Efficacy and Safety of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Plus Anti-CD20 Antibody Therapy Compared With Chemoimmunotherapy as Front-line Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000471
Thi Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Van Khoi Tran, Nguyen Van Cau, Chiou-Feng Lin
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Plus Anti-CD20 Antibody Therapy Compared With Chemoimmunotherapy as Front-line Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Thi Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Van Khoi Tran, Nguyen Van Cau, Chiou-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1097/CJI.0000000000000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) is considered an appropriate front-line treatment option for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, outcomes remain suboptimal. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) combined with anti-CD20 antibody is an effective treatment for treatment-naïve, relapsed/refractory CLL patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of CIT versus BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody as front-line treatment for CLL patients. The endpoints of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and safety. Four trials (including 1479 patients) were available as of December 2022 and fulfilled the eligibility criteria. BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody treatment significantly prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.42] compared with CIT, while the combination therapy did not significantly improve OS compared with CIT (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.06). We observed consistent benefits for PFS among patients with unfavorable features. Although pooled analysis indicated that the addition of BTKi to anti-CD20 antibody led to a higher ORR than CIT [risk ratio (RR), 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13-1.20], there was no difference in CR between the two arms (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.27-4.55). The risk of grade ≥3 adverse effects (AE) was comparable between the two groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). The BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody therapy has superior outcomes compared with CIT among patients with treatment-naïve CLL, without excess of toxicity. Future studies should compare next-generation targeted agent combinations versus CIT to determine the optimal management of CLL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy","volume":"46 8","pages":"299-309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) is considered an appropriate front-line treatment option for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, outcomes remain suboptimal. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) combined with anti-CD20 antibody is an effective treatment for treatment-naïve, relapsed/refractory CLL patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of CIT versus BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody as front-line treatment for CLL patients. The endpoints of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and safety. Four trials (including 1479 patients) were available as of December 2022 and fulfilled the eligibility criteria. BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody treatment significantly prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.42] compared with CIT, while the combination therapy did not significantly improve OS compared with CIT (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.50-1.06). We observed consistent benefits for PFS among patients with unfavorable features. Although pooled analysis indicated that the addition of BTKi to anti-CD20 antibody led to a higher ORR than CIT [risk ratio (RR), 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13-1.20], there was no difference in CR between the two arms (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.27-4.55). The risk of grade ≥3 adverse effects (AE) was comparable between the two groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). The BTKi + anti-CD20 antibody therapy has superior outcomes compared with CIT among patients with treatment-naïve CLL, without excess of toxicity. Future studies should compare next-generation targeted agent combinations versus CIT to determine the optimal management of CLL patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bruton酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合抗CD20抗体治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效和安全性与化学免疫疗法作为一线治疗的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
化学免疫疗法(CIT)被认为是治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的合适的一线治疗选择。然而,结果仍然不理想。Bruton酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)联合抗CD20抗体是治疗幼稚、复发/难治性CLL患者的有效方法。对随机对照试验进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,以比较CIT与BTKi+抗CD20抗体作为CLL患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性。感兴趣的终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、总有效率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CR)和安全性。截至2022年12月,已有四项试验(包括1479名患者)符合资格标准。BTKi+抗CD20抗体治疗显著延长PFS[风险比(HR),0.25;95%置信区间(CI),0.15-0.42],与CIT相比,而联合治疗并没有显著改善OS(HR,0.73;95%CI,0.50-1.06)。尽管汇总分析表明,将BTKi添加到抗CD20抗体中导致比CIT更高的ORR[风险比(RR),1.16;95%CI,1.13-1.20],两组之间的CR没有差异(RR,1.10;95%CI,0.27-4.55)。两组之间发生≥3级不良反应(AE)的风险具有可比性(RR,1.04;95%CI,0.92-1.17)。在治疗早期CLL的患者中,BTKi+抗CD20抗体治疗的结果优于CIT,没有过度毒性。未来的研究应将下一代靶向药物组合与CIT进行比较,以确定CLL患者的最佳管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotherapy
Journal of Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunotherapy features rapid publication of articles on immunomodulators, lymphokines, antibodies, cells, and cell products in cancer biology and therapy. Laboratory and preclinical studies, as well as investigative clinical reports, are presented. The journal emphasizes basic mechanisms and methods for the rapid transfer of technology from the laboratory to the clinic. JIT contains full-length articles, review articles, and short communications.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Analysis of a Dendritic Cell Marker Genes Signature to Predict Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response in Lung Adenocarcinoma. RAD51 Expression as a Biomarker to Predict Efficacy of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and PD-L1 Blockade for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Corneal Transplant Rejection Following Durvalumab Therapy in a Patient With NSCLC: A Case Report. Brief Communication on MAGE-A4 and Coexpression of Cancer Testis Antigens in Metastatic Synovial Sarcomas: Considerations for Development of Immunotherapeutics. Brief Communication: Combination of an MIP3α-Antigen Fusion Therapeutic DNA Vaccine With Treatments of IFNα and 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine Enhances Activated Effector CD8+ T Cells Expressing CD11c in the B16F10 Melanoma Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1