Association between initial presenting level of consciousness and patient acuity – A potential application for secondary triage in emergency ambulance calls

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Australasian Emergency Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2022.11.002
Jason Belcher , Judith Finn , Austin Whiteside , Stephen Ball
{"title":"Association between initial presenting level of consciousness and patient acuity – A potential application for secondary triage in emergency ambulance calls","authors":"Jason Belcher ,&nbsp;Judith Finn ,&nbsp;Austin Whiteside ,&nbsp;Stephen Ball","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Conscious state assessment is important for the triage of emergency patients. In this study, we measured the association between ambulance patients’ conscious state and high versus lower acuity, with a view to informing telephone triage assessment of conscious state.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Data were analysed from one year of emergency ambulance incidents in Perth, Western Australia. Patient conscious state at the time of </span>paramedic arrival was compared to acuity (based on paramedic assessment and management). We determined the proportion of high-acuity patients across six levels of consciousness (Alert, Confused, Drowsy, Voice Response, Pain Response, Unresponsive) overall, and within individual protocols of the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>The proportion of high acuity patients increased with each step across the consciousness scale. Applying conscious state as a binary predictor of acuity, the largest increases occurred moving the threshold from Alert to Confused (22.0–48.6% high acuity) and Drowsy to Voice Response (61.9–89.5% high acuity). The </span>Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic was 0.65. Within individual protocols, the highest AUC was in Cardiac Arrest (0.89), Overdose/Poisoning (0.81), Unknown Problem (0.76), Diabetic Problem, (0.74) and Convulsions/Fitting (0.73); and lowest in Heart problems (0.55), Abdominal Pain (0.55), Breathing Problems (0.55), </span>Back Pain<span> (0.53), and Chest Pain (0.52).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on these proportions of high acuity patients, it is reasonable to consider patients with any altered conscious state a high priority. The value of conscious state assessment for predicting acuity varies markedly between MPDS protocols. These findings could help inform secondary triage of ambulance patients during the emergency call.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Conscious state assessment is important for the triage of emergency patients. In this study, we measured the association between ambulance patients’ conscious state and high versus lower acuity, with a view to informing telephone triage assessment of conscious state.

Methods

Data were analysed from one year of emergency ambulance incidents in Perth, Western Australia. Patient conscious state at the time of paramedic arrival was compared to acuity (based on paramedic assessment and management). We determined the proportion of high-acuity patients across six levels of consciousness (Alert, Confused, Drowsy, Voice Response, Pain Response, Unresponsive) overall, and within individual protocols of the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS).

Results

The proportion of high acuity patients increased with each step across the consciousness scale. Applying conscious state as a binary predictor of acuity, the largest increases occurred moving the threshold from Alert to Confused (22.0–48.6% high acuity) and Drowsy to Voice Response (61.9–89.5% high acuity). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic was 0.65. Within individual protocols, the highest AUC was in Cardiac Arrest (0.89), Overdose/Poisoning (0.81), Unknown Problem (0.76), Diabetic Problem, (0.74) and Convulsions/Fitting (0.73); and lowest in Heart problems (0.55), Abdominal Pain (0.55), Breathing Problems (0.55), Back Pain (0.53), and Chest Pain (0.52).

Conclusion

Based on these proportions of high acuity patients, it is reasonable to consider patients with any altered conscious state a high priority. The value of conscious state assessment for predicting acuity varies markedly between MPDS protocols. These findings could help inform secondary triage of ambulance patients during the emergency call.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最初表现的意识水平和病人的敏锐度之间的联系——在紧急救护车呼叫中二级分诊的潜在应用
意识状态评估对急诊病人的分诊很重要。在这项研究中,我们测量了救护车患者的意识状态与高视力和低视力之间的关系,以期为意识状态的电话分诊评估提供信息。方法对西澳大利亚州珀斯市一年的急救车事故数据进行分析。将护理人员到达时的患者意识状态与视力进行比较(基于护理人员的评估和管理)。我们确定了六种意识水平(警觉、困惑、嗜睡、声音反应、疼痛反应、无反应)的高敏锐度患者的比例,并在医疗优先调度系统(MPDS)的各个协议范围内。将意识状态作为敏锐度的二元预测指标,最大的增长发生在将阈值从警觉移动到困惑(22.0–48.6%的高敏锐度)和眩晕移动到声音反应(61.9–89.5%的高敏度)。受试者工作特性的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.65。在个体方案中,AUC最高的是心脏骤停(0.89)、过量用药/中毒(0.81)、未知问题(0.76)、糖尿病问题(0.74)和惊厥/拟合(0.73);心脏问题(0.55)、腹痛(0.55。意识状态评估对预测敏锐度的价值在MPDS方案之间存在显著差异。这些发现有助于在紧急呼叫期间对救护车患者进行二次分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket. First Nations women's experiences of out-of-hospital childbirth: Insights for enhancing paramedic practice - A scoping review. The experiences of trans (binary and non-binary) people accessing emergency department care in Australia: A grounded theory study. Gender bias in text-to-image generative artificial intelligence depiction of Australian paramedics and first responders. The Clinical Frailty Scale offers little utility as part of a prediction model for community-dwelling older fallers at risk of re-presenting to the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1