Common spatial pattern for classification of loving kindness meditation EEG for single and multiple sessions.

Q1 Computer Science Brain Informatics Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1186/s40708-023-00204-9
Nalinda D Liyanagedera, Ali Abdul Hussain, Amardeep Singh, Sunil Lal, Heather Kempton, Hans W Guesgen
{"title":"Common spatial pattern for classification of loving kindness meditation EEG for single and multiple sessions.","authors":"Nalinda D Liyanagedera, Ali Abdul Hussain, Amardeep Singh, Sunil Lal, Heather Kempton, Hans W Guesgen","doi":"10.1186/s40708-023-00204-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While a very few studies have been conducted on classifying loving kindness meditation (LKM) and non-meditation electroencephalography (EEG) data for a single session, there are no such studies conducted for multiple session EEG data. Thus, this study aims at classifying existing raw EEG meditation data on single and multiple sessions to come up with meaningful inferences which will be highly beneficial when developing algorithms that can support meditation practices. In this analysis, data have been collected on Pre-Resting (before-meditation), Post-Resting (after-meditation), LKM-Self and LKM-Others for 32 participants and hence allowing us to conduct six pairwise comparisons for the four mind tasks. Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) is a feature extraction method widely used in motor imaginary brain computer interface (BCI), but not in meditation EEG data. Therefore, using CSP in extracting features from meditation EEG data and classifying meditation/non-meditation instances, particularly for multiple sessions will create a new path in future meditation EEG research. The classification was done using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) where both meditation techniques (LKM-Self and LKM-Others) were compared with Pre-Resting and Post-Resting instances. The results show that for a single session of 32 participants, around 99.5% accuracy was obtained for classifying meditation/Pre-Resting instances. For the 15 participants when using five sessions of EEG data, around 83.6% accuracy was obtained for classifying meditation/Pre-Resting instances. The results demonstrate the ability to classify meditation/Pre-Resting data. Most importantly, this classification is possible for multiple session data as well. In addition to this, when comparing the classification accuracies of the six mind task pairs; LKM-Self, LKM-Others and Post-Resting produced relatively lower accuracies among them than the accuracies obtained for classifying Pre-Resting with the other three. This indicates that Pre-Resting has some features giving a better classification indicating that it is different from the other three mind tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":"10 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-023-00204-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a very few studies have been conducted on classifying loving kindness meditation (LKM) and non-meditation electroencephalography (EEG) data for a single session, there are no such studies conducted for multiple session EEG data. Thus, this study aims at classifying existing raw EEG meditation data on single and multiple sessions to come up with meaningful inferences which will be highly beneficial when developing algorithms that can support meditation practices. In this analysis, data have been collected on Pre-Resting (before-meditation), Post-Resting (after-meditation), LKM-Self and LKM-Others for 32 participants and hence allowing us to conduct six pairwise comparisons for the four mind tasks. Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) is a feature extraction method widely used in motor imaginary brain computer interface (BCI), but not in meditation EEG data. Therefore, using CSP in extracting features from meditation EEG data and classifying meditation/non-meditation instances, particularly for multiple sessions will create a new path in future meditation EEG research. The classification was done using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) where both meditation techniques (LKM-Self and LKM-Others) were compared with Pre-Resting and Post-Resting instances. The results show that for a single session of 32 participants, around 99.5% accuracy was obtained for classifying meditation/Pre-Resting instances. For the 15 participants when using five sessions of EEG data, around 83.6% accuracy was obtained for classifying meditation/Pre-Resting instances. The results demonstrate the ability to classify meditation/Pre-Resting data. Most importantly, this classification is possible for multiple session data as well. In addition to this, when comparing the classification accuracies of the six mind task pairs; LKM-Self, LKM-Others and Post-Resting produced relatively lower accuracies among them than the accuracies obtained for classifying Pre-Resting with the other three. This indicates that Pre-Resting has some features giving a better classification indicating that it is different from the other three mind tasks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仁爱冥想单次与多次脑电分类的共同空间格局。
对单次慈心冥想(LKM)和非冥想脑电图(EEG)数据进行分类的研究很少,而对多次脑电图数据进行分类的研究则很少。因此,本研究旨在对现有的单次和多次原始脑电图冥想数据进行分类,以得出有意义的推论,这将在开发支持冥想练习的算法时非常有益。在这项分析中,我们收集了32名参与者的静息前(冥想前)、静息后(冥想后)、LKM-Self和LKM-Others的数据,从而允许我们对四种思维任务进行六次两两比较。共同空间模式(Common Spatial Patterns, CSP)是一种广泛应用于运动想象脑机接口(BCI)的特征提取方法,但在冥想脑电数据中应用较少。因此,利用CSP对冥想脑电数据进行特征提取,并对冥想/非冥想实例进行分类,特别是对多时段的冥想脑电进行分类,将为未来的冥想脑电研究开辟一条新的路径。使用线性判别分析(LDA)进行分类,将两种冥想技术(LKM-Self和LKM-Others)与静息前和静息后的实例进行比较。结果表明,对于32名参与者的单一会话,对冥想/预休息实例进行分类的准确率约为99.5%。对于15名参与者,当使用5次脑电图数据时,对冥想/休息前实例进行分类的准确率约为83.6%。结果证明了对冥想/预休息数据进行分类的能力。最重要的是,这种分类也可以用于多个会话数据。此外,在比较六种思维任务对的分类准确率时;其中LKM-Self、LKM-Others和Post-Resting的准确率相对低于Pre-Resting与其他三种分类的准确率。这表明,“休息前”有一些特征,可以更好地分类,表明它与其他三种思维任务不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Informatics
Brain Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing
期刊最新文献
Novel machine learning-driven comparative analysis of CSP, STFT, and CSP-STFT fusion for EEG data classification across multiple meditation and non-meditation sessions in BCI pipeline. Rethinking the residual approach: leveraging statistical learning to operationalize cognitive resilience in Alzheimer's disease. CalciumZero: a toolbox for fluorescence calcium imaging on iPSC derived brain organoids. Blockchain-enabled digital twin system for brain stroke prediction. A temporal-spectral graph convolutional neural network model for EEG emotion recognition within and across subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1