Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Nikita Kadakia, Austin R Swisher, Priya G Lewis, Mark J Landau, Jeremy Kubiak, Waseem Mohiuddin, Hahns Y Kim
{"title":"Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?","authors":"Nikita Kadakia,&nbsp;Austin R Swisher,&nbsp;Priya G Lewis,&nbsp;Mark J Landau,&nbsp;Jeremy Kubiak,&nbsp;Waseem Mohiuddin,&nbsp;Hahns Y Kim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increased adoption of skin-sparing mastectomies, immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction is a common option for breast cancer patients. During the first stage of the procedure with tissue expander placement, higher intraoperative percent fill has been identified as a risk factor for complications. However, the postoperative outcomes of higher intraoperative fill volumes are not well established. The authors sought to evaluate if a higher initial intraoperative tissue expander fill volume is associated with higher complication rates in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander placement from 2016 to 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics and perioperative data were recorded. Large intraoperative fill was defined as saline fill volume greater than 350 mL. The primary outcome evaluated was skin and nipple necrosis. Secondary outcomes were major infections, minor infections, seroma, and hematoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 breasts in 86 patients were included. Mean intraoperative fill volume was 246.4 ± 106.6 mL. Thirty-five tissue expanders were filled with greater than 350 mL of saline intraoperatively. Patients with large intraoperative fill volume were older (mean age, 52.6 vs 47.9 years; <i>P</i> = .04), had a higher mean body mass index (BMI; 33.2 vs 25.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> < .0001), and had larger preoperative breast anthropometrics (<i>P</i> < .0001). During a mean follow-up period of 20.1 months (range, 3-55 months), 9 breasts were noted to have skin/nipple necrosis. After multivariate analysis, large tissue expander fill volume was not a significant predictor of skin or nipple necrosis (<i>P</i> = .62). Hypertension and anticoagulant use were associated with increased skin and nipple necrosis (<i>P</i> = .04 and <i>P</i> = .03, respectively). Large fill volume was not associated with statistically significant increases in rates of other complications like major infections, minor infections, seroma, or hematoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger fill volumes are often required and benefit patients with higher BMI or bra sizes. This also reduces the number of postoperative fills required. In this patient population, larger intraoperative tissue expander saline fill volume (greater than 350 mL) was not associated with increased postoperative complications. After careful patient selection and perfusion evaluation, larger fill volumes may be considered a safe option to improve the aesthetic outcomes in patients with high BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008373/pdf/eplasty-23-e12.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increased adoption of skin-sparing mastectomies, immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction is a common option for breast cancer patients. During the first stage of the procedure with tissue expander placement, higher intraoperative percent fill has been identified as a risk factor for complications. However, the postoperative outcomes of higher intraoperative fill volumes are not well established. The authors sought to evaluate if a higher initial intraoperative tissue expander fill volume is associated with higher complication rates in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander placement.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander placement from 2016 to 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics and perioperative data were recorded. Large intraoperative fill was defined as saline fill volume greater than 350 mL. The primary outcome evaluated was skin and nipple necrosis. Secondary outcomes were major infections, minor infections, seroma, and hematoma.

Results: A total of 147 breasts in 86 patients were included. Mean intraoperative fill volume was 246.4 ± 106.6 mL. Thirty-five tissue expanders were filled with greater than 350 mL of saline intraoperatively. Patients with large intraoperative fill volume were older (mean age, 52.6 vs 47.9 years; P = .04), had a higher mean body mass index (BMI; 33.2 vs 25.9 kg/m2; P < .0001), and had larger preoperative breast anthropometrics (P < .0001). During a mean follow-up period of 20.1 months (range, 3-55 months), 9 breasts were noted to have skin/nipple necrosis. After multivariate analysis, large tissue expander fill volume was not a significant predictor of skin or nipple necrosis (P = .62). Hypertension and anticoagulant use were associated with increased skin and nipple necrosis (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). Large fill volume was not associated with statistically significant increases in rates of other complications like major infections, minor infections, seroma, or hematoma.

Conclusions: Larger fill volumes are often required and benefit patients with higher BMI or bra sizes. This also reduces the number of postoperative fills required. In this patient population, larger intraoperative tissue expander saline fill volume (greater than 350 mL) was not associated with increased postoperative complications. After careful patient selection and perfusion evaluation, larger fill volumes may be considered a safe option to improve the aesthetic outcomes in patients with high BMI.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中填充量大是否与组织扩张器置入后并发症增加有关?
背景:随着保留皮肤的乳房切除术的采用越来越多,立即二期乳房重建是乳腺癌患者的常见选择。在放置组织扩张器的手术的第一阶段,较高的术中填充率已被确定为并发症的危险因素。然而,术中填充体积增大的术后结果尚未得到很好的确定。作者试图评估是否较高的初始术中组织扩张器填充量与组织扩张器放置的立即乳房重建患者较高的并发症发生率相关。方法:回顾性分析2016年至2018年行组织扩张器置入术的即刻乳房再造术患者。记录患者人口统计学和围手术期数据。术中填充量大定义为生理盐水填充量大于350 mL。评估的主要结果是皮肤和乳头坏死。次要结局为严重感染、轻微感染、血肿和血肿。结果:共纳入86例患者147个乳房。平均术中填充量为246.4±106.6 mL。35个组织扩张器术中填充大于350ml的生理盐水。术中填充量较大的患者年龄较大(平均年龄52.6岁vs 47.9岁;P = .04),平均体重指数(BMI;33.2 vs 25.9 kg/m2;P < 0.0001),术前乳房人体测量值较大(P < 0.0001)。在平均20.1个月的随访期间(范围3-55个月),9个乳房出现皮肤/乳头坏死。多变量分析后,较大的组织扩张器填充量并不是皮肤或乳头坏死的显著预测因子(P = 0.62)。高血压和抗凝剂的使用与皮肤和乳头坏死增加相关(P = 0.04和P = 0.03)。大填充量与其他并发症如严重感染、轻微感染、血肿或血肿发生率的统计学显著增加无关。结论:通常需要较大的填充量,并且有利于BMI或胸罩尺寸较高的患者。这也减少了术后所需的补牙次数。在该患者群体中,术中较大的组织扩张器生理盐水填充量(大于350ml)与术后并发症的增加无关。在仔细的患者选择和灌注评估后,更大的填充体积可以被认为是一个安全的选择,以改善高BMI患者的美学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1