Population risk profile analysis of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Mohammed Al-Tawil, Alexander Geragotellis, Matti Jubouri, Sven Zcp Tan, Idhrees Mohammed, Ian Williams, Mohamad Bashir
{"title":"Population risk profile analysis of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Mohammed Al-Tawil,&nbsp;Alexander Geragotellis,&nbsp;Matti Jubouri,&nbsp;Sven Zcp Tan,&nbsp;Idhrees Mohammed,&nbsp;Ian Williams,&nbsp;Mohamad Bashir","doi":"10.1177/02184923221099771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (unTBAD) comprises the estimated majority of type B aortic dissection (TBAD), presenting without any of the complications associated with complicated TBAD (coTBAD). Although first-line treatment for coTBAD is thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and despite the fact that TEVAR has proven its safety and effectiveness in the treatment of unTBAD, unTBAD is still being predominantly managed conservatively with medical therapy, with a small proportion of patients being offered TEVAR.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The main scope of this review is to highlight the evidence in the literature of the demographic characteristics and associated co-morbidities of unTBAD patients undergoing TEVAR in order to produce a risk stratification system to achieve favourable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and EMBASE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple demographic characteristics and associated co-morbidities of unTBAD patients affecting TEVAR outcomes were identified, assessed, and investigated, including age, gender, race, genetics, medical conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes, and lifestyle factors such as smoking. Most factors were associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity, while others, such as race, were identified as being protective against those when it comes to TEVAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the favourable results yielded by TEVAR in unTBAD, there remains a grey area concerning its management. Thus, it is important to incorporate the demographics and co-morbidities of unTBAD patients' when into clinical judgement when assessing indications for TEVAR intervention to ensure optimum results can be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":35950,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923221099771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (unTBAD) comprises the estimated majority of type B aortic dissection (TBAD), presenting without any of the complications associated with complicated TBAD (coTBAD). Although first-line treatment for coTBAD is thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and despite the fact that TEVAR has proven its safety and effectiveness in the treatment of unTBAD, unTBAD is still being predominantly managed conservatively with medical therapy, with a small proportion of patients being offered TEVAR.

Aims: The main scope of this review is to highlight the evidence in the literature of the demographic characteristics and associated co-morbidities of unTBAD patients undergoing TEVAR in order to produce a risk stratification system to achieve favourable outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and EMBASE.

Results: Multiple demographic characteristics and associated co-morbidities of unTBAD patients affecting TEVAR outcomes were identified, assessed, and investigated, including age, gender, race, genetics, medical conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes, and lifestyle factors such as smoking. Most factors were associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity, while others, such as race, were identified as being protective against those when it comes to TEVAR.

Conclusion: Despite the favourable results yielded by TEVAR in unTBAD, there remains a grey area concerning its management. Thus, it is important to incorporate the demographics and co-morbidities of unTBAD patients' when into clinical judgement when assessing indications for TEVAR intervention to ensure optimum results can be achieved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性无并发症B型主动脉夹层行胸腔血管内主动脉修复术的人群风险分析。
背景:非复杂性B型主动脉夹层(unTBAD)占B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的大多数,没有任何与复杂性TBAD (coTBAD)相关的并发症。尽管coTBAD的一线治疗是胸椎血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR),尽管TEVAR已经证明其治疗unTBAD的安全性和有效性,但unTBAD仍主要采用保守治疗,只有一小部分患者接受TEVAR治疗。目的:本综述的主要范围是强调文献中关于接受TEVAR治疗的非tbad患者的人口统计学特征和相关合并症的证据,以便建立一个风险分层系统,以获得有利的结果。方法:利用PubMed、Ovid、Scopus、EMBASE等电子数据库进行综合文献检索。结果:确定、评估和调查了影响TEVAR结果的非tbad患者的多种人口统计学特征和相关合并症,包括年龄、性别、种族、遗传、医疗条件(如高血压和糖尿病)以及生活方式因素(如吸烟)。大多数因素与死亡率和发病率的增加有关,而其他因素,如种族,被认为对TEVAR有保护作用。结论:尽管TEVAR在unTBAD中取得了良好的结果,但其管理仍存在灰色地带。因此,在评估TEVAR干预的适应症时,将非tbad患者的人口统计学和合并症纳入临床判断,以确保获得最佳结果是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals is an international peer-reviewed journal pertaining to cardiovascular and thoracic medicine. Besides original clinical manuscripts, we welcome research reports, product reviews, reports of new techniques, and findings of special significance to Asia and the Pacific Rim. Case studies that have significant novel original observations, are instructive, include adequate methodological details and provide conclusions. Workshop proceedings, meetings and book reviews, letters to the editor, and meeting announcements are encouraged along with relevant articles from authors.
期刊最新文献
Enlarging the surgeon's mind in aortic stenosis. Accidental finding of ALCAPA in a child with severe mitral regurgitation: A case study. Coronary arteriovenous fistula originating from the left coronary artery and draining into the superior vena cava. Total arterial revascularization with RIMA-LIMA-Y configuration in patients with left subclavian artery stenosis. Outcomes of fenestration versus none in extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1