Studying the Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Web-based Lethal Means Safety Decision Aid for Hospitalized Adults With Suicide Risk (Lock to Live).

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychiatric Practice Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000718
Mandeep Singh, Brian Levins, William V McCall, Michael Anderson, Erik Olsen, Victoria Yee, Michaela Cushing, E Vanessa Spearman-McCarthy
{"title":"Studying the Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Web-based Lethal Means Safety Decision Aid for Hospitalized Adults With Suicide Risk (Lock to Live).","authors":"Mandeep Singh, Brian Levins, William V McCall, Michael Anderson, Erik Olsen, Victoria Yee, Michaela Cushing, E Vanessa Spearman-McCarthy","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lock to Live is an interactive web-based lethal means safety decision aid that promotes temporary storage of firearms and medications. It has primarily been provided to suicidal patients in emergency department settings. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Lock to Live decision aid with hospitalized adults at increased risk of suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects provided demographic information and completed the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale after which they completed the Lock to Live program followed by a survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants were recruited for this study, 5 of whom had access to firearms and 19 of whom had access to medications. Lock to Live was feasible to use as the mean length of time to complete the program was 10.0±5.3 minutes. It was acceptable to most participants as 75% of participants found it to be easy to use, and 65% of participants agreed that Lock to Live was helpful in making a decision about changing access to firearms/medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lock 2 Live decision aid appears to be a feasible and acceptable tool for hospitalized patients at risk for suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lock to Live is an interactive web-based lethal means safety decision aid that promotes temporary storage of firearms and medications. It has primarily been provided to suicidal patients in emergency department settings. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Lock to Live decision aid with hospitalized adults at increased risk of suicide.

Methods: Subjects provided demographic information and completed the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale after which they completed the Lock to Live program followed by a survey.

Results: Twenty participants were recruited for this study, 5 of whom had access to firearms and 19 of whom had access to medications. Lock to Live was feasible to use as the mean length of time to complete the program was 10.0±5.3 minutes. It was acceptable to most participants as 75% of participants found it to be easy to use, and 65% of participants agreed that Lock to Live was helpful in making a decision about changing access to firearms/medications.

Conclusion: Lock 2 Live decision aid appears to be a feasible and acceptable tool for hospitalized patients at risk for suicide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为有自杀风险的住院成人研究基于网络的互动式致命手段安全决策辅助工具的可行性和可接受性(Lock to Live)。
目标:上锁求生 "是一种基于网络的交互式致命手段安全决策辅助工具,可促进枪支和药物的临时存放。它主要提供给急诊科有自杀倾向的病人。本研究的目的是评估 "锁住生命 "决策辅助工具对自杀风险较高的住院成人的可行性和可接受性:受试者提供人口统计学信息并完成哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表,然后完成 "锁住生命 "项目,最后进行调查:本研究共招募了 20 名参与者,其中 5 人可获得枪支,19 人可获得药物。使用 "锁住生命 "是可行的,因为完成程序的平均时间为 10.0±5.3 分钟。75%的参与者认为该程序易于使用,65%的参与者认为 "Lock to Live "有助于他们做出改变枪支/药物使用权的决定:对于有自杀风险的住院病人来说,"锁住生命 "决策辅助工具似乎是一种可行且可接受的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
期刊最新文献
"What you're born with, you die with." Half a Lifetime of Psychiatric Care for a Traumatized Young Woman With Cystic Fibrosis. Addressing the Health Needs of LGBTQ Persons in Medical Curricula: A Review of Educational Programs. Dimensionality. Good-enough Care? How Patients' Perceptions of Counselors' Professional Skills Relate to Everyday Life in Forensic Long-stay Units. Life-threatening Rash Due to Lamotrigine and a Failure to Understand Its Pharmacology: How Forensic Detective Work Uses Medical Knowledge and Clinical Pharmacology to Solve Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1