首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Learning Disabilities最新文献

英文 中文
The Role of Statistics Anxiety and Attitudes in Statistical Literacy Among Students With Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 统计焦虑和态度对学习障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍学生统计素养的影响
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261420168
Miriam Sarid, Anat Klemer, Carmit Gal, Chen Hanna Ryder
Statistical literacy is widely regarded as a core competency for academic achievement and informed decision-making across disciplines. However, many students experience elevated statistics anxiety and hold negative attitudes toward statistics, which can hinder their learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between students with and without learning disabilities (SLD) and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in statistics anxiety, attitudes toward statistics, and statistical literacy, and to examine the mediating role of attitudes in the relationship between statistics anxiety and statistical literacy. A total of 405 higher education students participated: 44 students with SLD/ADHD, 50 students with only-ADHD, and 311 without SLD/ADHD. Participants completed the Hebrew statistical anxiety rating scale and a statistical literacy assessment. Results showed that students with SLD/ADHD experienced higher levels of statistics anxiety and less favorable attitudes toward statistics compared to students without SLD/ADHD. Computational self-concept emerged as a significant mediator between test and class anxiety—a component of statistics anxiety—and statistical literacy for students with SLD/ADHD. The study highlights the importance of addressing both attitudinal and anxiety factors in statistics education for students with SLD/ADHD, as well as the need for targeted interventions to foster statistical literacy in higher education.
统计素养被广泛认为是学术成就和跨学科明智决策的核心能力。然而,许多学生经历了统计焦虑的加剧,对统计持消极态度,这可能会阻碍他们的学习成果。摘要本研究旨在探讨有学习障碍(SLD)和/或注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)学生在统计焦虑、统计态度和统计素养方面的差异,并探讨态度在统计焦虑和统计素养之间的中介作用。共有405名高等教育学生参与:44名患有特殊障碍/注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生,50名患有单纯注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生,311名没有特殊障碍/注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生。参与者完成了希伯来语统计焦虑评定量表和统计读写能力评估。结果显示,与正常学生相比,SLD/ADHD学生的统计焦虑水平更高,对统计的态度更不友好。计算自我概念在考试焦虑、课堂焦虑(统计焦虑的一个组成部分)和统计素养之间起着重要的中介作用。该研究强调了在统计教育中解决SLD/ADHD学生的态度和焦虑因素的重要性,以及在高等教育中进行有针对性的干预以培养统计素养的必要性。
{"title":"The Role of Statistics Anxiety and Attitudes in Statistical Literacy Among Students With Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder","authors":"Miriam Sarid, Anat Klemer, Carmit Gal, Chen Hanna Ryder","doi":"10.1177/00222194261420168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261420168","url":null,"abstract":"Statistical literacy is widely regarded as a core competency for academic achievement and informed decision-making across disciplines. However, many students experience elevated statistics anxiety and hold negative attitudes toward statistics, which can hinder their learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between students with and without learning disabilities (SLD) and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in statistics anxiety, attitudes toward statistics, and statistical literacy, and to examine the mediating role of attitudes in the relationship between statistics anxiety and statistical literacy. A total of 405 higher education students participated: 44 students with SLD/ADHD, 50 students with only-ADHD, and 311 without SLD/ADHD. Participants completed the Hebrew statistical anxiety rating scale and a statistical literacy assessment. Results showed that students with SLD/ADHD experienced higher levels of statistics anxiety and less favorable attitudes toward statistics compared to students without SLD/ADHD. Computational self-concept emerged as a significant mediator between test and class anxiety—a component of statistics anxiety—and statistical literacy for students with SLD/ADHD. The study highlights the importance of addressing both attitudinal and anxiety factors in statistics education for students with SLD/ADHD, as well as the need for targeted interventions to foster statistical literacy in higher education.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147507892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Fact Fluency Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties (MD). 数学困难学生数学事实流畅性干预的元分析。
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-03-06 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261424914
Grace P Douglas,Jonté A Myers,Kathleen K Mason,Sarah R Powell,Danielle O Lariviere
Mathematics fact fluency is essential for proficiency in advanced topics, such as algebra. However, many students in the United States, including those in elementary and secondary grades, experience mathematics difficulties (MD) and struggle to develop fluency with mathematics facts. We synthesized findings from 35 group-design studies, reporting 178 effect sizes (ESs), conducted between 1975 and June 2024, to evaluate the efficacy of fact fluency interventions and identify key malleable moderators of intervention outcomes. Results from a Robust Variance Estimation (RVE) model revealed an educationally meaningful average ES (g = 0.76), providing evidence of the overall efficacy of fact fluency interventions. However, the prediction interval (-0.60 to 2.12) indicated substantial heterogeneity in treatment effects, warranting further investigation. To explore this variability, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to examine the role of intervention dosage indicators (e.g., frequency) and alignment indicators (e.g., grade level) while accounting for study-level confounders (e.g., publication era). Significant moderators included two dosage indicators (i.e., grouping and total sessions) and two alignment indicators (i.e., operation focus and outcome measures). We discuss these results in relation to limitations, implications for future research, and classroom practice.
