Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1177/00187208231189661
Zheng Ma, Yiqi Zhang
{"title":"Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.","authors":"Zheng Ma, Yiqi Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00187208231189661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the impact of driving styles of drivers and automated vehicles (AVs) on drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers and quantified the relationships among drivers' perception of AV maneuvers, driver trust, and acceptance of AVs.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies on automated driving styles focused on the impact of AV's global driving style on driver's attitude and driving performance. However, research on drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers at the specific driving style level is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixteen aggressive drivers and sixteen defensive drivers were recruited to experience twelve driving scenarios in either an aggressive AV or a defensive AV on the driving simulator. Their perception of AV maneuvers, trust, and acceptance was measured via questionnaires, and driving performance was collected via the driving simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that drivers' trust and acceptance of AVs would decrease significantly if they perceived AVs to have a higher speed, larger deceleration, smaller deceleration, or shorter stopping distance than expected. Moreover, defensive drivers perceived significantly greater inappropriateness of these maneuvers from aggressive AVs than defensive AVs, whereas aggressive drivers didn't differ significantly in their perceived inappropriateness of these maneuvers with different driving styles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The driving styles of automated vehicles and drivers influenced drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers, which influence their trust and acceptance of AVs.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>This study suggested that the design of AVs should consider drivers' perceptions of automated driving maneuvers to avoid undermining drivers' trust and acceptance of AVs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231189661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the impact of driving styles of drivers and automated vehicles (AVs) on drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers and quantified the relationships among drivers' perception of AV maneuvers, driver trust, and acceptance of AVs.

Background: Previous studies on automated driving styles focused on the impact of AV's global driving style on driver's attitude and driving performance. However, research on drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers at the specific driving style level is still lacking.

Method: Sixteen aggressive drivers and sixteen defensive drivers were recruited to experience twelve driving scenarios in either an aggressive AV or a defensive AV on the driving simulator. Their perception of AV maneuvers, trust, and acceptance was measured via questionnaires, and driving performance was collected via the driving simulator.

Results: Results revealed that drivers' trust and acceptance of AVs would decrease significantly if they perceived AVs to have a higher speed, larger deceleration, smaller deceleration, or shorter stopping distance than expected. Moreover, defensive drivers perceived significantly greater inappropriateness of these maneuvers from aggressive AVs than defensive AVs, whereas aggressive drivers didn't differ significantly in their perceived inappropriateness of these maneuvers with different driving styles.

Conclusion: The driving styles of automated vehicles and drivers influenced drivers' perception of automated driving maneuvers, which influence their trust and acceptance of AVs.

Application: This study suggested that the design of AVs should consider drivers' perceptions of automated driving maneuvers to avoid undermining drivers' trust and acceptance of AVs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养驾驶员对自动驾驶方式的信任:驾驶员对自动驾驶操纵的感知所起的作用。
研究目的本研究调查了驾驶员和自动驾驶汽车(AV)的驾驶风格对驾驶员自动驾驶操作感知的影响,并量化了驾驶员对自动驾驶汽车操作感知、驾驶员信任度和对自动驾驶汽车接受度之间的关系:背景:以往关于自动驾驶风格的研究主要集中在自动驾驶汽车的整体驾驶风格对驾驶员态度和驾驶表现的影响上。背景:以往关于自动驾驶风格的研究主要集中在自动驾驶汽车的整体驾驶风格对驾驶员态度和驾驶表现的影响上,但对驾驶员在具体驾驶风格层面对自动驾驶操作的感知还缺乏研究:方法:招募了 16 名激进型驾驶员和 16 名防御型驾驶员,让他们在驾驶模拟器上体验激进型自动驾驶汽车或防御型自动驾驶汽车的 12 个驾驶场景。结果:结果表明,驾驶员的信任度和接受度均高于其他驾驶员:结果显示,如果驾驶员认为自动驾驶汽车的速度比预期的高、减速比预期的大、减速比预期的小或停车距离比预期的短,那么他们对自动驾驶汽车的信任度和接受度就会明显下降。此外,防御性驾驶员认为攻击性自动驾驶汽车的这些操作的不适宜性明显高于防御性自动驾驶汽车,而攻击性驾驶员在不同驾驶风格下对这些操作的不适宜性的感知没有明显差异:结论:自动驾驶汽车和驾驶员的驾驶风格会影响驾驶员对自动驾驶操作的感知,从而影响他们对自动驾驶汽车的信任度和接受度:本研究建议,在设计自动驾驶汽车时应考虑驾驶员对自动驾驶操作的感知,以避免削弱驾驶员对自动驾驶汽车的信任和接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Tunneling in Pilots During a Visual Tracking Task With a Head Mounted Display. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability. An Automobile's Tail Lights: Sacrificing Safety for Playful Design? Virtual Reality Adaptive Training for Personalized Stress Inoculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1