Intravenous antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic appendectomy in acute complicated appendicitis: the patient clinical response is the key.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Cirugia Y Cirujanos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.21000557
Andres Mendoza-Zuchini, Laura C Arce-Polania, Carlos J Pérez-Rivera
{"title":"Intravenous antibiotic therapy after laparoscopic appendectomy in acute complicated appendicitis: the patient clinical response is the key.","authors":"Andres Mendoza-Zuchini,&nbsp;Laura C Arce-Polania,&nbsp;Carlos J Pérez-Rivera","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.21000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The guidelines about acute complicated appendicitis (ACA) recommend 3-5 days of postoperative intravenous antibiotics (IVA). Nevertheless, the time selected by the surgeon can vary according to patient clinical response, ACA type, and professional experience. Once an adequate clinical response is obtained, the change from IVA to oral antibiotic (OA) could be realized without the waiting time established with satisfactory results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine if a short course of IVA and/or switch to oral route is safe based on the patient clinical response.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Observational prospective cohort study from a general surgery reference center database since July 2019.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>48 patients with ACA intraoperative findings were included. Regarding postoperative antibiotic management, only preoperative IVA: 7 (14.58%), IVA 1-3 days: 1 (20.83%), IVA 1-3 days and change to OA: 21 (43.75%), IVA > 3 days: 6 (12.5%), and only OA: 3 (27.08%). The bivariate analysis did not show statistically significant differences in reconsultation (p = 0.81), rehospitalization (p = 0.44), and surgical site infection (p = 0.56) between the antibiotic scheme based on the postoperative clinical response and the traditional one regarding intra-abdominal collection rate, the hospital stays, and hospitalization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 4","pages":"479-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The guidelines about acute complicated appendicitis (ACA) recommend 3-5 days of postoperative intravenous antibiotics (IVA). Nevertheless, the time selected by the surgeon can vary according to patient clinical response, ACA type, and professional experience. Once an adequate clinical response is obtained, the change from IVA to oral antibiotic (OA) could be realized without the waiting time established with satisfactory results.

Objective: Determine if a short course of IVA and/or switch to oral route is safe based on the patient clinical response.

Materials and methods: Observational prospective cohort study from a general surgery reference center database since July 2019.

Results and conclusion: 48 patients with ACA intraoperative findings were included. Regarding postoperative antibiotic management, only preoperative IVA: 7 (14.58%), IVA 1-3 days: 1 (20.83%), IVA 1-3 days and change to OA: 21 (43.75%), IVA > 3 days: 6 (12.5%), and only OA: 3 (27.08%). The bivariate analysis did not show statistically significant differences in reconsultation (p = 0.81), rehospitalization (p = 0.44), and surgical site infection (p = 0.56) between the antibiotic scheme based on the postoperative clinical response and the traditional one regarding intra-abdominal collection rate, the hospital stays, and hospitalization costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜阑尾切除术后静脉抗生素治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎:患者的临床反应是关键。
引言:关于急性复杂性阑尾炎(ACA)的指南建议术后3-5天静脉注射抗生素(IVA)。然而,外科医生选择的时间可能会根据患者的临床反应、ACA类型和专业经验而有所不同。一旦获得足够的临床反应,就可以实现从IVA到口服抗生素(OA)的转变,而无需建立令人满意的等待时间。目的:根据患者的临床反应,确定短期IVA和/或改用口服途径是否安全。材料和方法:自2019年7月以来,来自普通外科参考中心数据库的观察性前瞻性队列研究。结果和结论:包括48名ACA术中发现的患者。关于术后抗生素管理,只有术前IVA:7(14.58%),IVA1-3天:1(20.83%),IVA1-3天和转变为OA:21(43.75%),IVAC>3天:6(12.5%),只有OA:3(27.08%)。双变量分析在再咨询(p=0.81)、再住院(p=0.44)、,基于术后临床反应的抗生素方案与传统方案在腹腔内收集率、住院时间和住院费用方面的手术部位感染(p=0.56)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and radiological assessment of vascular anatomy in patients who underwent D3 left hemicolectomy. A model to determine factors influencing intraoperative complications in sleeve gastrectomy. [Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: does surgical margin impact survival?] Relación preoperatoria de neutrófilos a proteína C reactiva como predictor de complicaciones posoperatorias del cáncer de pancreas ¿La vía de señalización de sonic hedgehog desempeña un papel en el mecanismo antirreflujo de la vejiga en los niños?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1