The Utility of Telemedicine in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Provider and Patient Perspectives.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Brandon Alba, Sydney H Arnold, Charalampos Siotos, Mark Hansdorfer, Amir Aminzada, Amir Dorafshar, Keith Hood
{"title":"The Utility of Telemedicine in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Provider and Patient Perspectives.","authors":"Brandon Alba,&nbsp;Sydney H Arnold,&nbsp;Charalampos Siotos,&nbsp;Mark Hansdorfer,&nbsp;Amir Aminzada,&nbsp;Amir Dorafshar,&nbsp;Keith Hood","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of telemedicine has become increasingly common, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual visits can be beneficial for use in plastic surgery but are not without limitations. The purpose of this study was to better understand the utility of telemedicine in plastic surgery from both patient and provider perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to all patients who had a telemedicine visit at the authors' institution from April to October 2020 as well as a representative cohort of providers via the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. The survey collected various demographic data and included a Likert scale questionnaire to assess the use and overall quality of telemedicine services. Data collected for the patient and provider groups were compared using <i>t</i> tests, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney (<i>U</i>) tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients (N = 501; 13.4%) and 160 providers (N = 2701; 5.9%) responded to the survey. Patients were significantly younger than providers (45.8 ± 11.8 vs 55.0 ± 11.6 years; <i>P</i> < .001). Patients responded significantly more favorably than providers in the domains of telemedicine usefulness, ease of use, interaction quality, and reliability. Patients were significantly more comfortable than providers in scheduling surgery without an in-person visit. Patients also rated higher comfort levels than providers with a virtual physical examination, including examination of sensitive body parts, such as breasts and genitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plastic surgery patients are generally comfortable and satisfied with the care provided by telemedicine. Telemedicine can provide high-quality health care and can be utilized by plastic surgeons to optimize care in their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10350872/pdf/eplasty-23-e35.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of telemedicine has become increasingly common, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual visits can be beneficial for use in plastic surgery but are not without limitations. The purpose of this study was to better understand the utility of telemedicine in plastic surgery from both patient and provider perspectives.

Methods: A survey was distributed to all patients who had a telemedicine visit at the authors' institution from April to October 2020 as well as a representative cohort of providers via the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. The survey collected various demographic data and included a Likert scale questionnaire to assess the use and overall quality of telemedicine services. Data collected for the patient and provider groups were compared using t tests, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney (U) tests.

Results: A total of 67 patients (N = 501; 13.4%) and 160 providers (N = 2701; 5.9%) responded to the survey. Patients were significantly younger than providers (45.8 ± 11.8 vs 55.0 ± 11.6 years; P < .001). Patients responded significantly more favorably than providers in the domains of telemedicine usefulness, ease of use, interaction quality, and reliability. Patients were significantly more comfortable than providers in scheduling surgery without an in-person visit. Patients also rated higher comfort levels than providers with a virtual physical examination, including examination of sensitive body parts, such as breasts and genitals.

Conclusions: Plastic surgery patients are generally comfortable and satisfied with the care provided by telemedicine. Telemedicine can provide high-quality health care and can be utilized by plastic surgeons to optimize care in their practice.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗在整形和重建手术中的应用:提供者和患者的观点。
背景:远程医疗的使用越来越普遍,特别是自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来。虚拟访问在整形手术中的应用是有益的,但并非没有限制。本研究的目的是为了从患者和提供者的角度更好地了解远程医疗在整形手术中的应用。方法:通过美国整形外科学会对2020年4月至10月在作者所在机构进行远程医疗访问的所有患者以及具有代表性的提供者队列进行调查。该调查收集了各种人口统计数据,并包括李克特量表问卷,以评估远程医疗服务的使用和整体质量。使用t检验、卡方检验和Mann-Whitney (U)检验对患者组和提供者组收集的数据进行比较。结果:共67例患者(N = 501;13.4%)和160名提供者(N = 2701;5.9%)回应调查。患者明显比提供者年轻(45.8±11.8 vs 55.0±11.6岁;P < 0.001)。在远程医疗的实用性、易用性、交互质量和可靠性方面,患者的反应明显优于提供者。在安排手术时,患者明显比提供者更舒适,而不需要亲自就诊。在虚拟体检方面,患者的舒适度也高于医疗服务提供者,虚拟体检包括对乳房和生殖器等敏感身体部位的检查。结论:整形手术患者普遍对远程医疗服务感到舒适和满意。远程医疗可以提供高质量的医疗保健,并且可以被整形外科医生用来优化他们在实践中的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1