数学事实的流畅性对于熟练掌握高级课题(如代数)至关重要。然而,美国的许多学生,包括小学和中学的学生,都经历过数学困难(MD),并努力发展数学事实的流畅性。我们综合了1975年至2024年6月期间进行的35项组设计研究的结果,报告了178个效应量(ESs),以评估事实流畅性干预的有效性,并确定干预结果的关键可塑调节因子。稳健方差估计(RVE)模型的结果显示,平均ES具有教育意义(g = 0.76),为事实流畅性干预的总体效果提供了证据。然而,预测区间(-0.60至2.12)表明治疗效果存在显著异质性,值得进一步研究。为了探索这种可变性,我们进行了荟萃回归分析,以检查干预剂量指标(例如,频率)和校准指标(例如,年级水平)的作用,同时考虑研究水平混杂因素(例如,出版时代)。显著调节因子包括两个剂量指标(即分组和总疗程)和两个校准指标(即操作重点和结果测量)。我们将讨论这些结果的局限性、对未来研究的启示以及课堂实践。
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Fact Fluency Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties (MD).","authors":"Grace P Douglas,Jonté A Myers,Kathleen K Mason,Sarah R Powell,Danielle O Lariviere","doi":"10.1177/00222194261424914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261424914","url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics fact fluency is essential for proficiency in advanced topics, such as algebra. However, many students in the United States, including those in elementary and secondary grades, experience mathematics difficulties (MD) and struggle to develop fluency with mathematics facts. We synthesized findings from 35 group-design studies, reporting 178 effect sizes (ESs), conducted between 1975 and June 2024, to evaluate the efficacy of fact fluency interventions and identify key malleable moderators of intervention outcomes. Results from a Robust Variance Estimation (RVE) model revealed an educationally meaningful average ES (g = 0.76), providing evidence of the overall efficacy of fact fluency interventions. However, the prediction interval (-0.60 to 2.12) indicated substantial heterogeneity in treatment effects, warranting further investigation. To explore this variability, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to examine the role of intervention dosage indicators (e.g., frequency) and alignment indicators (e.g., grade level) while accounting for study-level confounders (e.g., publication era). Significant moderators included two dosage indicators (i.e., grouping and total sessions) and two alignment indicators (i.e., operation focus and outcome measures). We discuss these results in relation to limitations, implications for future research, and classroom practice.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"262 1","pages":"222194261424914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147359168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Synthesis of Mathematics Interventions for High School Students With Mathematics Difficulties. 高中数学困难学生数学干预综合研究。
IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251385204
S Blair Payne, Sarah R Powell, Erica C Fry

High school mathematics can have a direct impact on the academic, health, and financial outcomes of students. To understand how to better support students experiencing mathematics difficulty (MD) in Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12 (i.e., high school), we conducted a synthesis of 21 studies in which author teams investigated the efficacy of a mathematics intervention across a total sample of 197 students. Overall, 15 studies demonstrated positive outcomes, with four studies demonstrating no effects and two studies demonstrating mixed results. We identified several instructional strategies used across multiple studies: explicit instruction, use of technology, focus on vocabulary, use of representations, and word-problem instruction. In most studies, researchers used single case designs, and most of the mathematics content focused on early algebraic standards. As such, there is a need for more mathematics intervention research at the high school level.

