Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Repeat Intensive Care Unit Consults

Matthew T. Freedman MD , Kathryn H. Libby MD , Kristin B. Miller MD, MS , Markos G. Kashiouris MD, MPH
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Repeat Intensive Care Unit Consults","authors":"Matthew T. Freedman MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn H. Libby MD ,&nbsp;Kristin B. Miller MD, MS ,&nbsp;Markos G. Kashiouris MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To better understand the mortality and notable characteristics of patients initially denied intensive care unit (ICU) admission that are later admitted on reconsultation.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We collected data regarding all adult inpatients (n=3725) who received one or more ICU consults at an academic tertiary care hospital medical center between January 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021. We compared patients who were initially denied ICU admission and later admitted on reconsultation (C2A1, n=144) with those who were admitted after the first consultation (C1A1, n=2286) and those denied at first consult and never later admitted (C1A0, n=1295).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten percent of patients initially rejected by the ICU were later admitted on reconsultation. There was no significant difference in the adjusted hospital death odds ratios between C1A1 and C2A1 (0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.01; <em>P</em>=.11). Assessing subgroups of the C2A1 population, we found that 8.2% (n=100) of full code patients were later admitted to the ICU on reconsultation vs 23.2% (n=40) of do not attempt resuscitation patients (<em>P</em>&lt;.001); 7.6% (n=77) of patients initially consulted from the emergency department were later admitted to the ICU on reconsultation vs 15.1% (n=52) of patients initially consulted from an inpatient setting (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this cohort, we demonstrated that patients admitted on repeat ICU consultation have no significant difference in mortality compared with equivalent patients admitted after the first consultation. Understanding and further exploring the consequences of these ICU reconsultations is vital to developing optimal critical care triaging practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/cf/main.PMC10482889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To better understand the mortality and notable characteristics of patients initially denied intensive care unit (ICU) admission that are later admitted on reconsultation.

Patients and Methods

We collected data regarding all adult inpatients (n=3725) who received one or more ICU consults at an academic tertiary care hospital medical center between January 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021. We compared patients who were initially denied ICU admission and later admitted on reconsultation (C2A1, n=144) with those who were admitted after the first consultation (C1A1, n=2286) and those denied at first consult and never later admitted (C1A0, n=1295).

Results

Ten percent of patients initially rejected by the ICU were later admitted on reconsultation. There was no significant difference in the adjusted hospital death odds ratios between C1A1 and C2A1 (0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.01; P=.11). Assessing subgroups of the C2A1 population, we found that 8.2% (n=100) of full code patients were later admitted to the ICU on reconsultation vs 23.2% (n=40) of do not attempt resuscitation patients (P<.001); 7.6% (n=77) of patients initially consulted from the emergency department were later admitted to the ICU on reconsultation vs 15.1% (n=52) of patients initially consulted from an inpatient setting (P<.001).

Conclusion

In this cohort, we demonstrated that patients admitted on repeat ICU consultation have no significant difference in mortality compared with equivalent patients admitted after the first consultation. Understanding and further exploring the consequences of these ICU reconsultations is vital to developing optimal critical care triaging practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要重复重症监护病房会诊的患者的特征和结果
目的更好地了解最初拒绝入住重症监护室(ICU)的患者的死亡率和显著特征,这些患者后来在再次咨询时入院。患者和方法我们收集了2018年1月1日至2021年10月1日期间在学术三级护理医院医疗中心接受一次或多次ICU咨询的所有成年住院患者(n=3725)的数据。我们比较了最初被拒绝进入ICU并在再次会诊后入院的患者(C2A1,n=144)、第一次会诊后入院(C1A1,n=2286)和第一次会诊时被拒绝但后来再也没有入院(C1A0,n=1295)。C1A1和C2A1之间调整后的医院死亡优势比没有显著差异(0.67;95%CI 0.43-1.01;P=.11)。评估C2A1人群的亚组,我们发现8.2%(n=100)的全代码患者后来在重新咨询时入住ICU,而23.2%(n=40)的不尝试复苏的患者(P<;.001);最初从急诊科咨询的患者中,7.6%(n=77)的患者在再次咨询后被送入ICU,而最初从住院环境咨询的患者为15.1%(n=52)(P<;.001),我们证明,与第一次会诊后入院的同等患者相比,重复ICU会诊后入院患者的死亡率没有显著差异。了解并进一步探索这些ICU再咨询的后果对于制定最佳重症监护试验实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1