Determining the measurement accuracy in assessing the progress of wound healing.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5114/ada.2023.129326
Paweł T Dolibog, Patrycja Dolibog, Daria Chmielewska
{"title":"Determining the measurement accuracy in assessing the progress of wound healing.","authors":"Paweł T Dolibog,&nbsp;Patrycja Dolibog,&nbsp;Daria Chmielewska","doi":"10.5114/ada.2023.129326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wound management is a challenge in terms of the way, duration and cost of treatment both for the patient and health providers. The healing of skin wounds is a highly multi-step coordinated process. Objective monitoring of treatment at every stage is necessary to assess the applied therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To show the possibility of using the AutoCad software (ACS) as a tool with a slight measurement error for accurate measurement of the venous leg ulcers on the lower limbs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>To determine the error of the measurement method Circle Templates For Drafting for four different sizes were used as ulcer models. Seventy-six wounds of various sizes from patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) were photographed and outlined with a marker on a transparent foil. The wounds were measured both using ACS and digital planimetry with C-Geo software (CGS). Data were analysed using Wilcoxon test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean relative error of the surface wound model area measured by the ACS was 0.30 ±0.31% (range: 0.004-1.25) and a median of 0.18%. Areas and perimeters measured with ACS were higher than areas and perimeters measured with CGS, and the difference was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of the wound images obtained in the ACS showed a very high potential of the software in terms of the accuracy of the analysed areas, which significantly increases the possibility of the analysis and reduces the measurement error in relation to planimetry using a digital digitizer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54595,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/ca/PDIA-40-51053.PMC10485759.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.129326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Wound management is a challenge in terms of the way, duration and cost of treatment both for the patient and health providers. The healing of skin wounds is a highly multi-step coordinated process. Objective monitoring of treatment at every stage is necessary to assess the applied therapy.

Aim: To show the possibility of using the AutoCad software (ACS) as a tool with a slight measurement error for accurate measurement of the venous leg ulcers on the lower limbs.

Material and methods: To determine the error of the measurement method Circle Templates For Drafting for four different sizes were used as ulcer models. Seventy-six wounds of various sizes from patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) were photographed and outlined with a marker on a transparent foil. The wounds were measured both using ACS and digital planimetry with C-Geo software (CGS). Data were analysed using Wilcoxon test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: The mean relative error of the surface wound model area measured by the ACS was 0.30 ±0.31% (range: 0.004-1.25) and a median of 0.18%. Areas and perimeters measured with ACS were higher than areas and perimeters measured with CGS, and the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions: The analysis of the wound images obtained in the ACS showed a very high potential of the software in terms of the accuracy of the analysed areas, which significantly increases the possibility of the analysis and reduces the measurement error in relation to planimetry using a digital digitizer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定评估伤口愈合进展的测量准确性。
在治疗方式、持续时间和费用方面,伤口管理对患者和卫生服务提供者都是一个挑战。皮肤伤口的愈合是一个高度协调的多步骤过程。客观监测治疗的每个阶段是必要的,以评估应用治疗。目的:探讨利用AutoCad软件(ACS)作为测量误差较小的工具,对下肢静脉性下肢溃疡进行精确测量的可能性。材料与方法:为了确定测量方法的误差,采用四种不同尺寸的圆形模板作为溃疡模型。对下肢静脉性溃疡(VLUs)患者的76个不同大小的伤口进行了拍照,并用透明箔上的标记画出轮廓。采用ACS和C-Geo软件(CGS)数字平面测量仪对创面进行测量。数据分析采用Wilcoxon检验、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析。结果:ACS测量表面创面模型面积的平均相对误差为0.30±0.31%(范围:0.004 ~ 1.25),中位数为0.18%。ACS测量的面积和周长均高于CGS测量的面积和周长,差异有统计学意义。结论:在ACS中获得的伤口图像的分析显示,该软件在分析区域的准确性方面具有很高的潜力,这大大增加了分析的可能性,并减少了与使用数字数字化仪进行平面测量相关的测量误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii is a bimonthly aimed at allergologists and dermatologists.
期刊最新文献
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of interleukin-35 genes and atopic dermatitis. Cannabidiol modulation of immune cell function: in vitro insights and therapeutic implications for atopic dermatitis. Delayed drug hypersensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drug: a new desensitization scheme. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus proteins and their role in the diagnostics and management of house dust mite allergy: exploring allergenic components. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a new therapeutic approach for an old disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1