Pub Date : 2024-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103696
Heng Bai, Jie Tian
Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are frequently studied together due to their close relationship. Despite significant research in this area, bibliometric studies addressing global research trends, key hotspots, and developmental trajectories are still lacking.
Methods: This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine 2233 publications on APS and SLE from 1989 to 2024, sourced from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualization tools, such as the bibliometrix R package, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, were utilized.
Results: The analysis includes contributions from 9322 researchers across 2534 institutions in 91 countries, with publications spread across 585 journals. Research activity has increased substantially since 2015, reflecting the growing academic interest in the field. The United States led in publication volume, while Tel Aviv University produced the highest number of publications. Lupus had the highest number of both publications and citations. Yehuda Shoenfeld is the most prolific author, while Ronald A. Asherson is the most co-cited author. Keyword analysis revealed five major themes in APS and SLE research, covering thrombosis, cardiovascular diseases, immune response, pregnancy complications, and other connective tissue diseases. Thematic map emphasized the need for future research to focus on the immune mechanisms of antiphospholipid antibodies, thrombosis management, management of pregnancy complications, and interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Conclusion: This study analyzes the literature on APS and SLE, revealing trends in the research of their immune mechanisms, thrombosis management, pregnancy complications, and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and providing strong guidance for future research directions.
{"title":"Global research landscape on antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: Trends, collaborations, and future directions.","authors":"Heng Bai, Jie Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are frequently studied together due to their close relationship. Despite significant research in this area, bibliometric studies addressing global research trends, key hotspots, and developmental trajectories are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine 2233 publications on APS and SLE from 1989 to 2024, sourced from the Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualization tools, such as the bibliometrix R package, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis includes contributions from 9322 researchers across 2534 institutions in 91 countries, with publications spread across 585 journals. Research activity has increased substantially since 2015, reflecting the growing academic interest in the field. The United States led in publication volume, while Tel Aviv University produced the highest number of publications. Lupus had the highest number of both publications and citations. Yehuda Shoenfeld is the most prolific author, while Ronald A. Asherson is the most co-cited author. Keyword analysis revealed five major themes in APS and SLE research, covering thrombosis, cardiovascular diseases, immune response, pregnancy complications, and other connective tissue diseases. Thematic map emphasized the need for future research to focus on the immune mechanisms of antiphospholipid antibodies, thrombosis management, management of pregnancy complications, and interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study analyzes the literature on APS and SLE, revealing trends in the research of their immune mechanisms, thrombosis management, pregnancy complications, and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and providing strong guidance for future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103696"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142674767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for treating autoimmune diseases, particularly in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric patients with SLE remains unexplored. Herein, we present a compelling investigation of two pediatric patients with refractory SLE who underwent infusion of CD19-targeted CAR T-cell infusion. Patients 1 and 2 tolerated the CAR T-cell therapy well, which demonstrated remarkable efficacy after five and four months, respectively.
{"title":"Treatment of two pediatric patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus using CD19-targeted CAR T cells.","authors":"Xue He, Bin Hu, Yingzi Zhang, Fei Liu, Qiuyu Li, Chen Zheng, Junjie Shen, Zhi Yang, Jingjing Wang, Daqing Ma, Cheng Qian, Meiping Lu, Jianhua Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for treating autoimmune diseases, particularly in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric patients with SLE remains unexplored. Herein, we present a compelling investigation of two pediatric patients with refractory SLE who underwent infusion of CD19-targeted CAR T-cell infusion. Patients 1 and 2 tolerated the CAR T-cell therapy well, which demonstrated remarkable efficacy after five and four months, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103692"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142674776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) identifies patients with insufficient response to biological or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying drugs (b/ts DMARDs), heralding a more severe phenotype. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) provides information on MSK inflammatory load and damage, being widely used in RA and inflammatory arthritides, yet the US patterns of D2TRA and correlation with clinical parameters have not been unanimously described so far. Here we investigated MSK-US patterns and their prognostic value in D2TRA through a systematic literature review (SLR) across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus and Ovid (Embase) electronic databases. We initially retrieved 2365 papers; following the application of appropriate strings the number was lowered to 22. Among those, three papers fulfilled the required criteria. A total of 159 patients with D2TRA were analyzed. In comparison to non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients exhibited more extensive and severe synovitis, which correlated with higher disease activity scores and poorer treatment outcomes. Most US-affected joints belonged to hand and wrist. Grey-scale (GS) rather than power-Doppler (PD) synovitis score was consistently increased across D2TRA joints. Inclusion of US in recognition of D2TRA decreased the proportion of classifiable patients, identifying the true inflammatory D2T cases. The results of this SLR suggest that standardization of US phenotyping may aid the identification and stratification of D2TRA patients in clinical practice.
