Donor sex and donor-recipient sex disparity do not affect hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living donor liver transplantation.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.133
Rak Kyun Oh, Shin Hwang, Gi-Won Song, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Young-In Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang
{"title":"Donor sex and donor-recipient sex disparity do not affect hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living donor liver transplantation.","authors":"Rak Kyun Oh,&nbsp;Shin Hwang,&nbsp;Gi-Won Song,&nbsp;Chul-Soo Ahn,&nbsp;Deok-Bog Moon,&nbsp;Tae-Yong Ha,&nbsp;Dong-Hwan Jung,&nbsp;Gil-Chun Park,&nbsp;Young-In Yoon,&nbsp;Woo-Hyoung Kang","doi":"10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies have yielded contradictory results on whether donor sex and donor-recipient sex disparity affect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The present study assessed whether donor sex or donor-recipient sex disparity affects HCC recurrence after LDLT at a high-volume center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 772 HCC patients who underwent LDLT between January 2006 and December 2015 at Asan Medical Center. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the sex of the donor and recipient: male-to-male (n = 490, 63.5%), male-to-female (n = 75, 9.7%), female-to-male (n = 170, 22.0%), and female-to-female (n = 37, 4.8%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.372) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.591) did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. DFS also did not differ significantly between LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.792) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.084). After patient matching with an α-FP/des-γ-carboxy prothrombin/tumor volume score cutoff of 5logs, donor-recipient sex disparity did not significantly affect DFS (P = 0.598) or OS (P = 0.777). There were also no differences in DFS in matched LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.312) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.374).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither donor sex nor donor-recipient sex disparity significantly affected posttransplant HCC recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/01/astr-105-133.PMC10485355.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have yielded contradictory results on whether donor sex and donor-recipient sex disparity affect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The present study assessed whether donor sex or donor-recipient sex disparity affects HCC recurrence after LDLT at a high-volume center.

Methods: This study included 772 HCC patients who underwent LDLT between January 2006 and December 2015 at Asan Medical Center. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the sex of the donor and recipient: male-to-male (n = 490, 63.5%), male-to-female (n = 75, 9.7%), female-to-male (n = 170, 22.0%), and female-to-female (n = 37, 4.8%).

Results: Disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.372) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.591) did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. DFS also did not differ significantly between LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.792) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.084). After patient matching with an α-FP/des-γ-carboxy prothrombin/tumor volume score cutoff of 5logs, donor-recipient sex disparity did not significantly affect DFS (P = 0.598) or OS (P = 0.777). There were also no differences in DFS in matched LDLT recipients with male and female donors (P = 0.312) or between male and female recipients (P = 0.374).

Conclusion: Neither donor sex nor donor-recipient sex disparity significantly affected posttransplant HCC recurrence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供体性别和供体-受体性别差异不影响肝移植术后肝细胞癌复发。
目的:关于供体性别和供体-受体性别差异是否影响活体肝移植(LDLT)后肝细胞癌(HCC)复发的研究结果相互矛盾。本研究评估了供体性别或供体-受体性别差异是否影响大容量中心LDLT术后HCC复发。方法:本研究纳入了2006年1月至2015年12月在峨山医疗中心接受LDLT治疗的772例HCC患者。根据供体和受体的性别将患者分为4组:男对男(n = 490, 63.5%)、男对女(n = 75, 9.7%)、女对男(n = 170, 22.0%)、女对女(n = 37, 4.8%)。结果:无病生存期;P = 0.372)和总生存期(OS;P = 0.591), 4组间差异无统计学意义。男性和女性LDLT受体之间的DFS也没有显著差异(P = 0.792),男性和女性受体之间的DFS也没有显著差异(P = 0.084)。患者匹配α-FP/des-γ-羧基凝血酶原/肿瘤体积评分5log后,供体-受体性别差异对DFS (P = 0.598)和OS (P = 0.777)无显著影响。在匹配的LDLT受体中,男性和女性供者的DFS也没有差异(P = 0.312),男性和女性供者之间的DFS也没有差异(P = 0.374)。结论:供体性别和供体-受体性别差异对肝细胞癌移植后复发均无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients. Mortality and associated factors among patients who underwent liver transplantation in South Korea from 2017 to 2021: a retrospective observational study. Outcomes in emergency surgery following the implementation of an acute care surgery model: a retrospective observational study. Primary tumor sidedness is not prognostic factor in resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a retrospective observational cohort study. The efficacy of exosomes from human chemically derived hepatic progenitors in liver damage alleviation: a preclinical experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1