Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3
Jeroen H J Paulissen, Ahmed H Seddik, Kyle J Dunton, Christopher J Livings, Marinus van Hulst, Maarten J Postma, Lisa A de Jong, Roel D Freriks
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland.","authors":"Jeroen H J Paulissen, Ahmed H Seddik, Kyle J Dunton, Christopher J Livings, Marinus van Hulst, Maarten J Postma, Lisa A de Jong, Roel D Freriks","doi":"10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer's perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly-for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation-or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data-for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":"689-699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland.

Methods: A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer's perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly-for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation-or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data-for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model.

Results: Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case.

Conclusions: T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰将曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦作为二线治疗 HER2 阳性不可切除和/或转移性乳腺癌的成本效益模型。
研究目的曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦(T-DXd)最近被人用医药产品委员会推荐为治疗不可切除或转移性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌成年患者的药物,这些患者之前曾接受过以抗 HER2 为基础的治疗方案。在我们的研究中,我们评估了在芬兰,T-DXd 与 ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) 在这一适应症方面的成本效益比较:方法:我们从支付方的角度开发了一个三态分区生存分析模型。DESTINY-Breast03(DB-03)试验中的事件发生时间数据被直接推断为无进展生存期和终止治疗时间,或使用另一种方法,即利用 T-DM1 的长期生存期数据和 DB-03 的总生存期数据推断为终生生存期。成本和效果的贴现率为 3%。输入数据来自 Kela 医药产品数据库、赫尔辛基大学医院服务价格表、芬兰药品管理局评估、临床专家和 DB-03。进行了敏感性分析,以确定并展示模型中参数的不确定性:结果:与 T-DM1 相比,T-DXd 获得的总质量调整生命年 (QALY) 和总生命年 (LY) 分别为 1.93 和 2.56。与 T-DM1 相比,T-DXd 的增量成本为 106,800 欧元,因此每获得一个 QALY 的 ICER 为 55,360 欧元,每获得一个 LY 的 ICER 为 41,775 欧元。单向敏感性分析表明,T-DXd 与 T-DM1 对 OS 的危险比是影响最大的参数。概率敏感性分析结果与基本病例相似:根据每 QALY 72,000 欧元和 139,000 欧元的代用 WTP 临界值,T-DXd 具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Assessing the costs and benefits of non-pharmaceutical pandemic measures using the economic values of social contacts. Life-cycle health effects of compulsory schooling. Revisiting health state preferences after 20 years: A new EQ-5D-3L value set for the Netherlands. The effect of age-specific stay-at-home recommendation on healthcare utilization: Evidence from Finland's COVID-19 policy. Bridging success in the labour market: does continuity of general practitioners' care matter for individuals with common mental disorders?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1