{"title":"The role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in difficult-to-treat RA: Insights from a systematic literature review.","authors":"Elisa Bellis, Federica Agugliaro, Claudia Garulli, Silvia Perrone, Gaetano Liperoti, Mariele Gatto, Annamaria Iagnocco","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103694","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) identifies patients with insufficient response to biological or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying drugs (b/ts DMARDs), heralding a more severe phenotype. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) provides information on MSK inflammatory load and damage, being widely used in RA and inflammatory arthritides, yet the US patterns of D2TRA and correlation with clinical parameters have not been unanimously described so far. Here we investigated MSK-US patterns and their prognostic value in D2TRA through a systematic literature review (SLR) across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus and Ovid (Embase) electronic databases. We initially retrieved 2365 papers; following the application of appropriate strings the number was lowered to 22. Among those, three papers fulfilled the required criteria. A total of 159 patients with D2TRA were analyzed. In comparison to non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients exhibited more extensive and severe synovitis, which correlated with higher disease activity scores and poorer treatment outcomes. Most US-affected joints belonged to hand and wrist. Grey-scale (GS) rather than power-Doppler (PD) synovitis score was consistently increased across D2TRA joints. Inclusion of US in recognition of D2TRA decreased the proportion of classifiable patients, identifying the true inflammatory D2T cases. The results of this SLR suggest that standardization of US phenotyping may aid the identification and stratification of D2TRA patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103694"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103691
Heng Bai, Jie Tian
Background: This study investigates global research on autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) to address gaps in disciplinary trends, research directions, and emerging topics, aiming to enhance understanding of ASIA's role in immune dysregulation and multi-system diseases.
Methods: This study uses bibliometric methods, based on data from the Web of Science (WOS) database, to analyze 203 ASIA-related publications from 2011 to 2024. Analytical tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix R package, were employed to identify key research directions and frontier topics.
Results: Contributions from 40 countries, 318 institutions, and 824 researchers were analyzed, providing a global perspective on ASIA research. Israel contributed the highest publication volume, with Tel Aviv University being the most prolific contributor. Analysis showed that Immunologic Research published the most ASIA-related articles, whereas the Journal of Autoimmunity had the highest citation count. Keyword analysis identified six main research themes, including vaccine and adjuvant components, silicone implant-associated diseases, and connections between specific vaccines and autoimmune conditions. Thematic mapping highlighted key yet under-explored areas, such as immune responses to COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, and responses to specific adjuvants, offering insights into ASIA's complexity.
Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of ASIA's core themes and trends, highlighting key areas for future research, especially on the immune effects of vaccine adjuvants and implants. Although relying on a single data source, WOS's extensive coverage and citation tracking support the validity of these findings, laying a foundation for future ASIA research and clinical applications.
