Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Delirium and Neurological Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Delirium and Neurological Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tingting Liu, Xinling Liu, Rong Wan","doi":"10.59958/hsf.5875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) and neurological dysfunction are very common following cardiac surgery and deteriorate the patient's prognosis and the outcome of surgical procedures. A clinically effective management strategy or drug is not yet available for POD. Additionally, it is unknown whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has neuroprotective and anti-delirium benefits in patients who undergo cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined whether RIPC can improve POD and neurological function in cardiac surgery patients. We screened 510 consecutive adult patients aged 18 and older who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. Then, 448 of these patients were recruited in the trial as the intention to treat (ITT) group, who were then randomly assigned to receive either a control (n = 223) or RIPC treatment (n = 225). The primary outcome measures were hospitalization postoperative delirium, six-month modified Rankins scale (mRS), hospital cerebral infarction, 30-day overall mortality, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b levels, related adverse effects, hospital costs, and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant variation was not observed between the two groups in terms of the baseline clinical data. In contrast to the control group, the POD in the RIPC group was considerably alleviated. RIPC treatment also decreased the levels of NSE and S-100b, which alleviated nerve injury. The adverse impacts of RIPC-induced objective indicators of tissue or neurovascular damage were similar in both groups, showing no significant variations between the two. The hospital stays and hospitalization costs also decreased significantly in the RIPC-treated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings suggested that RIPC may benefit cardiac surgery patients by reducing POD, alleviating injury, and lowering hospital expenditures and length of stay. Cardiac surgery patients can be treated with RIPC, which is an effective and safe technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":51056,"journal":{"name":"Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"26 4","pages":"E408-E416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.5875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) and neurological dysfunction are very common following cardiac surgery and deteriorate the patient's prognosis and the outcome of surgical procedures. A clinically effective management strategy or drug is not yet available for POD. Additionally, it is unknown whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has neuroprotective and anti-delirium benefits in patients who undergo cardiac surgery.
Methods: This study examined whether RIPC can improve POD and neurological function in cardiac surgery patients. We screened 510 consecutive adult patients aged 18 and older who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. Then, 448 of these patients were recruited in the trial as the intention to treat (ITT) group, who were then randomly assigned to receive either a control (n = 223) or RIPC treatment (n = 225). The primary outcome measures were hospitalization postoperative delirium, six-month modified Rankins scale (mRS), hospital cerebral infarction, 30-day overall mortality, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b levels, related adverse effects, hospital costs, and hospital stay.
Results: A statistically significant variation was not observed between the two groups in terms of the baseline clinical data. In contrast to the control group, the POD in the RIPC group was considerably alleviated. RIPC treatment also decreased the levels of NSE and S-100b, which alleviated nerve injury. The adverse impacts of RIPC-induced objective indicators of tissue or neurovascular damage were similar in both groups, showing no significant variations between the two. The hospital stays and hospitalization costs also decreased significantly in the RIPC-treated patients.
Conclusion: The study findings suggested that RIPC may benefit cardiac surgery patients by reducing POD, alleviating injury, and lowering hospital expenditures and length of stay. Cardiac surgery patients can be treated with RIPC, which is an effective and safe technique.
期刊介绍:
The Heart Surgery Forum® is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal seeking original investigative and clinical work on any subject germane to the science or practice of modern cardiac care. The HSF publishes original scientific reports, collective reviews, case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. New manuscripts are reviewed by reviewers for originality, content, relevancy and adherence to scientific principles in a double-blind process. The HSF features a streamlined submission and peer review process with an anticipated completion time of 30 to 60 days from the date of receipt of the original manuscript. Authors are encouraged to submit full color images and video that will be included in the web version of the journal at no charge.