高中数学可以对学生的学业、健康和财务结果产生直接影响。为了了解如何更好地支持9年级、10年级、11年级和12年级(即高中)的数学困难学生,我们综合了21项研究,其中作者团队调查了197名学生的数学干预效果。总体而言,15项研究显示出积极的结果,4项研究显示没有效果,2项研究显示结果好坏参半。我们确定了在多个研究中使用的几种教学策略:明确教学、使用技术、关注词汇、使用表征和单词问题教学。在大多数研究中,研究人员使用单一案例设计,大多数数学内容都集中在早期代数标准上。因此,需要在高中阶段进行更多的数学干预研究。
{"title":"A Synthesis of Mathematics Interventions for High School Students With Mathematics Difficulties.","authors":"S Blair Payne, Sarah R Powell, Erica C Fry","doi":"10.1177/00222194251385204","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194251385204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High school mathematics can have a direct impact on the academic, health, and financial outcomes of students. To understand how to better support students experiencing mathematics difficulty (MD) in Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12 (i.e., high school), we conducted a synthesis of 21 studies in which author teams investigated the efficacy of a mathematics intervention across a total sample of 197 students. Overall, 15 studies demonstrated positive outcomes, with four studies demonstrating no effects and two studies demonstrating mixed results. We identified several instructional strategies used across multiple studies: explicit instruction, use of technology, focus on vocabulary, use of representations, and word-problem instruction. In most studies, researchers used single case designs, and most of the mathematics content focused on early algebraic standards. As such, there is a need for more mathematics intervention research at the high school level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"75-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12906607/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Family Quality of Life of Children With Specific Learning Disabilities, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Their Co-Occurrence: A Cross-Sectional Study. 特殊学习障碍、注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的家庭生活质量及其共发:一项横断面研究。
IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251342202
Di Chao Liang, Kean Poon, Yen Na Yum

Research on Family Quality of Life (FQoL) has increasingly focused on the impact of learning disabilities on families. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of how Specific Learning Disabilities (SpLD) or Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity/Disorder (ADHD) affect executive function (EF) deficits in children and FQoL across different household income levels. The current study compared the FQoL ratings from caregivers of three groups of Hong Kong Chinese children with learning disabilities (SpLD n = 107; ADHD n = 43; SpLD & ADHD n = 67, no typically developing control group was included). Results revealed that group classification of learning disabilities was related to two domains of FQoL (family interaction and parenting) through the child's EF. Children with co-occurring SpLD and ADHD exhibit relatively stable EF deficits across income levels, maintaining higher EF deficits than those with SpLD alone and showing less variation than those with ADHD, who demonstrate a significant decrease in EF deficits at higher household income. Executive function deficits were associated with lower family interaction and parenting ratings across group and income levels. The findings enhance our understanding of FQoL among children with SpLD, ADHD, and their co-occurrence, highlighting the need for additional support for these families.

家庭生活质量(FQoL)的研究越来越关注学习障碍对家庭的影响。然而,对于特殊学习障碍(SpLD)或注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)如何影响不同家庭收入水平儿童的执行功能(EF)缺陷和家庭生活质量,目前还缺乏全面的了解。本研究比较了三组香港中文学习障碍儿童(SpLD n = 107;ADHD n = 43;SpLD和ADHD n = 67,不包括典型发展对照组)。结果表明,学习障碍的群体分类通过儿童的EF与家庭互动和父母教养两个领域的学习质量相关。同时患有SpLD和ADHD的儿童在收入水平上表现出相对稳定的EF赤字,比单独患有SpLD的儿童保持更高的EF赤字,比患有ADHD的儿童表现出更小的变化,后者在高家庭收入下表现出显著的EF赤字下降。执行功能缺陷与较低的家庭互动以及不同群体和收入水平的父母评价有关。研究结果增强了我们对SpLD、ADHD儿童及其共患儿童生活质量的理解,强调了对这些家庭提供额外支持的必要性。
{"title":"The Family Quality of Life of Children With Specific Learning Disabilities, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Their Co-Occurrence: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Di Chao Liang, Kean Poon, Yen Na Yum","doi":"10.1177/00222194251342202","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194251342202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on Family Quality of Life (FQoL) has increasingly focused on the impact of learning disabilities on families. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of how Specific Learning Disabilities (SpLD) or Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity/Disorder (ADHD) affect executive function (EF) deficits in children and FQoL across different household income levels. The current study compared the FQoL ratings from caregivers of three groups of Hong Kong Chinese children with learning disabilities (SpLD <i>n</i> = 107; ADHD <i>n</i> = 43; SpLD & ADHD <i>n</i> = 67, no typically developing control group was included). Results revealed that group classification of learning disabilities was related to two domains of FQoL (family interaction and parenting) through the child's EF. Children with co-occurring SpLD and ADHD exhibit relatively stable EF deficits across income levels, maintaining higher EF deficits than those with SpLD alone and showing less variation than those with ADHD, who demonstrate a significant decrease in EF deficits at higher household income. Executive function deficits were associated with lower family interaction and parenting ratings across group and income levels. The findings enhance our understanding of FQoL among children with SpLD, ADHD, and their co-occurrence, highlighting the need for additional support for these families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"119-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144143967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Specific Learning Difficulties: Disparities in Identification 特殊学习困难:识别差异