背景:本研究调查了佐剂诱导的自身免疫/炎症综合征(ASIA)的全球研究情况,探讨了学科趋势、研究方向和新兴课题方面的差距,旨在加深对ASIA在免疫失调和多系统疾病中作用的理解:本研究采用文献计量学方法,以科学网(WOS)数据库的数据为基础,分析了2011年至2024年期间与ASIA相关的203篇论文。分析工具包括 VOSviewer、CiteSpace 和 bibliometrix R 软件包,用于确定关键研究方向和前沿课题:分析了来自 40 个国家、318 个机构和 824 名研究人员的投稿,为亚洲研究提供了一个全球视角。以色列的论文发表量最高,其中特拉维夫大学的论文发表量最高。分析表明,《免疫学研究》发表了最多与 ASIA 相关的文章,而《自身免疫学杂志》的引用次数最高。关键词分析确定了六个主要研究主题,包括疫苗和佐剂成分、硅胶植入相关疾病以及特定疫苗和自身免疫疾病之间的联系。主题图谱突出了一些关键但尚未得到充分探索的领域,如对 COVID-19 和 HPV 疫苗的免疫反应,以及对特定佐剂的反应,从而揭示了 ASIA 的复杂性:本研究全面分析了 ASIA 的核心主题和趋势,强调了未来研究的关键领域,尤其是疫苗佐剂和植入物的免疫效应。虽然仅依赖于单一数据源,但 WOS 的广泛覆盖面和引文跟踪支持了这些发现的有效性,为未来的 ASIA 研究和临床应用奠定了基础。
{"title":"Advancing the understanding of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA): Global research trends, key themes, and emerging frontiers.","authors":"Heng Bai, Jie Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates global research on autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) to address gaps in disciplinary trends, research directions, and emerging topics, aiming to enhance understanding of ASIA's role in immune dysregulation and multi-system diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses bibliometric methods, based on data from the Web of Science (WOS) database, to analyze 203 ASIA-related publications from 2011 to 2024. Analytical tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix R package, were employed to identify key research directions and frontier topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contributions from 40 countries, 318 institutions, and 824 researchers were analyzed, providing a global perspective on ASIA research. Israel contributed the highest publication volume, with Tel Aviv University being the most prolific contributor. Analysis showed that Immunologic Research published the most ASIA-related articles, whereas the Journal of Autoimmunity had the highest citation count. Keyword analysis identified six main research themes, including vaccine and adjuvant components, silicone implant-associated diseases, and connections between specific vaccines and autoimmune conditions. Thematic mapping highlighted key yet under-explored areas, such as immune responses to COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, and responses to specific adjuvants, offering insights into ASIA's complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of ASIA's core themes and trends, highlighting key areas for future research, especially on the immune effects of vaccine adjuvants and implants. Although relying on a single data source, WOS's extensive coverage and citation tracking support the validity of these findings, laying a foundation for future ASIA research and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103691"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142638314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103688
Heng Bai , Jie Tian
This study focuses on the search strategies used in bibliometric analyses within the field of autoimmune ear diseases, critically examining ways to improve search accuracy and relevance. Using the study by Liu et al. as an example, we found that the extensive search terms employed resulted in the inclusion of numerous irrelevant studies, weakening the specificity of the research findings. To address this issue, we propose a more precise search strategy using a combination of specific terms and wildcard symbols to ensure the search scope focuses on literature related to autoimmune ear diseases. Additionally, we recommend limiting search terms to titles, abstracts, and author keywords to reduce interference from unrelated literature. Moreover, we identify potential errors in keyword analysis caused by unmerged synonyms and suggest optimizing the accuracy of keyword co-occurrence analysis through synonym merging. This study aims to provide a more reliable methodological guide for future bibliometric analyses, thereby improving the quality and scientific rigor of research on autoimmune ear diseases.
