Stress and Mood Associations With Smartphone Use in University Students: A 12-Week Longitudinal Study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/21677026221116889
Abigail H M Bradley, Andrea L Howard
{"title":"Stress and Mood Associations With Smartphone Use in University Students: A 12-Week Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Abigail H M Bradley,&nbsp;Andrea L Howard","doi":"10.1177/21677026221116889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study used device-logged screen-time records to measure week-to-week within-person associations between stress and smartphone use in undergraduate students (<i>N</i> = 187; mean age = 20.1 years). The study was conducted during fall 2020 and focused on differences across types of app used and whether accumulated screen use each week predicted end-of-week mood states. Participants uploaded weekly screenshots from their iPhone \"Screen Time\" settings display and completed surveys measuring stress, mood, and COVID-19 experiences. Results of multilevel models showed no week-to-week change in smartphone hours of use or device pickups. Higher stress levels were not concurrently associated with heavier smartphone use, either overall or by type of app. Heavier smartphone use in a given week did not predict end-of-week mood states, but students who tended to spend more time on their phones in general reported slightly worse moods-a between-persons effect potentially reflecting deficits in well-being that are present in students' off-line lives as well. Our findings contribute to a growing scholarly consensus that time spent on smartphones tells us little about young people's well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"11 5","pages":"921-941"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491487/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221116889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current study used device-logged screen-time records to measure week-to-week within-person associations between stress and smartphone use in undergraduate students (N = 187; mean age = 20.1 years). The study was conducted during fall 2020 and focused on differences across types of app used and whether accumulated screen use each week predicted end-of-week mood states. Participants uploaded weekly screenshots from their iPhone "Screen Time" settings display and completed surveys measuring stress, mood, and COVID-19 experiences. Results of multilevel models showed no week-to-week change in smartphone hours of use or device pickups. Higher stress levels were not concurrently associated with heavier smartphone use, either overall or by type of app. Heavier smartphone use in a given week did not predict end-of-week mood states, but students who tended to spend more time on their phones in general reported slightly worse moods-a between-persons effect potentially reflecting deficits in well-being that are present in students' off-line lives as well. Our findings contribute to a growing scholarly consensus that time spent on smartphones tells us little about young people's well-being.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生使用智能手机的压力和情绪关联:一项为期12周的纵向研究。
目前的研究使用设备记录的屏幕时间记录来测量本科生每周的压力和智能手机使用之间的人际关系(N = 187;平均年龄20.1岁)。这项研究是在2020年秋季进行的,重点是使用的应用程序类型之间的差异,以及每周累积的屏幕使用情况是否能预测周末的情绪状态。参与者每周从他们的iPhone“屏幕时间”设置显示中上传截图,并完成测量压力、情绪和COVID-19体验的调查。多层模型的结果显示,每周使用智能手机的时间和设备的数量没有变化。更高的压力水平与更频繁地使用智能手机并没有同时关联,无论是从整体上还是从应用程序的类型上来看。在给定的一周内,更频繁地使用智能手机并不能预测一周结束时的情绪状态,但倾向于花更多时间在手机上的学生总体上报告了稍差的情绪——一种人际效应,可能反映了学生离线生活中存在的幸福感缺陷。我们的研究结果有助于越来越多的学术共识,即花在智能手机上的时间几乎不能告诉我们年轻人的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
期刊最新文献
Testing a Reward-Processing Model of Negative Urgency in Women With and Without Binge Eating Bias in the Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder Among Sexual- and Gender-Minority Persons: Results From a Vignette-Based Experiment Opening the Black Box: The Underlying Working Mechanisms in Virtual-Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders A Bayesian Longitudinal Network Analysis of Panic-Disorder Symptoms and Respiratory Biomarkers Additive Benefits of Individual, Relational, and Community Factors on Physical- and Mental-Health Trajectories Among Black Americans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1