Grief participation rights and the social support hierarchy: Exploring the communicative role of the bereaved in a social support interaction.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2023.2235582
Kathrine Lund Hansen, Mai-Britt Guldin, Christina Fogtmann Fosgerau
{"title":"Grief participation rights and the social support hierarchy: Exploring the communicative role of the bereaved in a social support interaction.","authors":"Kathrine Lund Hansen, Mai-Britt Guldin, Christina Fogtmann Fosgerau","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2023.2235582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores how bereaved individuals co-construct social support and social norms in the social interaction of 14 bereavement group meetings in Denmark. To study this, we used a discourse analytical approach focusing on how the participants position their social supporters. The results show that the participants designate, uphold, and presuppose two hierarchical positions to bereaved and non-bereaved supporters with different abilities to understand them. Based on this finding, the concepts of \"grief participation rights\" and \"social support hierarchy\" are proposed to supplement existing notions of \"rights to grieve\" and \"grief hierarchy.\" These concepts suggest that non-bereaved supporters are not accorded the same participatory rights in social support conversations as bereaved individuals who have suffered a similar loss as the speaker. The concepts are discussed in relation to effective social support and in the context of research on social disconnection in grief.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2235582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how bereaved individuals co-construct social support and social norms in the social interaction of 14 bereavement group meetings in Denmark. To study this, we used a discourse analytical approach focusing on how the participants position their social supporters. The results show that the participants designate, uphold, and presuppose two hierarchical positions to bereaved and non-bereaved supporters with different abilities to understand them. Based on this finding, the concepts of "grief participation rights" and "social support hierarchy" are proposed to supplement existing notions of "rights to grieve" and "grief hierarchy." These concepts suggest that non-bereaved supporters are not accorded the same participatory rights in social support conversations as bereaved individuals who have suffered a similar loss as the speaker. The concepts are discussed in relation to effective social support and in the context of research on social disconnection in grief.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悲伤参与权与社会支持等级:探索丧亲者在社会支持互动中的沟通角色。
本文探讨了在丹麦的 14 个丧亲小组会议的社会互动中,丧亲者是如何共同构建社会支持和社会规范的。为了对此进行研究,我们采用了一种话语分析方法,重点研究参与者如何定位他们的社会支持者。研究结果表明,参与者对丧亲支持者和非丧亲支持者指定、维护和预设了两种等级立场,而对他们的理解能力各不相同。基于这一发现,我们提出了 "悲伤参与权 "和 "社会支持等级 "的概念,以补充现有的 "悲伤权 "和 "悲伤等级 "的概念。这些概念表明,在社会支持对话中,非丧亲支持者并不享有与发言人同样的参与权。我们将结合有效的社会支持以及有关悲伤中社会脱节的研究来讨论这些概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Complication of Grief and PTSD among bereaved siblings in Israel. Is COVID-19 loss more associated with prolonged grief disorder than other losses? Beyond pain and sorrow: Dysphemistic use in wartime funeral cards. Unveiling collective grief: A qualitative study of X posts reflecting on the Kahramanmaraş earthquake anniversary in Türkiye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1