本研究侧重于自身免疫性耳病领域文献计量学分析中使用的检索策略,批判性地探讨了提高检索准确性和相关性的方法。以 Liu 等人的研究为例,我们发现所使用的大量搜索条件导致纳入了大量不相关的研究,削弱了研究结果的特异性。为解决这一问题,我们建议采用更精确的搜索策略,结合使用特定术语和通配符号,以确保搜索范围集中于与自身免疫性耳病相关的文献。此外,我们建议将检索词限制在标题、摘要和作者关键词上,以减少无关文献的干扰。此外,我们还发现了同义词未合并可能导致的关键词分析错误,并建议通过同义词合并优化关键词共现分析的准确性。本研究旨在为今后的文献计量学分析提供更可靠的方法指导,从而提高自身免疫性耳病研究的质量和科学严谨性。
{"title":"Refining search and keyword strategies in autoimmune ear disease bibliometric studies","authors":"Heng Bai , Jie Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103688","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on the search strategies used in bibliometric analyses within the field of autoimmune ear diseases, critically examining ways to improve search accuracy and relevance. Using the study by Liu et al. as an example, we found that the extensive search terms employed resulted in the inclusion of numerous irrelevant studies, weakening the specificity of the research findings. To address this issue, we propose a more precise search strategy using a combination of specific terms and wildcard symbols to ensure the search scope focuses on literature related to autoimmune ear diseases. Additionally, we recommend limiting search terms to titles, abstracts, and author keywords to reduce interference from unrelated literature. Moreover, we identify potential errors in keyword analysis caused by unmerged synonyms and suggest optimizing the accuracy of keyword co-occurrence analysis through synonym merging. This study aims to provide a more reliable methodological guide for future bibliometric analyses, thereby improving the quality and scientific rigor of research on autoimmune ear diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 12","pages":"Article 103688"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-10DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103687
Tamim Alsuliman , Zora Marjanovic , Doron Rimar , Karin Tarte , Tadej Avcin , Melanie Hagen , Georg Schett , Dominique Farge
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a rare, heterogeneous, potentially life-threatening autoimmune disease. Presence of kidney or other major organ (brain, heart or lung) involvement are predictors of poor outcome and in a subset of patients resistant to 1st or 2nd line conventional treatment. The 10-year mortality remains around 10–15 %.
Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) are molecules that allow to redirect the engineered immune cells towards specific target antigens and to simultaneously boost their activation. Following breakthrough results observed in the treatment of hematological malignancies, conventional CAR T-cell therapy has recently been applied to refractory SLE patients. Compared to the use of monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD19 CAR T-cells allow to achieve deeper depletion of autoreactive B cells, notably at site of inflamed tissues and lymphoid organs (i.e. lymph node), to suppress interferon signature and to restore the immune tolerance with the reemergence of naïve B-cells with a new repertoire.
All clinical data reported in SLE patients so far showed that autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment allowed impressive short- and longer-term resolution of lupus nephritis and other severe disease-related manifestations, without major toxicities and only mild cytokine-release syndrome. These clinical effects persisted after B-cell reconstitution and were associated with normalization of double-stranded DNA antibodies and complement levels in drug-free patients until three years after the procedure. Overall, these pioneering experiences show unique clinical and immunological response to CAR T-cell therapy in SLE, and the need for extended follow-up to determine its long-term efficacy.
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种罕见的、异质性的、可能危及生命的自身免疫性疾病。肾脏或其他主要器官(脑、心脏或肺)受累是预示不良预后的因素,而且部分患者对一线或二线常规治疗产生耐药性。10 年死亡率仍在 10-15% 左右。嵌合抗原受体(CAR)是一种分子,可将工程免疫细胞重新定向到特定的靶抗原,并同时促进其活化。在治疗血液恶性肿瘤方面取得突破性成果后,传统的 CAR T 细胞疗法最近也被应用于难治性系统性红斑狼疮患者。与使用单克隆抗体相比,抗 CD19 CAR T 细胞能更深入地清除自反应性 B 细胞,尤其是在炎症组织和淋巴器官(如淋巴结)部位,抑制干扰素特征,并通过具有新细胞谱的新生 B 细胞的重新出现来恢复免疫耐受。迄今为止,在系统性红斑狼疮患者中报道的所有临床数据都表明,自体抗 CD19 CAR T 细胞治疗可在短期和长期内缓解狼疮肾炎和其他严重疾病相关表现,且无严重毒性反应,只有轻微的细胞因子释放综合征。这些临床效果在 B 细胞重建后依然存在,并与无药患者的双链 DNA 抗体和补体水平恢复正常有关,直至治疗后三年。总之,这些开创性的经验表明,CAR T 细胞疗法在系统性红斑狼疮中具有独特的临床和免疫学反应,因此需要延长随访时间以确定其长期疗效。