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261427006
Johny Daniel, Julian Elliott, Peter Tymms, Steve Strand
This study investigates disparities in the identification of specific learning difficulties (SpLD) in England. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models on National Pupil Database records for approximately 540,000 Year 6 students across 14,800 schools. Student-level predictors included academic performance in reading and math, gender, English as an additional language (EAL) status, mobility status, and individual economic deprivation indicator; school-level predictors included average school reading and math attainment, proportion of EAL students, and average deprivation. Substantial between-school variation in SpLD identification was observed. After controlling for attainment and student background characteristics, EAL students had markedly lower odds of identification. Similarly, female students were less likely to be identified for SpLD than their male peers. Furthermore, higher average school-level deprivation predicted reduced identification odds. These findings highlight that systemic and contextual factors, alongside individual learning profiles, shape SpLD identification and raise concerns about equitable access to assessment and support for a diverse group of learners.
本研究调查了英国在识别特殊学习困难(SpLD)方面的差异。我们估计了国家学生数据库中14,800所学校约54万名六年级学生的多水平逻辑回归模型。学生水平的预测指标包括阅读和数学成绩、性别、英语作为附加语言(EAL)状况、流动性状况和个人经济剥夺指标;学校水平的预测因子包括平均学校阅读和数学成绩、EAL学生比例和平均贫困。在SpLD鉴定上观察到学校间的显著差异。在控制成绩和学生背景特征后,EAL学生的认同率明显较低。同样,女学生比男学生更不容易被确诊为SpLD。此外,较高的平均学校水平剥夺预示着较低的识别几率。这些研究结果强调,系统和背景因素以及个人学习概况影响了对特殊学习障碍的识别,并引起了对不同学习者群体公平获得评估和支持的关注。
{"title":"Specific Learning Difficulties: Disparities in Identification","authors":"Johny Daniel, Julian Elliott, Peter Tymms, Steve Strand","doi":"10.1177/00222194261427006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261427006","url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates disparities in the identification of specific learning difficulties (SpLD) in England. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models on National Pupil Database records for approximately 540,000 Year 6 students across 14,800 schools. Student-level predictors included academic performance in reading and math, gender, English as an additional language (EAL) status, mobility status, and individual economic deprivation indicator; school-level predictors included average school reading and math attainment, proportion of EAL students, and average deprivation. Substantial between-school variation in SpLD identification was observed. After controlling for attainment and student background characteristics, EAL students had markedly lower odds of identification. Similarly, female students were less likely to be identified for SpLD than their male peers. Furthermore, higher average school-level deprivation predicted reduced identification odds. These findings highlight that systemic and contextual factors, alongside individual learning profiles, shape SpLD identification and raise concerns about equitable access to assessment and support for a diverse group of learners.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147287484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
University Students With Specific Learning Disabilities: Do Soft Skills and Study-Related Factors Make a Difference to Their Academic Outcomes? 有特殊学习障碍的大学生:软技能和学习相关因素对他们的学习成绩有影响吗?
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261417592
Gerardo Pellegrino, Tommaso Feraco, Francesca De Vita, Maria Grazia Martino, Maria Cristina Matteucci, Lorena Montesano, Maria Chiara Passolunghi, Anna Maria Re, Barbara Sini, Carla Tinti, Antonella Valenti, Chiara Meneghetti, Barbara Carretti
Understanding the role of individual factors associated with positive academic outcomes is fundamental to providing effective support for students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) throughout their academic careers. The present study aimed to investigate group differences between students with and without SLDs and to examine the relationships between study-related factors, social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) skills, and student outcomes (achievement, academic and life satisfaction, and burnout) in a sample of 752 university students (133 male; M age = 22.28 years, SD age = 5.35; 125 with SLDs). The results of the group comparisons showed that students with SLDs reported lower scores in academic self-efficacy, SRL strategies, and self-management skills. This finding suggests that their difficulties may extend beyond the academic domain. Furthermore, we ran a multivariate regression model including study-related factors and SEB skills as independent variables and student outcomes as dependent variables. The results showed that the associations of study-related factors and SEB skills with student outcomes were comparable between students with and without SLDs, although cooperation skills were significantly associated with academic burnout in students without SLDs, but not in students with SLDs. These findings have the potential to inform the development of student-centered practice and policy.
