨在描述门诊产后护理模式的变化。方法在这项针对国家商业索赔数据的纵向队列研究中,我们使用潜在类别分析来确定具有类似门诊产后护理模式的患者亚组(类别)(定义为出生后60天内的预防性、问题性和急诊门诊就诊次数)。我们还比较了产妇的社会人口统计和分娩时测量的临床特征,以及从分娩到产后晚期(出生后61-365天)的总健康支出和不良事件发生率(全因住院和严重孕产妇发病率)。结果研究队列包括2016年因分娩住院的250048名患者。我们确定了在出生后60天内具有不同门诊产后护理模式的六个类别,我们将其分为三大类:无护理(类别1[32.4%的总样本]);仅预防性护理(2级[18.3%]);和问题护理(3-6级[49.3%])。分娩时临床危险因素的患病率从1级逐渐增加到6级;例如,6.7%的1类患者患有任何慢性病,而5类患者的这一比例为15.5%。严重产妇发病率在高问题护理级别(5级和6级)中最高:6级患者中有1.5%在产后出现严重产妇发病,与1级和2级中不到0.1%的患者相比。结论重新设计和衡量产后护理的努力应反映产后人群目前护理模式和临床风险的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Community-dwelling Black Women's Experiences With Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. "Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions. A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1