{"title":"Harnessing the potential of CAR-T cell in lupus treatment: From theory to practice","authors":"Tamim Alsuliman , Zora Marjanovic , Doron Rimar , Karin Tarte , Tadej Avcin , Melanie Hagen , Georg Schett , Dominique Farge","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103687","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a rare, heterogeneous, potentially life-threatening autoimmune disease. Presence of kidney or other major organ (brain, heart or lung) involvement are predictors of poor outcome and in a subset of patients resistant to 1st or 2nd line conventional treatment. The 10-year mortality remains around 10–15 %.</div><div>Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) are molecules that allow to redirect the engineered immune cells towards specific target antigens and to simultaneously boost their activation. Following breakthrough results observed in the treatment of hematological malignancies, conventional CAR T-cell therapy has recently been applied to refractory SLE patients. Compared to the use of monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD19 CAR T-cells allow to achieve deeper depletion of autoreactive B cells, notably at site of inflamed tissues and lymphoid organs (i.e. lymph node), to suppress interferon signature and to restore the immune tolerance with the reemergence of naïve B-cells with a new repertoire.</div><div>All clinical data reported in SLE patients so far showed that autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment allowed impressive short- and longer-term resolution of lupus nephritis and other severe disease-related manifestations, without major toxicities and only mild cytokine-release syndrome. These clinical effects persisted after B-cell reconstitution and were associated with normalization of double-stranded DNA antibodies and complement levels in drug-free patients until three years after the procedure. Overall, these pioneering experiences show unique clinical and immunological response to CAR T-cell therapy in SLE, and the need for extended follow-up to determine its long-term efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 12","pages":"Article 103687"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Messenger RNA (mRNA) -based compounds have been lately developed as one of the most promising treatment alternatives in a wide range of pathologies, especially cancers and infectious diseases.
Aim
To review the current research landscape on mRNA-based compounds, with a focus on the inclusion criteria used for participants with autoimmune diseases and/or under immunosuppressive treatments.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive search based on PICO framework specifically formulated, throughout the most important clinical trial registries: WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), as well as in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna official websites.
Data extraction followed the CONSORT checklist, focusing on identifying the specific exclusion criteria for individuals with autoimmune diseases and those undergoing various immunosuppressive treatments, including daily dosages, treatment length, and required cessation periods before enrollment.
We performed descriptive and comparative analyses using statistical tests where applicable.
This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024544811).
Results
Out of 2818 study protocols identified, 608 met the eligibility criteria, the vast majority (96.9 %) focusing on non-replicating RNA.
Most targeted were infectious diseases (66.6 %), primarily COVID-19 (51.3 %), followed by cancers (29.1 %), and other conditions (4.3 %).
Having an autoimmune disease was used as an exclusion criterion in 60.8 % of trials; higher exclusion rates were observed in studies designed for cancers when compared to those assessing infections or other pathologies (79.1 % vs. 55.3 % vs. 23.1 %, p < 0.001), as well as in those using cell-based when compared to non-cell delivery systems (79.2 % vs. 57.2 %, p < 0.001).
Further, participants under immunosuppressive treatments were excluded from 77.5 % of the trials, primarily due to corticosteroid use. There is considerable variability in exclusion criteria related to immunosuppressive treatment length and cessation time prior enrollment, as well as in the daily corticosteroid dosage.
Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to document the ongoing research designed for mRNA-based compounds. This work highlights the underrepresentation of patients with autoimmune diseases and those on immunosuppressive treatments in clinical trials assessing mRNA-based compounds.
