Strategic planning of operating room session allocation using stability analysis.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2021.1997651
Shiva Faeghi, Kunibert Lennerts, Stefan Nickel
{"title":"Strategic planning of operating room session allocation using stability analysis.","authors":"Shiva Faeghi,&nbsp;Kunibert Lennerts,&nbsp;Stefan Nickel","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2021.1997651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operating room (OR) resources are limited, and for this reason there is usually a competition among surgeons to win them. However, the methods developed for allocating OR sessions are mostly based on optimisation methods which compensate the preferences of surgeons or surgical specialities in favour of the productivity of the entire OR department. This leads to conflict and dissatisfaction among surgeons. To overcome this problem, a methodology based on game theoretic solutions is presented in this paper that formulates the allocation problem as a simple game. The surgeons or specialities as players then jointly pursue the goal of achieving overall stability. Stability is defined and measured using a method called Power Index. The proposed method is then combined with the Monte-Carlo technique to deal with uncertainties. To demonstrate the capability of the suggested procedures, they are applied to a case study from the literature and a set of hypothetical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"12 2","pages":"167-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208130/pdf/THSS_12_1997651.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2021.1997651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Operating room (OR) resources are limited, and for this reason there is usually a competition among surgeons to win them. However, the methods developed for allocating OR sessions are mostly based on optimisation methods which compensate the preferences of surgeons or surgical specialities in favour of the productivity of the entire OR department. This leads to conflict and dissatisfaction among surgeons. To overcome this problem, a methodology based on game theoretic solutions is presented in this paper that formulates the allocation problem as a simple game. The surgeons or specialities as players then jointly pursue the goal of achieving overall stability. Stability is defined and measured using a method called Power Index. The proposed method is then combined with the Monte-Carlo technique to deal with uncertainties. To demonstrate the capability of the suggested procedures, they are applied to a case study from the literature and a set of hypothetical scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于稳定性分析的手术室会期分配策略规划。
手术室(OR)资源有限,因此外科医生之间通常会竞争以赢得资源。然而,用于分配手术室时段的方法大多基于优化方法,这些方法补偿了外科医生或外科专业的偏好,从而有利于整个手术室部门的生产力。这导致了外科医生之间的冲突和不满。为了克服这一问题,本文提出了一种基于博弈论解的方法,将分配问题表述为一个简单的博弈。作为球员的外科医生或专家共同追求实现整体稳定的目标。稳定性是用一种叫做功率指数的方法来定义和测量的。然后将该方法与蒙特卡罗技术相结合来处理不确定性。为了证明建议的程序的能力,将它们应用于文献中的一个案例研究和一组假设的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Towards new frontiers of healthcare systems research using artificial intelligence and generative AI. Assistance systems for patient positioning in radiotherapy practice. Resilience of hospitals in an age of disruptions: a systematic literature review on resources and capabilities. From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design. Using participatory systems approaches to improve healthcare delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1