Validation of traditional Chinese version of Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care Questionnaire in Taiwanese patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Chinese Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000993
Ming-Chieh Tsai, Yun-Yun Chou, El-Wui Loh, Ashleigh Peng Lin, Hsueh-Chi Wu, Li-Sin Hsiao, Chia-Li Chang, Shu-Fen Chen, Sam H Ahmedzai, Ka-Wai Tam
{"title":"Validation of traditional Chinese version of Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care Questionnaire in Taiwanese patients.","authors":"Ming-Chieh Tsai, Yun-Yun Chou, El-Wui Loh, Ashleigh Peng Lin, Hsueh-Chi Wu, Li-Sin Hsiao, Chia-Li Chang, Shu-Fen Chen, Sam H Ahmedzai, Ka-Wai Tam","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Holistic health care considers all aspects of patient care, namely the physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects. To assess which patient needs are unmet, a screening questionnaire covering the four aforementioned aspects is required. Therefore, the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC), a multidimensional, self-reported questionnaire designed to screen patients regardless of diagnosis, was developed. This study developed a translated and validated traditional Chinese version of the SPARC for patients in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original English version of the SPARC was translated into a traditional Chinese version (SPARC-T) through forward-backward translation. Semistructured debriefing interviews were conducted with participants to evaluate the SPARC-T. The reliability and validity of the SPARC-T were assessed through Cronbach's alpha coefficients and a correlation analysis conducted using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were enrolled from our hospital: 22 had cancer but the majority had nonmalignant chronic conditions. About internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha values for all domains of the SPARC-T were favorable. A correlation analysis of the SPARC-T and FACT-G revealed significant correlations for the domains of physical symptoms, independence and activity, family and social issues, sleep, and treatment issues; no significant correlation was identified for the \"psychological issues\" domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that the SPARC-T is an effective tool for screening Mandarin-speaking patients. Thus, it can be used in hospitals to holistically screen and identify the needs of patients to ensure they can receive appropriate professional support and holistic health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Holistic health care considers all aspects of patient care, namely the physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects. To assess which patient needs are unmet, a screening questionnaire covering the four aforementioned aspects is required. Therefore, the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC), a multidimensional, self-reported questionnaire designed to screen patients regardless of diagnosis, was developed. This study developed a translated and validated traditional Chinese version of the SPARC for patients in Taiwan.

Methods: The original English version of the SPARC was translated into a traditional Chinese version (SPARC-T) through forward-backward translation. Semistructured debriefing interviews were conducted with participants to evaluate the SPARC-T. The reliability and validity of the SPARC-T were assessed through Cronbach's alpha coefficients and a correlation analysis conducted using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire.

Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled from our hospital: 22 had cancer but the majority had nonmalignant chronic conditions. About internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha values for all domains of the SPARC-T were favorable. A correlation analysis of the SPARC-T and FACT-G revealed significant correlations for the domains of physical symptoms, independence and activity, family and social issues, sleep, and treatment issues; no significant correlation was identified for the "psychological issues" domain.

Conclusion: This study revealed that the SPARC-T is an effective tool for screening Mandarin-speaking patients. Thus, it can be used in hospitals to holistically screen and identify the needs of patients to ensure they can receive appropriate professional support and holistic health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在台湾患者中验证谢菲尔德评估和转介护理问卷的繁体中文版。
背景:整体医疗考虑了患者护理的各个方面,即身体、心理、精神和社会方面。为了评估哪些病人的需求未得到满足,需要一份涵盖上述四个方面的筛查问卷。因此,谢菲尔德护理评估和转介概况(SPARC)应运而生,这是一份多维度的自我报告问卷,旨在筛查患者,无论其诊断结果如何。本研究为台湾患者开发了 SPARC 的繁体中文翻译和验证版本:方法:通过前后向翻译,将 SPARC 的英文原版翻译成繁体中文版(SPARC-T)。对参与者进行了半结构式汇报访谈,以评估 SPARC-T。通过Cronbach's alpha系数评估了SPARC-T的信度和效度,并使用癌症治疗功能评估(FACT-G)问卷进行了相关分析:本医院共招募了 53 名患者,其中 22 人患有癌症,但大多数人患有非恶性慢性疾病。在内部一致性方面,SPARC-T 各领域的 Cronbach's alpha 值均良好。SPARC-T和FACT-G的相关性分析显示,身体症状、独立性和活动能力、家庭和社会问题、睡眠和治疗问题等领域存在显著相关性;"心理问题 "领域没有发现显著相关性:本研究表明,SPARC-T 是筛查普通话患者的有效工具。结论:本研究表明,SPARC-T 是筛查普通话患者的有效工具,因此可用于医院全面筛查和识别患者的需求,以确保他们能够获得适当的专业支持和全面的医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
The expected changes with different periods of home-based resistance exercise in patients with chronic kidney disease Effectiveness of early palliative care in patients with head and neck cancer in Taiwan The impact of serum estradiol and progesterone levels during implantation on obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in frozen embryo transfer. Validation of traditional Chinese version of Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care Questionnaire in Taiwanese patients. Multilineage differentiation potential in the infant adipose- and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1