了解与积极学业成绩相关的个体因素的作用是在整个学习生涯中为有特殊学习障碍的学生提供有效支持的基础。本研究旨在探讨学习相关因素、社会、情感和行为(SEB)技能与学生成绩(学业成就、学业和生活满意度、倦怠)之间的关系。研究对象为752名大学生,其中男133名,男年龄22.28岁,SD年龄5.35岁,有sld者125名。组间比较结果显示,学业障碍学生在学业自我效能、自我学习策略和自我管理技能方面得分较低。这一发现表明,他们的困难可能超出了学术领域。以学习相关因素和SEB技能为自变量,以学生成绩为因变量,建立多元回归模型。结果显示,学习相关因素和SEB技能对学业倦怠的影响在有和没有特殊学习障碍的学生之间具有可对比性,但在没有特殊学习障碍的学生中,合作技能对学业倦怠的影响显著,而在有特殊学习障碍的学生中则不显著。这些发现有可能为以学生为中心的实践和政策的发展提供信息。
{"title":"University Students With Specific Learning Disabilities: Do Soft Skills and Study-Related Factors Make a Difference to Their Academic Outcomes?","authors":"Gerardo Pellegrino, Tommaso Feraco, Francesca De Vita, Maria Grazia Martino, Maria Cristina Matteucci, Lorena Montesano, Maria Chiara Passolunghi, Anna Maria Re, Barbara Sini, Carla Tinti, Antonella Valenti, Chiara Meneghetti, Barbara Carretti","doi":"10.1177/00222194261417592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261417592","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the role of individual factors associated with positive academic outcomes is fundamental to providing effective support for students with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) throughout their academic careers. The present study aimed to investigate group differences between students with and without SLDs and to examine the relationships between study-related factors, social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) skills, and student outcomes (achievement, academic and life satisfaction, and burnout) in a sample of 752 university students (133 male; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\"> M <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> </jats:italic> = 22.28 years, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\"> SD <jats:sub>age</jats:sub> </jats:italic> = 5.35; 125 with SLDs). The results of the group comparisons showed that students with SLDs reported lower scores in academic self-efficacy, SRL strategies, and self-management skills. This finding suggests that their difficulties may extend beyond the academic domain. Furthermore, we ran a multivariate regression model including study-related factors and SEB skills as independent variables and student outcomes as dependent variables. The results showed that the associations of study-related factors and SEB skills with student outcomes were comparable between students with and without SLDs, although cooperation skills were significantly associated with academic burnout in students without SLDs, but not in students with SLDs. These findings have the potential to inform the development of student-centered practice and policy.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146160365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Pilot Study Examining Elements to Improve Generalized Word Reading Skills for Students With Significant Word Reading Difficulties. 一项探讨提高有显著阅读困难学生泛化阅读能力要素的初步研究。
IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261417589
Nathan H Clemens, Alexis N Boucher, Sharon Vaughn, Marcia A Barnes, Greg Roberts, Anna-Mari Fall, J E Miller, Nancy Scammacca, Megan Osbon

Students in grades 2 through 4 with significant word reading difficulties were randomly assigned to one of two 10-week interventions. In the Dual Treatment condition, decoding instruction emphasized regularity in spelling-sound correspondence, sound-by-sound decoding, and separately taught high-frequency words on a whole-word basis. In the Integrated condition, decoding instruction interleaved regularity and variability in spelling-sound correspondence, targeted larger letter units, and aligned high-frequency word instruction with decoding. At posttest, statistically significant differences favored the Integrated condition on standardized word reading efficiency (g = 0.37), silent word identification fluency (g = 0.41), and an intervention-aligned list of words not targeted in either condition (g = 0.26). Although not statistically significant, effect sizes also favored the Integrated condition on standardized sentence reading efficiency (g = 0.25), intervention-aligned letter-sound correspondence (g = 0.24), and other word lists taught or not taught in both conditions (gs = 0.12 to 0.21). A nonstatistically significant effect favored the Dual Treatment condition on intervention-aligned correct letter sequences spelling (g = -0.19), and null effects were observed on a standardized oral reading fluency (g = 0.04) and intervention-aligned whole word spelling (g = 0.02). Supported exposure to greater variability in spelling-sound correspondence may improve generalized word reading skills.

