Pandemic Footprints of Nursing Professionals: Processing Early Experiences.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING Journal of Holistic Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1177/08980101231198714
Karen D Groller, Pamela Z Adamshick, Lorraine M Hoffman
{"title":"Pandemic Footprints of Nursing Professionals: Processing Early Experiences.","authors":"Karen D Groller, Pamela Z Adamshick, Lorraine M Hoffman","doi":"10.1177/08980101231198714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: This study interpreted journaled experiences of registered nurses (RNs) who were working at the bedside early in the pandemic as they were simultaneously enrolled in a baccalaureate (RN-BSN) completion program. <b>Design:</b> This qualitative interpretive descriptive study used purposive sampling. <b>Methods:</b> Eighteen students participated in the journal assignment. Fifteen students consented to participate in journal analyses. Journals were de-identified and a code book was used to document the entirety of journal reflections to identify meaningful text, and, ultimately, assert thematic codes. Thorne's interpretive description guided analysis. Researchers coded four journals together to obtain trustworthiness and rigor. Each doctorally prepared researcher independently coded a subset of the remaining journals. Emerging significant statements and subthemes were discussed and verified as a team. <b>Results</b>: Researchers identified the essence of pandemic footprints as the following themes emerged: Physical Threats to Safety, Emotional Threats to Safety, Workplace Culture, Healing Energies, and Professional Identity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Compared to previously published research conducted at later points of the pandemic this study is unique. Study data captured nurses' expressed voices through journaling at the brink (March 2020) of what became a global reality. Results illuminated dichotomies that existed then, particularly in response to their own and others' safety and security, leaving profound imprints on their identities extending beyond care environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101231198714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study interpreted journaled experiences of registered nurses (RNs) who were working at the bedside early in the pandemic as they were simultaneously enrolled in a baccalaureate (RN-BSN) completion program. Design: This qualitative interpretive descriptive study used purposive sampling. Methods: Eighteen students participated in the journal assignment. Fifteen students consented to participate in journal analyses. Journals were de-identified and a code book was used to document the entirety of journal reflections to identify meaningful text, and, ultimately, assert thematic codes. Thorne's interpretive description guided analysis. Researchers coded four journals together to obtain trustworthiness and rigor. Each doctorally prepared researcher independently coded a subset of the remaining journals. Emerging significant statements and subthemes were discussed and verified as a team. Results: Researchers identified the essence of pandemic footprints as the following themes emerged: Physical Threats to Safety, Emotional Threats to Safety, Workplace Culture, Healing Energies, and Professional Identity. Conclusions: Compared to previously published research conducted at later points of the pandemic this study is unique. Study data captured nurses' expressed voices through journaling at the brink (March 2020) of what became a global reality. Results illuminated dichotomies that existed then, particularly in response to their own and others' safety and security, leaving profound imprints on their identities extending beyond care environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业人员的流行病足迹:处理早期经验。
目的:本研究对在大流行初期在床边工作的注册护士(RNs)的日记经历进行了解读,这些护士同时还参加了学士学位(RN-BSN)完成课程的学习。设计:这项定性解释性描述性研究采用了目的取样法。方法:18 名学生参加了日记作业:18 名学生参与了日记任务。15 名学生同意参与日志分析。日志被去掉了身份标识,并使用代码本记录日志反思的全部内容,以识别有意义的文本,并最终确定主题代码。索恩的解释性描述为分析提供了指导。研究人员共同对四本日志进行编码,以获得可信度和严谨性。每位准备就绪的博士研究人员对其余日志的子集进行独立编码。出现的重要语句和次主题由团队进行讨论和验证。结果:研究人员确定了大流行病足迹的本质,出现了以下主题:对安全的身体威胁、对安全的情感威胁、工作场所文化、治疗能量和专业身份。结论:与之前发表的在大流行后期进行的研究相比,本研究是独一无二的。研究数据捕捉到了护士们在成为全球现实的边缘(2020 年 3 月)通过日记表达的心声。研究结果揭示了当时存在的二分法,尤其是在应对自身和他人的安全保障方面,这给她们的身份留下了深刻的烙印,超越了护理环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mindfulness Practices for Effectiveness of Stress and Burnout Reduction in Healthcare Staff. Innovative Complementary Cooling Intervention for Women's Multiple Sclerosis Symptoms: A Mixed-Methods Study. Corrigendum to "Forgiveness and Religiosity Among Nurses: A Correlational Descriptive Study". The Effect of Forgiveness and Resilience on Anxiety, Depression and Stress in Nursing Students. Effects of the Vitality Acupunch Exercise Program on Older Adults With Probable Sarcopenia: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1