Comparative Efficacy of Topical Finasteride (0.25%) in Combination with Minoxidil (5%) Against 5% Minoxidil or 0.25% Finasteride Alone in Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Pilot, Randomized Open-Label Study.

Q2 Medicine International Journal of Trichology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.4103/ijt.ijt_72_22
Apoorva V Bharadwaj, Vibhu Mendiratta, Harmeet Singh Rehan, Smita Tripathi
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Topical Finasteride (0.25%) in Combination with Minoxidil (5%) Against 5% Minoxidil or 0.25% Finasteride Alone in Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Pilot, Randomized Open-Label Study.","authors":"Apoorva V Bharadwaj,&nbsp;Vibhu Mendiratta,&nbsp;Harmeet Singh Rehan,&nbsp;Smita Tripathi","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_72_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in males which remains a therapeutic challenge.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of topical 5% minoxidil and 0.25% finasteride combination (MNF) over 5% minoxidil (MNX) or 0.25% finasteride (FNS) alone by assessing hair count, physician assessment score (PAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pilot randomized open-label study where 60 male patients with AGA ≥ III grade were randomized into three treatment groups and evaluated over 24 weeks. Improvement in hair count was assessed manually using dermoscopy. Global photographs were used to assess PAS. Side effects were evaluated using relevant laboratory investigations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 12<sup>th</sup> and 24<sup>th</sup> week, all three groups showed significant improvement in total hair density as compared to baseline (<i>P</i> < 0.001). None of the groups was superior to the other (<i>P</i> > 0.05) at the 12<sup>th</sup> week but at 24<sup>th</sup> week, MNF was comparatively superior (<i>P</i> < 0.02). At the 12<sup>th</sup> week and 24<sup>th</sup> week, all three groups showed significant improvement in terminal hair density as compared to baseline (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In the 12<sup>th</sup> week, MNF was comparatively superior (<i>P</i> = 0.028) and at the 24<sup>th</sup> week, MNF was comparatively superior (<i>P</i> < 0.02). PAS and PSS were significantly better with MNF and MNX compared to FNS (<i>P</i> < 0.004). Side effects such as scaling and itching were reported with MNF and MNX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topical minoxidil 5% and finasteride 0.25% had an overall better efficacy compared to monotherapy without significant side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"15 2","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_72_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in males which remains a therapeutic challenge.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of topical 5% minoxidil and 0.25% finasteride combination (MNF) over 5% minoxidil (MNX) or 0.25% finasteride (FNS) alone by assessing hair count, physician assessment score (PAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).

Materials and methods: Pilot randomized open-label study where 60 male patients with AGA ≥ III grade were randomized into three treatment groups and evaluated over 24 weeks. Improvement in hair count was assessed manually using dermoscopy. Global photographs were used to assess PAS. Side effects were evaluated using relevant laboratory investigations.

Results: At the 12th and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in total hair density as compared to baseline (P < 0.001). None of the groups was superior to the other (P > 0.05) at the 12th week but at 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior (P < 0.02). At the 12th week and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in terminal hair density as compared to baseline (P < 0.001). In the 12th week, MNF was comparatively superior (P = 0.028) and at the 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior (P < 0.02). PAS and PSS were significantly better with MNF and MNX compared to FNS (P < 0.004). Side effects such as scaling and itching were reported with MNF and MNX.

Conclusion: Topical minoxidil 5% and finasteride 0.25% had an overall better efficacy compared to monotherapy without significant side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部非那雄胺(0.25%)联合米诺地尔(5%)与5%米诺地尔或0.25%非那雄醇单独治疗男性雄激素性脱发的疗效比较:一项先导性随机开放标签研究。
背景:雄激素性脱发(AGA)是男性脱发最常见的原因,这仍然是一个治疗挑战。目的:通过评估头发数量、医生评估评分(PAS)和患者满意度评分(PSS),比较局部使用5%米诺地尔和0.25%非那雄胺联合用药(MNF)与单独使用5%米诺地尔或0.25%非那雌胺(FNS)的疗效。材料和方法:60名AGA≥III级男性患者随机分为三个治疗组,并在24周内进行评估。使用皮肤镜手动评估毛发数量的改善情况。全球照片用于评估PAS。使用相关实验室调查评估副作用。结果:在第12周和第24周,三组的总发密度均较基线有显著改善(P<0.001)。在第12周时,三组均未优于其他组(P>0.05),但在第24周时,与基线相比,三组的终发密度都有显著改善(P<0.001)。第12周,MNF相对较好(P=0.028),第24周MNF相对较优(P<0.02)。与FNS相比,MNF和MNX的PAS和PSS明显较好(P<0.004)。MNF和MNX有结垢和瘙痒等副作用。结论:与单一治疗相比,局部使用5%米诺地尔和0.25%非那雄胺具有更好的疗效,没有显著的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Cross-sectional Observational Study to Correlate the Trichoscopic Findings of Female Pattern Hair Loss with the Disease Severity and Underlying Histopathological Changes. A Study of Serum Ferritin and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels in Male Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia. Alopecia Areata with Renal Dysgenesis. Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur Syndrome with Mucosal Involvement: A Rare Case. Mucinous Lupus Alopecia with Papulonodular Mucinosis as a Sole Cutaneous Manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1