二年级到四年级有明显单词阅读困难的学生被随机分配到两个为期10周的干预中。在“双重处理”条件下,解码教学强调拼音对应、逐音解码的规律性,并在整个单词的基础上单独教授高频单词。在整合状态下,解码指令将拼音对应的规律性和可变性交织在一起,针对较大的字母单元,并将高频单词指令与解码对齐。在后测中,综合条件在标准化单词阅读效率(g = 0.37)、无声单词识别流畅性(g = 0.41)和两种条件下未针对的干预对齐单词列表(g = 0.26)方面的差异具有统计学意义。虽然没有统计学上的显著差异,但在标准化句子阅读效率(g = 0.25)、与干预相关的字母-声音对应(g = 0.24)以及在两种条件下教授或不教授的其他单词列表(gs = 0.12至0.21)方面,效应量也有利于综合条件。双重治疗条件对干预组的正确字母序列拼写有显著影响(g = -0.19),对标准化口语阅读流畅性(g = 0.04)和干预组的全词拼写(g = 0.02)无显著影响。支持接触更多的拼写-声音对应的可变性可能提高一般的单词阅读技能。
{"title":"A Pilot Study Examining Elements to Improve Generalized Word Reading Skills for Students With Significant Word Reading Difficulties.","authors":"Nathan H Clemens, Alexis N Boucher, Sharon Vaughn, Marcia A Barnes, Greg Roberts, Anna-Mari Fall, J E Miller, Nancy Scammacca, Megan Osbon","doi":"10.1177/00222194261417589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261417589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Students in grades 2 through 4 with significant word reading difficulties were randomly assigned to one of two 10-week interventions. In the <i>Dual Treatment</i> condition, decoding instruction emphasized regularity in spelling-sound correspondence, sound-by-sound decoding, and separately taught high-frequency words on a whole-word basis. In the <i>Integrated</i> condition, decoding instruction interleaved regularity and variability in spelling-sound correspondence, targeted larger letter units, and aligned high-frequency word instruction with decoding. At posttest, statistically significant differences favored the Integrated condition on standardized word reading efficiency (<i>g</i> = 0.37), silent word identification fluency (<i>g</i> = 0.41), and an intervention-aligned list of words not targeted in either condition (<i>g</i> = 0.26). Although not statistically significant, effect sizes also favored the Integrated condition on standardized sentence reading efficiency (<i>g</i> = 0.25), intervention-aligned letter-sound correspondence (<i>g</i> = 0.24), and other word lists taught or not taught in both conditions (<i>g</i>s = 0.12 to 0.21). A nonstatistically significant effect favored the Dual Treatment condition on intervention-aligned correct letter sequences spelling (<i>g</i> = -0.19), and null effects were observed on a standardized oral reading fluency (<i>g</i> = 0.04) and intervention-aligned whole word spelling (<i>g</i> = 0.02). Supported exposure to greater variability in spelling-sound correspondence may improve generalized word reading skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194261417589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Executive Function and Writing Performance Among Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties: The Mediating Role of Visual-Motor Integration. 写作困难小学生的执行功能与写作表现:视觉-运动整合的中介作用。
IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/00222194261417608
Rui Dong, Li Yin, Kun Zheng, Keran Chen

Executive function is critical for writing, yet its role in children with writing difficulties (WD) remains underexplored. This study examines differences in three executive-function subcomponents (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) between children with and without WD, and their effects on spelling and sentence-writing abilities, mediated by visual-motor integration. The focus on Chinese children addresses a critical gap in the predominantly Western-alphabetic writing difficulties literature. A total of 244 Chinese primary school students (122 with WD, 122 without WD) were assessed. Children with WD demonstrated significantly lower accuracy and longer reaction times in executive function tasks as well as lower visual-motor integration scores, compared with their peers without WD. Structural equation modeling revealed that working memory and inhibitory control indirectly predicted writing performance through visual-motor integration, while cognitive flexibility had no significant effect. These findings suggest that executive function impairments, particularly in working memory and inhibitory control, may contribute to WD through their influence on visual-motor integration. The study highlights the importance of addressing both executive function and visual-motor integration in interventions targeting children with WD.

