Generation, validation, and benchmarking of a commercial independent Monte Carlo calculation beam model for multi-target SRS.

Abstract

Background: Dosimetric validation of single isocenter multi-target radiosurgery plans is difficult due to conditions of electronic disequilibrium and the simultaneous irradiation of multiple off-axis lesions dispersed throughout the volume. Here we report the benchmarking of a customizable Monte Carlo secondary dose calculation algorithm specific for multi-target radiosurgery which future users may use to guide their commissioning and clinical implementation.

Purpose: To report the generation, validation, and clinical benchmarking of a volumetric Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation beam model for single isocenter radiosurgery of intracranial multi-focal disease.

Methods: The beam model was prepared within SciMoCa (ScientificRT, Munich Germany), a commercial independent dose calculation software, with the aim of broad availability via the commercial software for use with single isocenter radiosurgery. The process included (1) definition & acquisition of measurement data required for beam modeling, (2) tuning model parameters to match measurements, (3) validation of the beam model via independent measurements and end-to-end testing, and finally, (4) clinical benchmarking and validation of beam model utility in a patient specific QA setting. We utilized a 6X Flattening-Filter-Free photon beam from a TrueBeam STX linear accelerator (Siemens Healthineers, Munich Germany).

Results: In addition to the measured data required for standard IMRT/VMAT (depth dose, central axis profiles & output factors, leaf gap), beam modeling and validation for single-isocenter SRS required central axis and off axis (5 cm & 9 cm) small field output factors and comparison between measurement and simulation of backscatter with aperture for jaw much greater than MLCs. Validation end-to-end measurements included SRS MapCHECK in StereoPHAN geometry (2%/1 mm Gamma = 99.2% ± 2.2%), and OSL & scintillator measurements in anthropomorphic STEEV phantom (6 targets, volume = 0.1-4.1cc, distance from isocenter = 1.2-7.9 cm) for which mean difference was -1.9% ± 2.2%. For 10 patient cases, MC for individual PTVs was -0.8% ± 1.5%, -1.3% ± 1.7%, and -0.5% ± 1.8% for mean dose, D_95%, and D_1%, respectively. This corresponded to custom passing rates action limits per AAPM TG-218 guidelines of ±5.2%, ±6.4%, and ±6.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The beam modeling, validation, and clinical action criteria outlined here serves as a benchmark for future users of the customized beam model within SciMoCa for single isocenter radiosurgery of multi-focal disease.