Vigilance Decrement During On-Road Partially Automated Driving Across Four Systems.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1177/00187208231189658
Francesco N Biondi, Amy S McDonnell, Mobina Mahmoodzadeh, Noor Jajo, Balakumar Balasingam, David L Strayer
{"title":"Vigilance Decrement During On-Road Partially Automated Driving Across Four Systems.","authors":"Francesco N Biondi, Amy S McDonnell, Mobina Mahmoodzadeh, Noor Jajo, Balakumar Balasingam, David L Strayer","doi":"10.1177/00187208231189658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study uses a detection task to measure changes in driver vigilance when operating four different partially automated systems.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Research show temporal declines in detection task performance during manual and fully automated driving, but the accuracy of using this approach for measuring changes in driver vigilance during on-road partially automated driving is yet unproven.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants drove four different vehicles (Tesla Model 3, Cadillac CT6, Volvo XC90, and Nissan Rogue) equipped with level-2 systems in manual and partially automated modes. Response times to a detection task were recorded over eight consecutive time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian analysis revealed a main effect of time period and an interaction between mode and time period. A main effect of vehicle and a time period x vehicle interaction were also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicated that the reduction in detection task performance over time was worse during partially automated driving. Vehicle-specific analysis also revealed that detection task performance changed across vehicles, with slowest response time found for the Volvo.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>The greater decline in detection performance found in automated mode suggests that operating level-2 systems incurred in a greater vigilance decrement, a phenomenon that is of interest for Human Factors practitioners and regulators. We also argue that the observed vehicle-related differences are attributable to the unique design of their in-vehicle interfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231189658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study uses a detection task to measure changes in driver vigilance when operating four different partially automated systems.

Background: Research show temporal declines in detection task performance during manual and fully automated driving, but the accuracy of using this approach for measuring changes in driver vigilance during on-road partially automated driving is yet unproven.

Method: Participants drove four different vehicles (Tesla Model 3, Cadillac CT6, Volvo XC90, and Nissan Rogue) equipped with level-2 systems in manual and partially automated modes. Response times to a detection task were recorded over eight consecutive time periods.

Results: Bayesian analysis revealed a main effect of time period and an interaction between mode and time period. A main effect of vehicle and a time period x vehicle interaction were also found.

Conclusion: Results indicated that the reduction in detection task performance over time was worse during partially automated driving. Vehicle-specific analysis also revealed that detection task performance changed across vehicles, with slowest response time found for the Volvo.

Application: The greater decline in detection performance found in automated mode suggests that operating level-2 systems incurred in a greater vigilance decrement, a phenomenon that is of interest for Human Factors practitioners and regulators. We also argue that the observed vehicle-related differences are attributable to the unique design of their in-vehicle interfaces.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种系统在公路部分自动驾驶过程中的警觉性下降。
目的: 本研究使用检测任务来测量驾驶员在操作四种不同的部分自动化系统时的警惕性变化:本研究使用检测任务来测量驾驶员在操作四种不同的部分自动驾驶系统时警惕性的变化:研究表明,在手动和全自动驾驶过程中,检测任务的表现会出现时间性下降,但使用这种方法测量驾驶员在道路部分自动驾驶过程中警惕性变化的准确性尚未得到证实:方法:受试者在手动和部分自动驾驶模式下驾驶四种不同的车辆(特斯拉 Model 3、凯迪拉克 CT6、沃尔沃 XC90 和日产 Rogue),这些车辆都配备了 2 级系统。在连续八个时间段内记录检测任务的响应时间:贝叶斯分析表明,时间段具有主效应,模式与时间段之间存在交互作用。此外,还发现了车辆的主效应以及时间段 x 车辆之间的交互作用:结果表明,在部分自动驾驶过程中,检测任务的成绩随时间的推移下降得更厉害。针对不同车辆的分析还显示,不同车辆的检测任务表现也不同,沃尔沃的反应时间最慢:应用:在自动驾驶模式下检测性能的下降幅度更大,这表明操作 2 级系统会导致警惕性下降,这一现象引起了人为因素从业人员和监管人员的兴趣。我们还认为,观察到的车辆相关差异可归因于其车载界面的独特设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Tunneling in Pilots During a Visual Tracking Task With a Head Mounted Display. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability. An Automobile's Tail Lights: Sacrificing Safety for Playful Design? Virtual Reality Adaptive Training for Personalized Stress Inoculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1