Efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Chinese Medical Association Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000960
Tair-Shin Wang, Kuan-Hua Huang, Kuan-Chun Hsueh, Hsin-An Chen, Ka-Wai Tam, Shu-Hui Sun, Cheng-Fong Chen, Chien-Ying Wang, Min-Che Tung, Yuan-Hung Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Tair-Shin Wang,&nbsp;Kuan-Hua Huang,&nbsp;Kuan-Chun Hsueh,&nbsp;Hsin-An Chen,&nbsp;Ka-Wai Tam,&nbsp;Shu-Hui Sun,&nbsp;Cheng-Fong Chen,&nbsp;Chien-Ying Wang,&nbsp;Min-Che Tung,&nbsp;Yuan-Hung Wang","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the most important treatment for end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapies can prevent acute rejection for kidney transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is usually administered to prevent graft rejection after transplantation. Previous studies have indicated that once-daily tacrolimus may improve medication adherence. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes between once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies were identified from the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, and Embase until July 2022. Those randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo renal transplantation were included. A summary risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, nine RCTs were included. There were no differences in biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates between patients with once-daily and those with twice-daily tacrolimus (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.13) in 12 months. Regarding renal function, there was no significant difference between the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups (SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.07). In addition, the risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our major findings suggest that de novo renal transplantation recipients receiving once-daily tacrolimus immediately after transplantation have comparable efficacy and safety with those recipients who received twice-daily tacrolimus. Therefore, once-daily tacrolimus medication can be an alternative for de novo renal transplantation recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":"86 9","pages":"842-849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation is the most important treatment for end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapies can prevent acute rejection for kidney transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is usually administered to prevent graft rejection after transplantation. Previous studies have indicated that once-daily tacrolimus may improve medication adherence. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes between once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant patients.

Methods: Eligible studies were identified from the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, and Embase until July 2022. Those randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo renal transplantation were included. A summary risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results: In total, nine RCTs were included. There were no differences in biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates between patients with once-daily and those with twice-daily tacrolimus (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73-1.13) in 12 months. Regarding renal function, there was no significant difference between the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups (SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.07). In addition, the risk of graft failure, death, and adverse events in the first year was similar for the once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus groups.

Conclusion: Our major findings suggest that de novo renal transplantation recipients receiving once-daily tacrolimus immediately after transplantation have comparable efficacy and safety with those recipients who received twice-daily tacrolimus. Therefore, once-daily tacrolimus medication can be an alternative for de novo renal transplantation recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾移植受者每日一次缓释他克莫司与每日两次他克莫司的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
背景:肾移植是终末期肾脏疾病最重要的治疗方法。免疫抑制疗法可以预防肾移植受者的急性排斥反应。他克莫司通常用于预防移植后的排斥反应。先前的研究表明,每日一次的他克莫司可以改善药物依从性。因此,本荟萃分析旨在比较每日一次和每日两次他克莫司治疗新肾移植患者的临床结果。方法:从Cochrane图书馆数据库、PubMed和Embase中筛选出符合条件的研究,直至2022年7月。这些随机对照试验(rct)评估每日一次与每日两次他克莫司制剂在新生肾移植中的应用。使用随机效应模型估计总风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)。结果:共纳入9项rct。每日一次他克莫司和每日两次他克莫司患者活检证实的急性排斥反应率无差异(RR, 0.91;95% CI, 0.73-1.13)。在肾功能方面,每日1次和每日2次他克莫司组之间无显著差异(SMD, -0.03;95% CI, -0.12 ~ 0.07)。此外,他克莫司每日1次组和每日2次组第一年移植物衰竭、死亡和不良事件的风险相似。结论:我们的主要研究结果表明,移植后立即接受每日一次他克莫司的新生肾移植受者与每日两次他克莫司的受者具有相当的疗效和安全性。因此,每日一次的他克莫司治疗可作为新肾移植受者的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
The impact of serum estradiol and progesterone levels during implantation on obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer. Validation of traditional Chinese version of Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care Questionnaire in Taiwanese patients. Multilineage differentiation potential in the infant adipose- and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Winners of the 2022 honor awards for excellence at the annual meeting of the Chinese Medical Association-Taipei: Part III. Electrophysiological status indexed by early changes in impedance after cochlear implantation: A literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1