Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1103320
Zhen Yuan, Hao Cui, Shuyuan Wang, Wenquan Liang, Bo Cao, Liqiang Song, Guibin Liu, Jun Huang, Lin Chen, Bo Wei
{"title":"Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhen Yuan,&nbsp;Hao Cui,&nbsp;Shuyuan Wang,&nbsp;Wenquan Liang,&nbsp;Bo Cao,&nbsp;Liqiang Song,&nbsp;Guibin Liu,&nbsp;Jun Huang,&nbsp;Lin Chen,&nbsp;Bo Wei","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2023.1103320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising prospects in locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) immunotherapy, but their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of integrating programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of GC/GEJC treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and main oncology conference databases were systematically searched up to 19 November 2022, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus NACT were included. The main outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 753 patients from 20 prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled pCR and MPR rates from studies reporting were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1%-25.5%] and 44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of total TRAEs was 89.1% (95% CI, 82.7%-94.3%), and the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 TRAEs was 34.4% (95% CI, 17.8%-66.5%). The pooled R0 resection rate was reported to be 98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%). Subgroup analysis has not found significant differences in efficacy and safety among different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, the efficacy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥1) was comparable with that in the entire study population [pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05); MPR, 48.6% vs. 43.7% (p > 0.05)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with NACT for locally advanced GC/GEJC were well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages. The integration of ICIs into NACT has shown the potential for application in any PD-L1 expression population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1103320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1103320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising prospects in locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) immunotherapy, but their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of integrating programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of GC/GEJC treatment.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and main oncology conference databases were systematically searched up to 19 November 2022, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus NACT were included. The main outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results: A total of 753 patients from 20 prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled pCR and MPR rates from studies reporting were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1%-25.5%] and 44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of total TRAEs was 89.1% (95% CI, 82.7%-94.3%), and the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 TRAEs was 34.4% (95% CI, 17.8%-66.5%). The pooled R0 resection rate was reported to be 98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%). Subgroup analysis has not found significant differences in efficacy and safety among different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, the efficacy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥1) was comparable with that in the entire study population [pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05); MPR, 48.6% vs. 43.7% (p > 0.05)].

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with NACT for locally advanced GC/GEJC were well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages. The integration of ICIs into NACT has shown the potential for application in any PD-L1 expression population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期可切除的胃或胃食管交界处腺癌:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在局部晚期、可切除的胃或胃食管交界处腺癌(GC/GEJC)免疫治疗中显示出良好的前景,但其在新辅助治疗中的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估将程序性细胞死亡1 (PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)抑制剂整合到GC/GEJC治疗的新辅助化疗(NACT)中的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索截至2022年11月19日的PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov和主要肿瘤学会议数据库,纳入评估PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合NACT疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(rct)和队列研究。主要结果为病理完全缓解(pCR)、主要病理缓解(MPR)、R0切除率和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。结果:来自20项前瞻性研究的753例患者被纳入本荟萃分析。报告研究的聚合pCR和MPR率分别为21.7%[95%可信区间(CI), 18.1%-25.5%]和44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%)。总trae的合并发病率为89.1% (95% CI, 82.7% ~ 94.3%), 3 ~ 4级trae的合并发病率为34.4% (95% CI, 17.8% ~ 66.5%)。合并R0切除率为98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%)。亚组分析未发现不同PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的疗效和安全性有显著差异。此外,PD-L1阳性表达(联合阳性评分≥1)患者的疗效与整个研究人群相当[pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05);MPR分别为48.6%和43.7% (p > 0.05)。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合NACT治疗局部晚期GC/GEJC耐受性良好,可能具有治疗优势。将ICIs整合到NACT中已显示出在任何PD-L1表达人群中应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
Analysis on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with or without bevacizumab after CRS+HIPEC in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a single-center retrospective study. Colorectal cancer as a complex adaptive system: integrating the hallmarks of cancer with complexity theory. Studies on the functionality of the TC-NER ERCC6-M1097V protein variant frequently found in Louisiana patients with PCa upon UV damage. Association of B7H3 with HIF-1α nuclear expression indicates poor prognosis and therapeutic potential in gastric cancer. Case Report: Anlotinib combined with radiotherapy achieves sustained disease control in advanced malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1