Nighttime working as perceived by Italian anesthesiologists: a secondary analysis of an international survey.

Alberto Nicolò Galvano, Mariachiara Ippolito, Alberto Noto, Inès Lakbar, Sharon Einav, Antonino Giarratano, Andrea Cortegiani
{"title":"Nighttime working as perceived by Italian anesthesiologists: a secondary analysis of an international survey.","authors":"Alberto Nicolò Galvano, Mariachiara Ippolito, Alberto Noto, Inès Lakbar, Sharon Einav, Antonino Giarratano, Andrea Cortegiani","doi":"10.1186/s44158-023-00119-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No data are available on the working conditions and workload of anesthesiologists during perioperative nighttime work in Italy and on the perceived risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 1085 responses out of the 5292 from the whole dataset. Most of the responders (76%) declared working a median of 12 consecutive hours during night shifts, with an irregular nightshift schedule (70%). More than half of the responders stated to receive a call 2-4 (40%) or 5 times or more (25%) to perform emergency procedures and/or ICU activities during night shifts. More than 70% of the responders declared having relaxation rooms for nighttime work (74%) but none to be used after a nightshift before going back home (82%) and no free meals, snacks, or beverages (89%). Furthermore, almost all (95%) of the surveyed anesthesiologists declared not having received specifical training or education on how to work at night, and that no institutional program has been held by the hospital to monitor fatigue or stress for night workers (99%). More than half of the responders stated having the possibility, sometimes (38%) or always (45%), to involve another colleague in difficult medical decisions and to feel comfortable, sometimes (31%) or always (35%), to call the on-call colleague. Participants declared that nighttime work affects their quality of life extremely (14%) or significantly (63%), and that sleep deprivation, fatigue, and current working conditions may reduce performance (67%) and increase risk for the patients (74%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Italian anesthesiologists declare current nighttime practice to negatively affect their quality of life, and their performance, and are thus concerned for their patients' safety. Proper education on night work, starting from traineeship, and implementing institutional programs to monitor stress and fatigue of operators and to support them during nighttime work could be a mean to improve nighttime work conditions and safety for both patients and healthcare workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"3 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494393/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00119-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: No data are available on the working conditions and workload of anesthesiologists during perioperative nighttime work in Italy and on the perceived risks.

Results: We analyzed 1085 responses out of the 5292 from the whole dataset. Most of the responders (76%) declared working a median of 12 consecutive hours during night shifts, with an irregular nightshift schedule (70%). More than half of the responders stated to receive a call 2-4 (40%) or 5 times or more (25%) to perform emergency procedures and/or ICU activities during night shifts. More than 70% of the responders declared having relaxation rooms for nighttime work (74%) but none to be used after a nightshift before going back home (82%) and no free meals, snacks, or beverages (89%). Furthermore, almost all (95%) of the surveyed anesthesiologists declared not having received specifical training or education on how to work at night, and that no institutional program has been held by the hospital to monitor fatigue or stress for night workers (99%). More than half of the responders stated having the possibility, sometimes (38%) or always (45%), to involve another colleague in difficult medical decisions and to feel comfortable, sometimes (31%) or always (35%), to call the on-call colleague. Participants declared that nighttime work affects their quality of life extremely (14%) or significantly (63%), and that sleep deprivation, fatigue, and current working conditions may reduce performance (67%) and increase risk for the patients (74%).

Conclusions: Italian anesthesiologists declare current nighttime practice to negatively affect their quality of life, and their performance, and are thus concerned for their patients' safety. Proper education on night work, starting from traineeship, and implementing institutional programs to monitor stress and fatigue of operators and to support them during nighttime work could be a mean to improve nighttime work conditions and safety for both patients and healthcare workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利麻醉师对夜间工作的看法:一项国际调查的二次分析。
背景:没有关于意大利夜间围手术期麻醉医师工作条件和工作量以及感知风险的数据。结果:我们分析了整个数据集中5292个回复中的1085个。大多数应答者(76%)表示在夜班期间连续工作中位数为12小时,夜班时间表不规律(70%)。超过一半的应答者表示,他们在夜班期间接到2-4次(40%)或5次或更多的电话,要求执行急诊程序和/或ICU活动。超过70%的受访者表示有夜间工作的放松室(74%),但夜班结束后回家前没有放松室(82%),也没有免费的餐点、零食或饮料(89%)。此外,几乎所有接受调查的麻醉师(95%)都表示没有接受过关于夜间工作的专门培训或教育,医院也没有举办过监测夜班工人疲劳或压力的机构方案(99%)。超过一半的受访者表示,他们有时(38%)或总是(45%)有可能让另一位同事参与艰难的医疗决定,有时(31%)或总是(35%)愿意打电话给随叫随到的同事。参与者表示,夜间工作对他们的生活质量影响极大(14%)或显著(63%),睡眠不足、疲劳和当前的工作条件可能会降低工作表现(67%),并增加患者的风险(74%)。结论:意大利麻醉师宣称目前的夜间操作对他们的生活质量和工作表现有负面影响,因此他们担心患者的安全。适当的夜间工作教育,从实习开始,并实施机构计划,以监测操作员的压力和疲劳,并在夜间工作期间为他们提供支持,这可能是改善夜间工作条件和患者和医护人员安全的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe bronchiolitis before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective database analysis by the Italian Network of PICU study group (TIPNet). Understanding neuropathic pain: the role of neurophysiological tests in unveiling underlying mechanisms. Erector spinae plane block for cancer pain relief: a systematic review. Echocardiographic evaluation in patient candidate for liver transplant: from pathophysiology to hemodynamic optimization. Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1