{"title":"Autoimmunity, a relevant exclusion criterion in the development of mRNA-based compounds: A systematic review of clinical trials registries","authors":"Larisa Pinte , Alina Dima , Anamaria Draghici , Maria Caraghiulea , Ioana Andreea Zamfir-Gradinaru , Cristian Baicus","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103670","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103670","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Messenger RNA (mRNA) -based compounds have been lately developed as one of the most promising treatment alternatives in a wide range of pathologies, especially cancers and infectious diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To review the current research landscape on mRNA-based compounds, with a focus on the inclusion criteria used for participants with autoimmune diseases and/or under immunosuppressive treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comprehensive search based on PICO framework specifically formulated, throughout the most important clinical trial registries: WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) portal, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), as well as in the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna official websites.</div><div>Data extraction followed the CONSORT checklist, focusing on identifying the specific exclusion criteria for individuals with autoimmune diseases and those undergoing various immunosuppressive treatments, including daily dosages, treatment length, and required cessation periods before enrollment.</div><div>We performed descriptive and comparative analyses using statistical tests where applicable.</div><div>This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024544811).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 2818 study protocols identified, 608 met the eligibility criteria, the vast majority (96.9 %) focusing on non-replicating RNA.</div><div>Most targeted were infectious diseases (66.6 %), primarily COVID-19 (51.3 %), followed by cancers (29.1 %), and other conditions (4.3 %).</div><div>Having an autoimmune disease was used as an exclusion criterion in 60.8 % of trials; higher exclusion rates were observed in studies designed for cancers when compared to those assessing infections or other pathologies (79.1 % vs. 55.3 % vs. 23.1 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), as well as in those using cell-based when compared to non-cell delivery systems (79.2 % vs. 57.2 %, p < 0.001).</div><div>Further, participants under immunosuppressive treatments were excluded from 77.5 % of the trials, primarily due to corticosteroid use. There is considerable variability in exclusion criteria related to immunosuppressive treatment length and cessation time prior enrollment, as well as in the daily corticosteroid dosage.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to document the ongoing research designed for mRNA-based compounds. This work highlights the underrepresentation of patients with autoimmune diseases and those on immunosuppressive treatments in clinical trials assessing mRNA-based compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 12","pages":"Article 103670"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103679
Yu-Chen Liu , Yi-Pin Yang , Yan-Xun Han , Bing-Yu Liang , Zi-Hui Xie , Yu-Chen Zhang , Xi-Xi Chen , Shu-Jia Sang , Fen-Fen Li , Ke Han , Zi-Yue Fu , Si-Yue Yin , Lei Zhang , Shan-Wen Chen , Fan Cao , Bu-Sheng Tong , Hai-Feng Pan , Ye-Hai Liu
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, Autoimmune diseases (ADs) and hearing loss are both significant public health burdens worldwide. An increasing number of studies are focusing on the potential link between these two diseases and exploring how hearing loss can be prevented and treated in the context of autoimmune diseases. In response to this focus, it is very necessary to conduct bibliometric analysis and molecular mechanism exploration to provide guidance for the exploration of basic mechanisms and clinical management.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Studies focusing on hearing loss and autoimmune disease were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2000 to 2024. Bibliometric and visual analysis of the collected publications was conducted using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. The investigation of molecular pathways associated with diseases was carried out in the GeneCards and STRING databases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 696 papers met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were chosen for further research. The number of papers on hearing loss and autoimmune diseases is increasing every year. These papers were mainly from 65 countries, led by the United States, China and Italy. These investigations included 3505 authors in total, with Greco A contributing the most publications. Harvard Medical School and Sapienza University Rome were the two institutions with the highest number of publications. Otology & Neurotology was the journal with the highest number of publications. The most common keywords include “ sensorineural hearing loss”, “endolymphatic hydrops”, “management” and “autoimmune”, which represent current and prospective future research trends and target topics in the field. Among them, the highest proportion of hearing loss in autoimmune ear diseases is sensorineural hearing loss, and the highest proportion of primary autoimmune ear diseases is Autoimmune inner ear disease. In addition, A total of 295 potential targets common to both diseases were also identified. Their pathogenesis involves cancer pathways, infectious disease pathways, cell senescence, epithelial and myocyte proliferation, hypoxia response, and inflammatory response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This bibliometric analysis reveals global research trends on hearing loss in the context of autoimmune diseases. Based on this, combined with preliminary bioinformatics analysis, a potential yet close link between the autoimmune diseases and hearing loss has been demonstrated. The current study highlights the need to fully consider the common genetic and pathophysiological mechanisms of these two types of diseases to promote interdisciplinary research and the development of personalized treatments for this clinical focus, with particular attention to the elderly population with comorbidity diseases. A deeper understanding of disease mechanisms has also led to advances in the clinical management of autoimmune