执行功能对写作至关重要,但它在有写作困难的儿童中的作用仍未得到充分研究。本研究考察了三种执行功能成分(工作记忆、抑制控制和认知灵活性)在有和没有WD的儿童之间的差异,以及它们在视觉-运动整合介导下对拼写和句子写作能力的影响。对中国儿童的关注解决了以西方字母为主的书写困难文学的一个关键缺口。共对244名中国小学生进行问卷调查,其中有WD者122人,无WD者122人。与没有WD的同龄人相比,患有WD的儿童在执行功能任务中表现出明显较低的准确性和较长的反应时间,以及较低的视觉-运动整合得分。结构方程模型显示,工作记忆和抑制控制通过视觉-运动整合间接预测写作成绩,而认知灵活性对写作成绩无显著影响。这些发现表明,执行功能障碍,特别是在工作记忆和抑制控制方面,可能通过影响视觉-运动整合而导致WD。该研究强调了在针对WD儿童的干预措施中解决执行功能和视觉运动整合的重要性。
{"title":"Executive Function and Writing Performance Among Primary School Students With Writing Difficulties: The Mediating Role of Visual-Motor Integration.","authors":"Rui Dong, Li Yin, Kun Zheng, Keran Chen","doi":"10.1177/00222194261417608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194261417608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive function is critical for writing, yet its role in children with writing difficulties (WD) remains underexplored. This study examines differences in three executive-function subcomponents (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) between children with and without WD, and their effects on spelling and sentence-writing abilities, mediated by visual-motor integration. The focus on Chinese children addresses a critical gap in the predominantly Western-alphabetic writing difficulties literature. A total of 244 Chinese primary school students (122 with WD, 122 without WD) were assessed. Children with WD demonstrated significantly lower accuracy and longer reaction times in executive function tasks as well as lower visual-motor integration scores, compared with their peers without WD. Structural equation modeling revealed that working memory and inhibitory control indirectly predicted writing performance through visual-motor integration, while cognitive flexibility had no significant effect. These findings suggest that executive function impairments, particularly in working memory and inhibitory control, may contribute to WD through their influence on visual-motor integration. The study highlights the importance of addressing both executive function and visual-motor integration in interventions targeting children with WD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"222194261417608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effects of Repeated Reading Interventions on the Oral Reading Fluency of Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties and Disabilities 重复阅读干预对阅读障碍中学生口语阅读流畅性的影响
IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251404534
Kristie Calvin, Lindsay Ellis Lee, Christy Austin, Stephanie Gouge, Angela Watson
Fluency is a multidimensional construct that requires automaticity with foundational skills. Fluency is not an end in itself but serves as a bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. However, many secondary students struggle with proficient reading and fail to attain the most functional levels of literacy, even after receiving intensive reading interventions. The current study investigated the effects of repeated reading interventions on the oral reading fluency of adolescents at risk for and with reading disabilities. Sixty-eight students in Grades 6 through 8 (35 female, 33 male) were taught by 11 teachers and participated in either Repeated Reading Plus or Silent Repeated Reading . Hierarchical residual change regressions were conducted to evaluate the main effect and interaction effects of Repeated Reading Plus and Silent Repeated Reading on oral reading fluency (words correct per minute). Grade level and special education status were included as covariates. Multilevel analyses were used to account for between-teacher variability. Results indicate repeated reading interventions that include previewing multisyllabic words, fluent modeling of connected text, repeated partner reading, and answering comprehension questions may support the oral reading fluency of middle school students with reading difficulties and disabilities.
