Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000569
Hanna Choi, Byungsun Park
{"title":"Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.","authors":"Hanna Choi,&nbsp;Byungsun Park","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family health significantly affects society and the country. Health problems have been identified as the most important cause of family anxiety and conflict in South Korea. Because valid instruments to measure this concept are limited, using the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness scale may provide precious insight into family health and nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to translate and validate the Korean version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness (K-ASF-E) scale. This scale was developed based on the framework of systemic organization for assessment and intervention use in the context of family nursing in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological approach was used to verify the validity and reliability of the K-ASF-E. To determine validity, we first invited four experts to evaluate content validity. Next, we collected data from 1,028 participants using stratified random sampling that considered the background of each participant in terms of region, age, and gender. On the basis of the collected data, we determined the construct validity of the scale using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, we used Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient analyses to assess scale reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The K-ASF-E showed item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index values of 1.00, as assessed by four experts. Using the principal component analysis method with varimax rotation, the exploratory factor analysis verified the validity of a K-ASF-E scale comprising four dimensions and 20 items, including system maintenance (seven items), system change (four items), coherence (six items), and individuation (three items). For confirmatory factor analysis, the fit indices of the factor structure of K-ASF-E indicate appropriate model fitness. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the subfactors centered on the target were .59-.86, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (range) was .56-.85.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The K-ASF-E scale is the first attempt to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool for family effectiveness in South Korea. Initial testing was validated using a large number of stratified randomized clusters. The K-ASF-E scale accurately measures family effectiveness and may be used for family-related research, intervention, and training programs in community and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"e290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family health significantly affects society and the country. Health problems have been identified as the most important cause of family anxiety and conflict in South Korea. Because valid instruments to measure this concept are limited, using the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness scale may provide precious insight into family health and nursing practice.

Purpose: This study was designed to translate and validate the Korean version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness (K-ASF-E) scale. This scale was developed based on the framework of systemic organization for assessment and intervention use in the context of family nursing in South Korea.

Methods: A methodological approach was used to verify the validity and reliability of the K-ASF-E. To determine validity, we first invited four experts to evaluate content validity. Next, we collected data from 1,028 participants using stratified random sampling that considered the background of each participant in terms of region, age, and gender. On the basis of the collected data, we determined the construct validity of the scale using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, we used Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient analyses to assess scale reliability.

Results: The K-ASF-E showed item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index values of 1.00, as assessed by four experts. Using the principal component analysis method with varimax rotation, the exploratory factor analysis verified the validity of a K-ASF-E scale comprising four dimensions and 20 items, including system maintenance (seven items), system change (four items), coherence (six items), and individuation (three items). For confirmatory factor analysis, the fit indices of the factor structure of K-ASF-E indicate appropriate model fitness. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the subfactors centered on the target were .59-.86, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (range) was .56-.85.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The K-ASF-E scale is the first attempt to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool for family effectiveness in South Korea. Initial testing was validated using a large number of stratified randomized clusters. The K-ASF-E scale accurately measures family effectiveness and may be used for family-related research, intervention, and training programs in community and clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国版家庭有效性策略评估量表的验证。
背景:家庭健康对社会和国家产生重大影响。健康问题已被确定为韩国家庭焦虑和冲突的最重要原因。由于衡量这一概念的有效工具有限,使用家庭策略有效性评估量表可以为家庭健康和护理实践提供宝贵的见解。目的:本研究旨在翻译和验证韩国版的家庭有效性策略评估(K-ASF-E)量表。该量表是基于韩国家庭护理评估和干预使用的系统组织框架开发的。方法:采用方法学方法验证K-ASF-E的有效性和可靠性。为了确定有效性,我们首先邀请了四位专家来评估内容的有效性。接下来,我们使用分层随机抽样从1028名参与者中收集数据,考虑了每个参与者的地区、年龄和性别背景。在收集数据的基础上,我们使用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来确定量表的结构有效性。最后,我们使用Cronbachα和组内相关系数分析来评估量表的可靠性。结果:经四位专家评估,K-ASF-E的项目级内容有效性指数和量表级内容有效度指数均为1.00。采用方差最大旋转的主成分分析方法,探索性因素分析验证了K-ASF-E量表的有效性,该量表包括四个维度和20个项目,包括系统维护(7个项目)、系统更改(4个项目),连贯性(6个项目)和个性化(3个项目)。对于验证性因子分析,K-ASF-E因子结构的拟合指数表明了适当的模型拟合度。以目标为中心的每个亚因素的Cronbachα系数为.59-.86,组内相关系数(范围)为.56-.85。结论/实践意义:K-ASF-E量表是韩国首次尝试开发可靠有效的家庭有效性测量工具。使用大量分层随机聚类对初始测试进行了验证。K-ASF-E量表准确测量了家庭有效性,可用于社区和临床环境中的家庭相关研究、干预和培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1