{"title":"Global trend analysis, mechanistic insights and future directions of autoimmune ear diseases: Based on comprehensive findings over the past 20 years","authors":"Yu-Chen Liu , Yi-Pin Yang , Yan-Xun Han , Bing-Yu Liang , Zi-Hui Xie , Yu-Chen Zhang , Xi-Xi Chen , Shu-Jia Sang , Fen-Fen Li , Ke Han , Zi-Yue Fu , Si-Yue Yin , Lei Zhang , Shan-Wen Chen , Fan Cao , Bu-Sheng Tong , Hai-Feng Pan , Ye-Hai Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103679","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103679","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, Autoimmune diseases (ADs) and hearing loss are both significant public health burdens worldwide. An increasing number of studies are focusing on the potential link between these two diseases and exploring how hearing loss can be prevented and treated in the context of autoimmune diseases. In response to this focus, it is very necessary to conduct bibliometric analysis and molecular mechanism exploration to provide guidance for the exploration of basic mechanisms and clinical management.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Studies focusing on hearing loss and autoimmune disease were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2000 to 2024. Bibliometric and visual analysis of the collected publications was conducted using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. The investigation of molecular pathways associated with diseases was carried out in the GeneCards and STRING databases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 696 papers met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were chosen for further research. The number of papers on hearing loss and autoimmune diseases is increasing every year. These papers were mainly from 65 countries, led by the United States, China and Italy. These investigations included 3505 authors in total, with Greco A contributing the most publications. Harvard Medical School and Sapienza University Rome were the two institutions with the highest number of publications. Otology & Neurotology was the journal with the highest number of publications. The most common keywords include “ sensorineural hearing loss”, “endolymphatic hydrops”, “management” and “autoimmune”, which represent current and prospective future research trends and target topics in the field. Among them, the highest proportion of hearing loss in autoimmune ear diseases is sensorineural hearing loss, and the highest proportion of primary autoimmune ear diseases is Autoimmune inner ear disease. In addition, A total of 295 potential targets common to both diseases were also identified. Their pathogenesis involves cancer pathways, infectious disease pathways, cell senescence, epithelial and myocyte proliferation, hypoxia response, and inflammatory response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This bibliometric analysis reveals global research trends on hearing loss in the context of autoimmune diseases. Based on this, combined with preliminary bioinformatics analysis, a potential yet close link between the autoimmune diseases and hearing loss has been demonstrated. The current study highlights the need to fully consider the common genetic and pathophysiological mechanisms of these two types of diseases to promote interdisciplinary research and the development of personalized treatments for this clinical focus, with particular attention to the elderly population with comorbidity diseases. A deeper understanding of disease mechanisms has also led to advances in the clinical management of autoimmune ","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 12","pages":"Article 103679"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune systemic disorder manifesting with typical skin rashes and proximal muscle weakness. A specific clinical DM subset is characterized by the presence of the anti–melanoma differentiation–associated protein 5 (MDA5) autoantibodies. These patients are usually burdened by a severe clinical phenotype exhibiting a poor prognosis. Interestingly, a growing body of evidence has shown that (interferon) IFN signature evaluation by the assessment of type I IFN score could be a possible mechanistic biomarker for these more severe patients with DM. Thus, in this work, the difference in type I IFN score between patients with DM and healthy controls (HCs), lacking systematic synthesis of available evidence, was assessed. Moreover, the possible difference in type I IFN score between patients with DM with or without MDA5 autoantibodies was investigated.
A systematic review with a meta-analysis of available literature about values of type I IFN was performed in DM and HCs. A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases to identify all possible relevant studies published up to May 2024 in English language.
Four studies met the inclusion criteria, comparing type I IFN score between patients with DM and HCs, or between patients with or without anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. The type I IFN score was significantly higher in patients affected by DM when compared with HCs (pooled SMD = 2.27; 95 % CI: 0.71, 3.82; p = 0.004, I2 = 96 %, pfor heterogeneity < 0.00001) and in patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies than those without (pooled SMD = 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.06, 1.70; p = 0.03, I2 = 83 %, pfor heterogeneity = 0.01).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, higher values of type I IFN score were retrieved in patients with DM when compared with HCs and in patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies with respect to those without. Thus, the assessment of type I IFN score appears to be a valuable mechanistic biomarker to clinically profile DM patients, and particularly those with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies.
