Is it safe to withdraw low-dose glucocorticoids in SLE patients in remission?

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Autoimmunity reviews Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103446
Alexis Mathian , Laurent Arnaud , Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza
{"title":"Is it safe to withdraw low-dose glucocorticoids in SLE patients in remission?","authors":"Alexis Mathian ,&nbsp;Laurent Arnaud ,&nbsp;Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Glucocorticoids<span><span> (GCs) remain a cornerstone of the treatment of </span>Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Numerous studies have emphasized the risk of damage accrual in SLE patient treated with GC, but currently, it is not possible to dissociate favorable and undesirable effects of GCs because their underlying mechanisms are entangled at the molecular level. Here, we review whether available data suggest that it is possible, feasible and desirable to taper and discontinue GC treatment in SLE. The main potential concern with GC withdrawal is the risk of SLE flare, which is strongly associated with increased organ damage, mortality, healthcare costs, decreased </span></span>quality of life<span> and work productivity. While most studies have assumed the cut off point for low doses<span><span> (e.g. 7.5/mg/d) as the limit for safety, it is still controversial whether lower doses may influence damage accrual long-term. Also, a recent randomized trial has shown that a daily dose of 5 mg of prednisone<span> in SLE patients in short-term remission can prevent up to 50–75% of flares, with an acceptable safety profile. However, this treatment is not mandatory for all patients. Yet, several observational studies highlight that discontinuation of GC is associated with lower damage accrual. Currently, we do not have a reliable method to identify patients who may require long-term low-dose GC. Therefore, further research is needed to identify a subgroup at high risk of relapse who would benefit from continuing prednisone. In the meantime, when considering the discontinuation of very low-dose prednisone, the decision must be individualized, as </span></span>HCQ<span> and conventional immunosuppressive agents are not without risk of side effects.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997223001805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain a cornerstone of the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Numerous studies have emphasized the risk of damage accrual in SLE patient treated with GC, but currently, it is not possible to dissociate favorable and undesirable effects of GCs because their underlying mechanisms are entangled at the molecular level. Here, we review whether available data suggest that it is possible, feasible and desirable to taper and discontinue GC treatment in SLE. The main potential concern with GC withdrawal is the risk of SLE flare, which is strongly associated with increased organ damage, mortality, healthcare costs, decreased quality of life and work productivity. While most studies have assumed the cut off point for low doses (e.g. 7.5/mg/d) as the limit for safety, it is still controversial whether lower doses may influence damage accrual long-term. Also, a recent randomized trial has shown that a daily dose of 5 mg of prednisone in SLE patients in short-term remission can prevent up to 50–75% of flares, with an acceptable safety profile. However, this treatment is not mandatory for all patients. Yet, several observational studies highlight that discontinuation of GC is associated with lower damage accrual. Currently, we do not have a reliable method to identify patients who may require long-term low-dose GC. Therefore, further research is needed to identify a subgroup at high risk of relapse who would benefit from continuing prednisone. In the meantime, when considering the discontinuation of very low-dose prednisone, the decision must be individualized, as HCQ and conventional immunosuppressive agents are not without risk of side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处于缓解期的系统性红斑狼疮患者停用小剂量糖皮质激素安全吗?
糖皮质激素(GCs)仍然是治疗系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的基石。许多研究都强调了接受糖皮质激素治疗的系统性红斑狼疮患者损伤累积的风险,但目前还无法将糖皮质激素的有利和不利影响区分开来,因为它们的内在机制在分子水平上相互纠缠。在此,我们回顾了现有的数据是否表明,在系统性红斑狼疮患者中减量和停用 GCs 治疗是可能的、可行的和可取的。停用 GC 的主要潜在问题是系统性红斑狼疮复发的风险,这与器官损伤、死亡率、医疗费用、生活质量下降和工作效率提高密切相关。虽然大多数研究都将低剂量(如 7.5/mg/d)作为安全性的临界点,但低剂量是否会长期影响损害的累积仍存在争议。另外,最近的一项随机试验显示,对短期缓解的系统性红斑狼疮患者每天使用 5 毫克的泼尼松可以预防高达 50-75% 的复发,而且安全性也可以接受。然而,并非所有患者都必须接受这种治疗。然而,一些观察性研究强调,停用 GC 与较低的损伤累积有关。目前,我们还没有可靠的方法来确定哪些患者可能需要长期低剂量 GC。因此,我们需要进一步研究,以确定哪些高复发风险亚群可从继续使用泼尼松中获益。同时,在考虑停用极低剂量泼尼松时,必须因人而异,因为 HCQ 和常规免疫抑制剂并非没有副作用风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Neuroimmune communication of the cholinergic system in gut inflammation and autoimmunity Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) from 2011 to 2024: A comprehensive bibliometric review. The mosaic of systemic lupus erythematosus: From autoimmunity to autoinflammation and immunodeficiency and back Sjogren's syndrome: Everything you always wanted to know about genetic and epigenetic factors Global burden due to modifiable risk factors for autoimmune diseases, 1990–2021: Temporal trends and socio-demographic inequalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1