A Model of the Home Literacy Environment and Family Risk of Reading Difficulty in Relation to Children's Preschool Emergent Literacy.

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Learning Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1177/00222194231195623
Sara Esmaeeli
{"title":"A Model of the Home Literacy Environment and Family Risk of Reading Difficulty in Relation to Children's Preschool Emergent Literacy.","authors":"Sara Esmaeeli","doi":"10.1177/00222194231195623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study extends the research on the preschool <i>home literacy environment</i> (HLE) in the context of the family risk (FR) of reading disability (RD) by examining a multiple-deficit model of RD. A total of 1,171 six-year-old Norwegian children were assessed at school entry, the onset of formal reading instruction in Norway. Their parents completed a questionnaire regarding their own RD, education, and the HLE. The final sample after applying the inclusion criteria was 794 children and their parents. The findings suggest, first, that two HLE factors (access to print and reading-related activities) should be distinguished rather than treated as a single factor (\"exposure to print\") as the majority of previous studies have done. This finding suggests a three-factor HLE model that includes <i>parents' reading interests and habits</i>, <i>reading-related activities</i>, and <i>access to print</i>. Second, family risk of RD is related to some extent to the HLE, even after controlling for parents' education. Third, children's experiences in their home environments and their emergent literacy may not be independent of their family risk of RD. More importantly, this study highlights the potential protective role of the HLE, especially when there is a history of RD within the family. The reason is that the positive association between the HLE and children's code-related emergent literacy remains significant when controlling for family risk of RD (access to print → emergent literacy: 0.39 [0.01, 0.68], <i>p</i> < 0.01; reading-related activities → emergent literacy: 0.37 [0.02, 0.35], <i>p</i> < 0.01; parents' reading interests and habits → emergent literacy: 0.26 [0.001, 0.15], <i>p</i> < 0.01). This finding supports that children's emergent literacy can be improved via a modifiable, dynamic factor such as the HLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231195623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study extends the research on the preschool home literacy environment (HLE) in the context of the family risk (FR) of reading disability (RD) by examining a multiple-deficit model of RD. A total of 1,171 six-year-old Norwegian children were assessed at school entry, the onset of formal reading instruction in Norway. Their parents completed a questionnaire regarding their own RD, education, and the HLE. The final sample after applying the inclusion criteria was 794 children and their parents. The findings suggest, first, that two HLE factors (access to print and reading-related activities) should be distinguished rather than treated as a single factor ("exposure to print") as the majority of previous studies have done. This finding suggests a three-factor HLE model that includes parents' reading interests and habits, reading-related activities, and access to print. Second, family risk of RD is related to some extent to the HLE, even after controlling for parents' education. Third, children's experiences in their home environments and their emergent literacy may not be independent of their family risk of RD. More importantly, this study highlights the potential protective role of the HLE, especially when there is a history of RD within the family. The reason is that the positive association between the HLE and children's code-related emergent literacy remains significant when controlling for family risk of RD (access to print → emergent literacy: 0.39 [0.01, 0.68], p < 0.01; reading-related activities → emergent literacy: 0.37 [0.02, 0.35], p < 0.01; parents' reading interests and habits → emergent literacy: 0.26 [0.001, 0.15], p < 0.01). This finding supports that children's emergent literacy can be improved via a modifiable, dynamic factor such as the HLE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭识字环境和家庭阅读困难风险与儿童学前启蒙识字的关系模型》(A Model of the Home Literacy Environment and Family Risk of Reading Difficulties in Relation to Children's Preschool Emergent Literacy)。
本研究通过考察阅读障碍的多重缺陷模型,扩展了在阅读障碍的家庭风险(FR)背景下对学龄前家庭识字环境(HLE)的研究。共有 1171 名六岁的挪威儿童在入学时接受了评估,这也是挪威正式开始阅读教学的时间。他们的父母填写了一份有关其自身阅读障碍、教育和 HLE 的调查问卷。在应用了纳入标准后,最终的样本为 794 名儿童及其父母。研究结果表明,首先,应将两个 HLE 因素(接触印刷品和与阅读相关的活动)区分开来,而不是像之前的大多数研究那样将其视为一个单一因素("接触印刷品")。这一发现建议采用三因素 HLE 模型,包括父母的阅读兴趣和习惯、与阅读相关的活动以及接触印刷品的机会。其次,即使控制了父母的教育程度,家庭患阅读障碍症的风险在一定程度上也与 HLE 有关。第三,儿童在家庭环境中的经历和他们的启蒙读写能力可能与他们的家庭阅读障碍风险无关。更重要的是,本研究强调了家庭学习环境的潜在保护作用,尤其是当家庭中有阅读障碍病史时。这是因为,当控制了 RD 的家庭风险时,HLE 与儿童与代码相关的新兴读写能力之间的正相关仍然显著(接触印刷品 → 新兴读写能力:0.39 [0.01, 0.68],p < 0.01;与阅读相关的活动 → 新兴读写能力:0.37 [0.02, 0.35],p < 0.01;父母的阅读兴趣和习惯 → 新兴读写能力:0.26 [0.001, 0.15],p < 0.01)。这一发现证明,儿童的启蒙识字能力可以通过像 HLE 这样的可改变的动态因素得到提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
期刊最新文献
Derivational Morphology Training in French-Speaking 9- to 14- Year-Old Children and Adolescents With Developmental Dyslexia: Does It Improve Morphological Awareness, Reading, and Spelling Outcome Measures? Graph Out Loud: Pre-Service Teachers' Data Decisions and Interpretations of CBM Progress Graphs. What Environments Support Reading Growth Among Current Compared With Former Reading Intervention Recipients? A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Their Schools. Ongoing Teacher Support for Data-Based Individualization: A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis. The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Clarifying the Relationship Between Free Appropriate Public Education and Least Restrictive Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1