The Clinical Frailty Scale offers little utility as part of a prediction model for community-dwelling older fallers at risk of re-presenting to the emergency department.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Australasian Emergency Care Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2024.11.004
Loren Barton, Mark Nelson, Kirsten Strudwick, Corey Scholes
{"title":"The Clinical Frailty Scale offers little utility as part of a prediction model for community-dwelling older fallers at risk of re-presenting to the emergency department.","authors":"Loren Barton, Mark Nelson, Kirsten Strudwick, Corey Scholes","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no published literature on the predictive ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for falls risk specific to the Emergency Department (ED) population. This study aims to develop a prognostic model to determine the predictive ability of the CFS for ED falls' re-presentation in community-dwelling older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was completed from July 2019 to July 2022 on community dwelling people aged 75 years and over who presented to the ED with an extrinsic fall and had a CFS score recorded. The primary outcome was fall-related re-presentation to ED; the secondary outcome was mortality. A flexible parametric survival model was applied with time to falls re-presentation, and post-estimation, used to predict the probability of another fall re-presentation within 6 months. Calibration was assessed and a decision support curve generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model demonstrated reasonable calibration-in-the-large (Slope = 0.999) and fit between CFS and probability of fall re-presentation. The CFS model displayed negligible discriminant ability (C-statistic = 0.534) for identifying older people at risk of falls-related ED re-presentations within 6 months of index presentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CFS cannot be used to prognosticate an individual's risk of ED re-presentation within 6 months of an index extrinsic fall.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.11.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no published literature on the predictive ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for falls risk specific to the Emergency Department (ED) population. This study aims to develop a prognostic model to determine the predictive ability of the CFS for ED falls' re-presentation in community-dwelling older people.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was completed from July 2019 to July 2022 on community dwelling people aged 75 years and over who presented to the ED with an extrinsic fall and had a CFS score recorded. The primary outcome was fall-related re-presentation to ED; the secondary outcome was mortality. A flexible parametric survival model was applied with time to falls re-presentation, and post-estimation, used to predict the probability of another fall re-presentation within 6 months. Calibration was assessed and a decision support curve generated.

Results: The model demonstrated reasonable calibration-in-the-large (Slope = 0.999) and fit between CFS and probability of fall re-presentation. The CFS model displayed negligible discriminant ability (C-statistic = 0.534) for identifying older people at risk of falls-related ED re-presentations within 6 months of index presentation.

Conclusions: The CFS cannot be used to prognosticate an individual's risk of ED re-presentation within 6 months of an index extrinsic fall.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket. First Nations women's experiences of out-of-hospital childbirth: Insights for enhancing paramedic practice - A scoping review. The experiences of trans (binary and non-binary) people accessing emergency department care in Australia: A grounded theory study. Gender bias in text-to-image generative artificial intelligence depiction of Australian paramedics and first responders. The Clinical Frailty Scale offers little utility as part of a prediction model for community-dwelling older fallers at risk of re-presenting to the emergency department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1