Assessment of resolution and noise in magnetic resonance images reconstructed by data driven approaches.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.08.007
Jonas Kleineisel, Katja Lauer, Alfio Borzì, Thorsten A Bley, Herbert Köstler, Tobias Wech
{"title":"Assessment of resolution and noise in magnetic resonance images reconstructed by data driven approaches.","authors":"Jonas Kleineisel,&nbsp;Katja Lauer,&nbsp;Alfio Borzì,&nbsp;Thorsten A Bley,&nbsp;Herbert Köstler,&nbsp;Tobias Wech","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deep learning-based approaches are increasingly being used for the reconstruction of accelerated MRI scans. However, presented analyses are frequently lacking in-detail evaluation of basal measures like resolution or signal-to-noise ratio. To help closing this gap, spatially resolved maps of image resolution and noise enhancement (g-factor) are determined and assessed for typical model- and data-driven MR reconstruction methods in this paper.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MR data from a routine brain scan of a patient were undersampled in retrospect at R = 4 and reconstructed using two data-driven (variational network (VN), U-Net) and two model based reconstructions methods (GRAPPA, TV-constrained compressed sensing). Local resolution was estimated by the width of the main-lobe of a local point-spread function, which was determined for every single pixel by reconstructing images with an additional small perturbation. G-factor maps were determined using a multiple replica method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GRAPPA showed good spatial resolution, but increased g-factors (1.43-1.84, 75% quartile) over all other methods. The images delivered from compressed sensing suffered most from low local resolution, in particular in homogeneous areas of the image. VN and U-Net show similar resolution with mostly moderate local blurring, slightly better for U-Net. For all methods except GRAPPA the resolution as well as the g-factors depend on the anatomy and the direction of undersampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objective image quality parameters, local resolution and g-factors have been determined. The examined data driven methods show less local blurring than compressed sensing. The noise enhancement for reconstructions using CS, VN and U-Net is elevated at anatomical contours but is drastically reduced with respect to GRAPPA. Overall, the applied framework provides the possibility for more detailed analysis of novel reconstruction approaches incorporating non-linear and non-stationary transformations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.08.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Deep learning-based approaches are increasingly being used for the reconstruction of accelerated MRI scans. However, presented analyses are frequently lacking in-detail evaluation of basal measures like resolution or signal-to-noise ratio. To help closing this gap, spatially resolved maps of image resolution and noise enhancement (g-factor) are determined and assessed for typical model- and data-driven MR reconstruction methods in this paper.

Methods: MR data from a routine brain scan of a patient were undersampled in retrospect at R = 4 and reconstructed using two data-driven (variational network (VN), U-Net) and two model based reconstructions methods (GRAPPA, TV-constrained compressed sensing). Local resolution was estimated by the width of the main-lobe of a local point-spread function, which was determined for every single pixel by reconstructing images with an additional small perturbation. G-factor maps were determined using a multiple replica method.

Results: GRAPPA showed good spatial resolution, but increased g-factors (1.43-1.84, 75% quartile) over all other methods. The images delivered from compressed sensing suffered most from low local resolution, in particular in homogeneous areas of the image. VN and U-Net show similar resolution with mostly moderate local blurring, slightly better for U-Net. For all methods except GRAPPA the resolution as well as the g-factors depend on the anatomy and the direction of undersampling.

Conclusion: Objective image quality parameters, local resolution and g-factors have been determined. The examined data driven methods show less local blurring than compressed sensing. The noise enhancement for reconstructions using CS, VN and U-Net is elevated at anatomical contours but is drastically reduced with respect to GRAPPA. Overall, the applied framework provides the possibility for more detailed analysis of novel reconstruction approaches incorporating non-linear and non-stationary transformations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用数据驱动方法重建磁共振图像的分辨率和噪声评估。
基于深度学习的方法越来越多地被用于加速MRI扫描的重建。然而,目前的分析往往缺乏对分辨率或信噪比等基本指标的详细评估。为了帮助缩小这一差距,本文确定并评估了典型模型和数据驱动的MR重建方法的图像分辨率和噪声增强(g因子)的空间分辨图。方法:对1例患者常规脑部扫描的MR数据在R = 4处进行欠采样,并使用两种数据驱动(变分网络(VN)、U-Net)和两种基于模型的重建方法(GRAPPA、电视约束压缩感知)进行重建。局部分辨率是通过局部点扩散函数的主瓣宽度来估计的,该主瓣宽度是通过附加小扰动重建图像来确定的。使用多重复制方法确定g因子图。结果:GRAPPA具有良好的空间分辨率,但g因子(1.43 ~ 1.84,75%四分位数)高于其他方法。压缩感知传递的图像最容易受到低局部分辨率的影响,特别是在图像的均匀区域。VN和U-Net显示出相似的分辨率,大多是适度的局部模糊,U-Net稍微好一点。对于除GRAPPA外的所有方法,分辨率和g因子取决于解剖结构和欠采样方向。结论:确定了客观图像质量参数、局部分辨率和g因子。所研究的数据驱动方法比压缩感知显示更少的局部模糊。使用CS, VN和U-Net重建的噪声增强在解剖轮廓处升高,但相对于GRAPPA则大大降低。总的来说,应用框架为更详细地分析包含非线性和非平稳变换的新型重建方法提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Development and clinical implementation of a digital system for risk assessments for radiation therapy End-to-end testing for stereotactic radiotherapy including the development of a Multi-Modality phantom Note on uncertainty in Monte Carlo dose calculations and its relation to microdosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1