Comparison of three different dosages of low-level laser therapy on expression of cell proliferation and inflammatory markers following ovariohysterectomy in rats.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1080/15569527.2023.2252075
Bülent Polat, Damla Tuğçe Okur, Armağan Çolak, Sıtkıcan Okur, Mustafa Özkaraca, Kader Yilmaz
{"title":"Comparison of three different dosages of low-level laser therapy on expression of cell proliferation and inflammatory markers following ovariohysterectomy in rats.","authors":"Bülent Polat,&nbsp;Damla Tuğçe Okur,&nbsp;Armağan Çolak,&nbsp;Sıtkıcan Okur,&nbsp;Mustafa Özkaraca,&nbsp;Kader Yilmaz","doi":"10.1080/15569527.2023.2252075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the healing of incisional wounds following ovariohysterectomy in rats, by means of subjective histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. A total of 72 female Wistar rats were categorised into four treatment groups (Group I; sacrification 4 hours following only one LLLT application, Group II; sacrification 7 days following only one LLLT application, Group III; sacrification 4 hours after two LLLT applications, and Group IV; sacrification 7 days after two LLLT applications). Each group was further divided into four different doses subgroups (Group Control [C, off mode LLLT application], L<sub>1</sub> [1 J/cm<sup>2</sup>], L<sub>3</sub> [3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>], and L<sub>6</sub> [6 J/cm<sup>2</sup>]), with equal representation in each subgroup. Ovariohysterectomy was employed using two 2-cm-length midline abdominal incisions in the left and right sides of line alba. The Group C was assigned to the left side incision to each rat in the study. After irradiation, the tissue was subjected to histopathological analysis to determine the extent of mononuclear cell infiltration, edoema, and epithelialization. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pCNA) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Group L<sub>1</sub> and L<sub>3</sub> significantly decreased mononuclear cell infiltration compared with Group C in all treatment groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Group L<sub>3</sub> significantly decreased edoema compared with Group C in all groups except for treatment Group I (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Group L<sub>2</sub> and L<sub>3</sub> significantly increased epithelization in treatment Group IV (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Moreover, Group L<sub>2</sub> and L<sub>3</sub> significantly increased pCNA in all groups, while L<sub>2</sub> and L<sub>3</sub> significantly decreased iNOS expression in treatment Group II, III, and IV (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found between subgroups of treatment Group I in iNOS expiration (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The results of the current examination demonstrated that LLLT can modulate mononuclear cell infiltration and edoema, and improve epithelization, as well as increase pCNA expression, whereas decrease iNOS expression during the wound healing process, therefore enhancing wound healing following ovariohysterectomy in rats.</p>","PeriodicalId":11023,"journal":{"name":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"273-282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2023.2252075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to evaluate Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the healing of incisional wounds following ovariohysterectomy in rats, by means of subjective histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. A total of 72 female Wistar rats were categorised into four treatment groups (Group I; sacrification 4 hours following only one LLLT application, Group II; sacrification 7 days following only one LLLT application, Group III; sacrification 4 hours after two LLLT applications, and Group IV; sacrification 7 days after two LLLT applications). Each group was further divided into four different doses subgroups (Group Control [C, off mode LLLT application], L1 [1 J/cm2], L3 [3 J/cm2], and L6 [6 J/cm2]), with equal representation in each subgroup. Ovariohysterectomy was employed using two 2-cm-length midline abdominal incisions in the left and right sides of line alba. The Group C was assigned to the left side incision to each rat in the study. After irradiation, the tissue was subjected to histopathological analysis to determine the extent of mononuclear cell infiltration, edoema, and epithelialization. Additionally, immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pCNA) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Group L1 and L3 significantly decreased mononuclear cell infiltration compared with Group C in all treatment groups (p < 0.05). Group L3 significantly decreased edoema compared with Group C in all groups except for treatment Group I (p < 0.05). Group L2 and L3 significantly increased epithelization in treatment Group IV (p < 0.05). Moreover, Group L2 and L3 significantly increased pCNA in all groups, while L2 and L3 significantly decreased iNOS expression in treatment Group II, III, and IV (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found between subgroups of treatment Group I in iNOS expiration (p > 0.05). The results of the current examination demonstrated that LLLT can modulate mononuclear cell infiltration and edoema, and improve epithelization, as well as increase pCNA expression, whereas decrease iNOS expression during the wound healing process, therefore enhancing wound healing following ovariohysterectomy in rats.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同剂量低水平激光治疗对大鼠卵巢子宫切除术后细胞增殖和炎症标志物表达的比较。
本研究的目的是通过主观组织病理学和免疫组织化学分析,评估低水平激光治疗(LLLT)对大鼠卵巢子宫切除术后切口愈合的影响。共有72只雌性Wistar大鼠被分为四个治疗组(组I;神圣化4 仅一次LLLT申请后数小时,第II组;神圣化7 仅一次LLLT申请后的第三组;神圣化4 两次LLLT应用后数小时,以及第IV组;神圣化7 两次LLLT申请后几天)。每组进一步分为四个不同剂量的亚组(组对照[C,非模式LLLT应用]、L1[1J/cm2]、L3[3J/cm2]和L6[6J/cm2]),每个亚组的代表性相等。卵巢子宫切除术采用两个2厘米长的腹部中线切口,分别位于白线的左侧和右侧。C组被分配到研究中每只大鼠的左侧切口。照射后,对组织进行组织病理学分析,以确定单核细胞浸润、水肿和上皮化的程度。此外,进行免疫组织化学分析以评估增殖细胞核抗原(pCNA)和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)的表达。在所有治疗组中,与C组相比,L1组和L3组的单核细胞浸润显著减少(p 3与C组相比,除治疗组I外,所有组的水肿均显著降低(p 2和L3在治疗组IV中显著增加上皮化(p 2和L3在所有组中都显著增加了pCNA,而L2和L3在治疗组II、III和IV中显著降低了iNOS的表达(p p > 0.05)。目前的检查结果表明,LLLT可以调节单核细胞浸润和水肿,改善上皮化,增加pCNA的表达,而在伤口愈合过程中降低iNOS的表达,从而促进大鼠卵巢子宫切除术后的伤口愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
40
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all types of harm to cutaneous and ocular systems. Areas of particular interest include pharmaceutical and medical products; consumer, personal care, and household products; and issues in environmental and occupational exposures. In addition to original research papers, reviews and short communications are invited, as well as concise, relevant, and critical reviews of topics of contemporary significance.
期刊最新文献
Effects on corneal endothelium of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs. Correction. Isotretinoin increases non-insulin-based surrogate markers of insulin resistance in acne vulgaris patients. The treatment efficacy of 7.5% dapsone gel in papulopustular rosacea: a prospective study. Anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and morphological impact of phycocyanin on ultraviolet radiation irradiated human fibroblast cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1