皮肌炎(Dermatomyositis,DM)是一种罕见的自身免疫性系统疾病,表现为典型的皮疹和近端肌肉无力。临床上有一种特殊的皮肌炎亚型,其特征是存在抗黑色素瘤分化相关蛋白 5(MDA5)自身抗体。这些患者通常临床表现严重,预后不良。有趣的是,越来越多的证据表明,通过评估 I 型 IFN 评分来评估(干扰素)IFN 标志可能是这些病情较重的 DM 患者的一种机理生物标志物。因此,在这项工作中,我们在缺乏对现有证据进行系统综合的情况下,评估了 DM 患者与健康对照组(HCs)之间 I 型 IFN 评分的差异。此外,还研究了有或没有MDA5自身抗体的DM患者的I型IFN得分可能存在的差异。对现有文献中有关 DM 和 HC 的 I 型 IFN 值进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们在 MEDLINE、SCOPUS 和 WEB OF SCIENCE 数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定截至 2024 年 5 月发表的所有可能的相关英文研究。有四项研究符合纳入标准,它们比较了 DM 患者和 HC 患者之间或有无抗 MDA5 自身抗体患者之间的 I 型 IFN 评分。与HCs相比,DM患者的I型IFN得分明显更高(汇总SMD = 2.27; 95 % CI: 0.71, 3.82; p = 0.004, I2 = 96 %, pfor heterogeneity 2 = 83 %, pfor heterogeneity = 0.01)。在该系统综述和荟萃分析中,与 HCs 相比,DM 患者的 I 型 IFN 评分值更高,与无抗 MDA5 自身抗体的患者相比,有抗 MDA5 自身抗体的患者的 I 型 IFN 评分值更高。因此,I型IFN评分的评估似乎是临床分析DM患者,尤其是抗MDA5自身抗体患者的一个有价值的机理生物标志物。
{"title":"The evaluation of type I interferon score in dermatomyositis, a systematic review and a meta-analysis","authors":"Chiara Castellini , Claudia Scotti , Luca Navarini , Qiong Fu , Jinjing Qian , Roberto Giacomelli , Lorenzo Cavagna , Piero Ruscitti","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103686","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103686","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune systemic disorder manifesting with typical skin rashes and proximal muscle weakness. A specific clinical DM subset is characterized by the presence of the anti–melanoma differentiation–associated protein 5 (MDA5) autoantibodies. These patients are usually burdened by a severe clinical phenotype exhibiting a poor prognosis. Interestingly, a growing body of evidence has shown that (interferon) IFN signature evaluation by the assessment of type I IFN score could be a possible mechanistic biomarker for these more severe patients with DM. Thus, in this work, the difference in type I IFN score between patients with DM and healthy controls (HCs), lacking systematic synthesis of available evidence, was assessed. Moreover, the possible difference in type I IFN score between patients with DM with or without MDA5 autoantibodies was investigated.</div><div>A systematic review with a meta-analysis of available literature about values of type I IFN was performed in DM and HCs. A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases to identify all possible relevant studies published up to May 2024 in English language.</div><div>Four studies met the inclusion criteria, comparing type I IFN score between patients with DM and HCs, or between patients with or without anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. The type I IFN score was significantly higher in patients affected by DM when compared with HCs (pooled SMD = 2.27; 95 % CI: 0.71, 3.82; <em>p</em> = 0.004, I<sup>2</sup> = 96 %, p<sub>for heterogeneity</sub> < 0.00001) and in patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies than those without (pooled SMD = 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.06, 1.70; <em>p</em> = 0.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 83 %, p<sub>for heterogeneity</sub> = 0.01).</div><div>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, higher values of type I IFN score were retrieved in patients with DM when compared with HCs and in patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies with respect to those without. Thus, the assessment of type I IFN score appears to be a valuable mechanistic biomarker to clinically profile DM patients, and particularly those with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 12","pages":"Article 103686"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}