Stuttering experience of people in China: A cross-cultural perspective

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Fluency Disorders Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105994
Yan Ma , Judith D. Oxley , J. Scott Yaruss , John A. Tetnowski
{"title":"Stuttering experience of people in China: A cross-cultural perspective","authors":"Yan Ma ,&nbsp;Judith D. Oxley ,&nbsp;J. Scott Yaruss ,&nbsp;John A. Tetnowski","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study uses the Simplified Chinese version of the <em>Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering</em> for Adults (<em>OASES-A-SC</em>) to examine the stuttering experience of people in China and determine if there are differences between the data collected in China and other countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 139 responses to the <em>OASES-A-SC</em> were collected in an online self-help community of people in China who stutter. Descriptive analyses were conducted to obtain the understanding of how stuttering impacts the life experience of people in China who stutter. Comparisons were conducted regarding the groups of gender, highest education, and therapy history. Cross-cultural comparisons among the data collected from China, Australia, the Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and the USA were also conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The data for the <em>OASES-A-SC</em> showed a skewed distribution toward the severe end of the <em>OASES-A</em> impacting scale. About 93.5% participants rated the overall impact of stuttering on their life at and above the “Moderate” category. The mean scores of the General Information, Reaction to Stuttering, and Qualify of Life sections fell in the moderate-to-severe category. Compared with the data in other five countries, the Chinese data were significantly higher in the impact severity level.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results showed that people in China who stutter have more adverse experiences related to stuttering compared with their counterparts in western or developed countries. Higher negative attitudes toward stuttering in China, social stigma against people with disabilities, and the fewer professional supports were discussed to be associated with this more adverse experience. Cultural differences such as a greater power distance and higher collectivism in Chinese culture were considered to be associated with the elevated level of adverse impact of stuttering in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X23000372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study uses the Simplified Chinese version of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering for Adults (OASES-A-SC) to examine the stuttering experience of people in China and determine if there are differences between the data collected in China and other countries.

Methods

A total of 139 responses to the OASES-A-SC were collected in an online self-help community of people in China who stutter. Descriptive analyses were conducted to obtain the understanding of how stuttering impacts the life experience of people in China who stutter. Comparisons were conducted regarding the groups of gender, highest education, and therapy history. Cross-cultural comparisons among the data collected from China, Australia, the Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, and the USA were also conducted.

Results

The data for the OASES-A-SC showed a skewed distribution toward the severe end of the OASES-A impacting scale. About 93.5% participants rated the overall impact of stuttering on their life at and above the “Moderate” category. The mean scores of the General Information, Reaction to Stuttering, and Qualify of Life sections fell in the moderate-to-severe category. Compared with the data in other five countries, the Chinese data were significantly higher in the impact severity level.

Conclusion

The results showed that people in China who stutter have more adverse experiences related to stuttering compared with their counterparts in western or developed countries. Higher negative attitudes toward stuttering in China, social stigma against people with disabilities, and the fewer professional supports were discussed to be associated with this more adverse experience. Cultural differences such as a greater power distance and higher collectivism in Chinese culture were considered to be associated with the elevated level of adverse impact of stuttering in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国人口吃经历的跨文化视角
目的本研究使用简体中文版的《成年人说话者口吃经历总体评估》(OASES-A-SC)来检验中国人的口吃经历,并确定在中国收集的数据与其他国家收集的数据是否存在差异。方法在一个由中国口吃者组成的在线自助社区中,共收集了139份对OASES-A-SC的回复。我们进行了描述性分析,以了解口吃如何影响中国口吃者的生活体验。对性别、最高教育程度和治疗史进行了比较。还对从中国、澳大利亚、荷兰、日本、瑞典和美国收集的数据进行了跨文化比较。结果OASES-A-SC的数据显示出向OASES-A影响量表的严重端倾斜的分布。约93.5%的参与者将口吃对他们生活的总体影响评为“中度”及以上。一般信息、对口吃的反应和生活资格部分的平均得分属于中度至重度。与其他五个国家的数据相比,中国的数据在影响严重程度方面明显更高。结论与西方或发达国家相比,中国口吃者有更多与口吃相关的不良经历。在中国,人们对口吃的负面态度越高,对残疾人的社会污名化,以及专业支持的减少,都被认为与这种更不利的经历有关。文化差异,如中国文化中更大的权力距离和更高的集体主义,被认为与口吃在中国的不良影响水平升高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal of Fluency Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do dyslexia and stuttering share a processing eficit?", [Journal of Fluency Disorders, 67 (2021) 105827]. Editorial Board A theory building critical realist evaluation of an integrated cognitive-behavioural fluency enhancing stuttering treatment for school-age children. Part 1: Development of a preliminary program theory from expert speech-language pathologist data. Public attitudes toward stuttering and cluttering in Chinese and Japanese speech-language pathology students Mitigating stuttering self-stigma: How do we start and where do we go? Using a Participative Concept Mapping Approach to develop a local framework of principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1