Systemic corticosteroids in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis-A systematic review.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2023.2240511
Sarah Tamene, Kim Dalhoff, Peter Schwarz, Vibeke Backer, Kasper Aanaes
{"title":"Systemic corticosteroids in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis-A systematic review.","authors":"Sarah Tamene,&nbsp;Kim Dalhoff,&nbsp;Peter Schwarz,&nbsp;Vibeke Backer,&nbsp;Kasper Aanaes","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2023.2240511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When first-line chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treatment fails, patients can either be treated with oral or injected systemic corticosteroids. Although the EPOS and international guidelines for CRS do not mention injected corticosteroids, it is commonly used by ear, nose, and throat specialists. While the risks of systemic corticosteroids, in general, are known, the pros and cons of injected and oral corticosteroids (OCS) in CRS treatment are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies that report the effects and/or side effects of injected and oral corticosteroids in the treatment of CRS was made according to the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 48 studies were included, only five studies reported on injected corticosteroids, and five attended with side effects. Three studies found beneficial effects of OCS perioperatively on sinus surgery, while four articles found no effect. Nineteen articles reported that OCS resulted in an improvement in symptoms. Two articles presented a longer-lasting effect of injected corticosteroids than OCS. Three studies reported adverse side effects of systemic corticosteroids, while two studies showed no adverse side effects. One study showed less adrenal suppression after injected corticosteroids compared to OCS. The evidence is not strong but shows a positive effect of systemic corticosteroids that lasts longer with injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat CRS, there is a lack of studies comparing the OCS and injected corticosteroids. The evidence is sparse, however, injected steroids show longer effects with fewer side effects. An RCT study is needed to compare OCS and injected corticosteroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"2240511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/64/ZECR_10_2240511.PMC10405757.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2240511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: When first-line chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) treatment fails, patients can either be treated with oral or injected systemic corticosteroids. Although the EPOS and international guidelines for CRS do not mention injected corticosteroids, it is commonly used by ear, nose, and throat specialists. While the risks of systemic corticosteroids, in general, are known, the pros and cons of injected and oral corticosteroids (OCS) in CRS treatment are unclear.

Methods: A systematic review of studies that report the effects and/or side effects of injected and oral corticosteroids in the treatment of CRS was made according to the PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Altogether, 48 studies were included, only five studies reported on injected corticosteroids, and five attended with side effects. Three studies found beneficial effects of OCS perioperatively on sinus surgery, while four articles found no effect. Nineteen articles reported that OCS resulted in an improvement in symptoms. Two articles presented a longer-lasting effect of injected corticosteroids than OCS. Three studies reported adverse side effects of systemic corticosteroids, while two studies showed no adverse side effects. One study showed less adrenal suppression after injected corticosteroids compared to OCS. The evidence is not strong but shows a positive effect of systemic corticosteroids that lasts longer with injections.

Conclusion: Although systemic corticosteroids are widely used to treat CRS, there is a lack of studies comparing the OCS and injected corticosteroids. The evidence is sparse, however, injected steroids show longer effects with fewer side effects. An RCT study is needed to compare OCS and injected corticosteroids.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性糖皮质激素治疗慢性鼻窦炎的系统综述。
目的:当一线慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)治疗失败时,患者可以口服或全身注射皮质类固醇治疗。虽然EPOS和国际CRS指南没有提到注射皮质类固醇,但耳鼻喉科专家通常使用它。虽然全身皮质类固醇的风险通常是已知的,但注射和口服皮质类固醇(OCS)治疗CRS的利弊尚不清楚。方法:根据PRISMA指南对报告注射和口服皮质类固醇治疗CRS的作用和/或副作用的研究进行系统回顾。结果:总共纳入48项研究,只有5项研究报告了注射皮质类固醇,5项研究报告了副作用。3篇研究发现围手术期OCS对鼻窦手术有有益作用,4篇研究发现无效果。19篇文章报道了OCS导致症状的改善。两篇文章报道了注射皮质类固醇比OCS更持久的效果。三项研究报告了全身性皮质类固醇的不良副作用,而两项研究显示没有不良副作用。一项研究显示,与OCS相比,注射皮质类固醇后肾上腺抑制更少。虽然证据不充分,但表明全身皮质类固醇注射的积极作用持续时间更长。结论:虽然全身糖皮质激素被广泛用于治疗CRS,但OCS与注射糖皮质激素的比较研究尚缺乏。然而,很少有证据表明,注射类固醇的作用时间更长,副作用更少。需要一项RCT研究来比较OCS和注射皮质类固醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish. Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. Socioeconomic status and emergency department visits in adults with a history of severe childhood asthma: a register-based study. Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1