流利是一个多维度的结构,需要具备基本技能的自动性。流利本身并不是目的,而是在解码和阅读理解之间架起一座桥梁。然而,即使在接受强化阅读干预后,许多中学生仍难以熟练阅读,未能达到最实用的读写水平。本研究旨在探讨重复阅读干预对有阅读障碍的青少年口语阅读流畅性的影响。6至8年级的68名学生(女35名,男33名)由11位老师授课,他们参加了“重复阅读+”和“沉默重复阅读”。采用分层残差变化回归法评价重复阅读+和无声重复阅读对口语阅读流畅性(每分钟正确字数)的主效应和交互效应。包括年级水平和特殊教育状况作为协变量。多水平分析用于解释教师之间的差异。结果表明,包括多音节单词预习、连贯文本流畅建模、重复同伴阅读和回答理解问题在内的重复阅读干预措施可以支持阅读困难和阅读障碍中学生的口语阅读流畅性。
{"title":"The Effects of Repeated Reading Interventions on the Oral Reading Fluency of Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties and Disabilities","authors":"Kristie Calvin, Lindsay Ellis Lee, Christy Austin, Stephanie Gouge, Angela Watson","doi":"10.1177/00222194251404534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251404534","url":null,"abstract":"Fluency is a multidimensional construct that requires automaticity with foundational skills. Fluency is not an end in itself but serves as a bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. However, many secondary students struggle with proficient reading and fail to attain the most functional levels of literacy, even after receiving intensive reading interventions. The current study investigated the effects of repeated reading interventions on the oral reading fluency of adolescents at risk for and with reading disabilities. Sixty-eight students in Grades 6 through 8 (35 female, 33 male) were taught by 11 teachers and participated in either <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Repeated Reading Plus</jats:italic> or <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Silent Repeated Reading</jats:italic> . Hierarchical residual change regressions were conducted to evaluate the main effect and interaction effects of <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Repeated Reading Plus</jats:italic> and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Silent Repeated Reading</jats:italic> on oral reading fluency (words correct per minute). Grade level and special education status were included as covariates. Multilevel analyses were used to account for between-teacher variability. Results indicate repeated reading interventions that include previewing multisyllabic words, fluent modeling of connected text, repeated partner reading, and answering comprehension questions may support the oral reading fluency of middle school students with reading difficulties and disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145920178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Morphology and Sentence Context in Word Processing for Adults With Low Literacy. 词法和句子语境在成人低识字率文字处理中的作用。
IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/00222194251315198
Kathryn A Tremblay, Katja McBane, Katherine S Binder

Both vocabulary skill and morphological complexity, or whether words can be broken down into root words and affixes, have a significant impact on word processing for adults with low literacy. We investigated the influence of word-level variables of morphological complexity and root word frequency, and the sentence-level variable of context strength, on word processing in adults with low literacy, who differed on levels of vocabulary depth skills, which was a participant-level variable. Our findings demonstrate that morphological complexity, root word frequency, and context strength are all related to how adult learners process words while reading, but their effects are dependent on participants' vocabulary depth. Participants with higher levels of vocabulary depth were able to more quickly process morphologically complex words and make better use of supportive sentence context as compared to individuals with lower levels of vocabulary depth. These findings suggest that both morphological complexity and vocabulary depth are important for word processing and reading comprehension in adults with low literacy.

词汇技能和词形复杂性,或者单词是否可以被分解成词根和词缀,对低读写能力的成年人的文字处理有重要影响。本文研究了词形复杂性和词根词频这两个词级变量和语境强度这两个句子级变量对词汇深度技能水平不同的低读写成人词汇处理的影响。我们的研究结果表明,词形复杂性、词根频率和语境强度都与成人学习者在阅读时如何处理单词有关,但它们的影响取决于参与者的词汇深度。与词汇深度较低的人相比,词汇深度较高的参与者能够更快地处理词形复杂的单词,并更好地利用支持句上下文。这些发现表明,词形复杂性和词汇深度对低读写能力成人的文字处理和阅读理解都很重要。
{"title":"The Role of Morphology and Sentence Context in Word Processing for Adults With Low Literacy.","authors":"Kathryn A Tremblay, Katja McBane, Katherine S Binder","doi":"10.1177/00222194251315198","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00222194251315198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both vocabulary skill and morphological complexity, or whether words can be broken down into root words and affixes, have a significant impact on word processing for adults with low literacy. We investigated the influence of word-level variables of morphological complexity and root word frequency, and the sentence-level variable of context strength, on word processing in adults with low literacy, who differed on levels of vocabulary depth skills, which was a participant-level variable. Our findings demonstrate that morphological complexity, root word frequency, and context strength are all related to how adult learners process words while reading, but their effects are dependent on participants' vocabulary depth. Participants with higher levels of vocabulary depth were able to more quickly process morphologically complex words and make better use of supportive sentence context as compared to individuals with lower levels of vocabulary depth. These findings suggest that both morphological complexity and vocabulary depth are important for word processing and reading comprehension in adults with low literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"55-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143460201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Learning Disabilities
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1