Development and Evaluation of the Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for Health Care Settings.

Molly McNett, Penelope F Gorsuch, Lynn Gallagher-Ford, Bindu Thomas, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Sharon Tucker
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of the Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for Health Care Settings.","authors":"Molly McNett,&nbsp;Penelope F Gorsuch,&nbsp;Lynn Gallagher-Ford,&nbsp;Bindu Thomas,&nbsp;Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,&nbsp;Sharon Tucker","doi":"10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into health care is often the most difficult stage in the change process. Despite major advances in implementation science and quality improvement, a persistent 13- to 15-year research-to-practice gap remains. Nurse leaders may benefit from tools to support implementation that are based on scientific evidence and can be readily integrated into complex health care settings. This article describes development and evaluation of an evidence-based implementation and sustainability toolkit used by health care clinicians seeking to implement EBPs. For this project, implementation science and EBP experts created initial iterations of the toolkit based on Rogers' change theory, the Advancing Research through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model, and phases and strategies from implementation science. Face validity and end-user feedback were obtained after piloting the tool with health care clinicians participating in immersive EBP sessions. The toolkit was then modified, with subsequent content validity and usability evaluations conducted among implementation science experts and health care clinicians. This article presents the newly updated Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for health care settings. Nurse leaders seeking to implement EBPs may benefit from an evidence-based toolkit to provide a science-informed approach to implementation and sustainability of practice changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35640,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Routine implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into health care is often the most difficult stage in the change process. Despite major advances in implementation science and quality improvement, a persistent 13- to 15-year research-to-practice gap remains. Nurse leaders may benefit from tools to support implementation that are based on scientific evidence and can be readily integrated into complex health care settings. This article describes development and evaluation of an evidence-based implementation and sustainability toolkit used by health care clinicians seeking to implement EBPs. For this project, implementation science and EBP experts created initial iterations of the toolkit based on Rogers' change theory, the Advancing Research through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model, and phases and strategies from implementation science. Face validity and end-user feedback were obtained after piloting the tool with health care clinicians participating in immersive EBP sessions. The toolkit was then modified, with subsequent content validity and usability evaluations conducted among implementation science experts and health care clinicians. This article presents the newly updated Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for health care settings. Nurse leaders seeking to implement EBPs may benefit from an evidence-based toolkit to provide a science-informed approach to implementation and sustainability of practice changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富尔德研究所基于证据的卫生保健实施和可持续性工具包的开发和评估。
在卫生保健中常规实施和可持续性循证实践(ebp)往往是变革过程中最困难的阶段。尽管在实施科学和质量改进方面取得了重大进展,但从研究到实践的差距仍然存在13至15年。护士领导可以从支持实施的工具中受益,这些工具基于科学证据,可以很容易地融入复杂的卫生保健环境。本文描述了寻求实施ebp的医疗保健临床医生使用的基于证据的实施和可持续性工具包的开发和评估。对于这个项目,实现科学和EBP专家基于Rogers的变更理论、通过密切合作推进研究(ARCC)模型以及实现科学的阶段和策略创建了工具包的初始迭代。在参与沉浸式EBP会议的医疗保健临床医生试用该工具后,获得了面部效度和最终用户反馈。然后对工具包进行修改,随后在实施科学专家和卫生保健临床医生之间进行内容有效性和可用性评估。本文介绍了最新更新的富尔德研究所基于证据的实施和可持续性工具包,用于医疗保健设置。寻求实施ebp的护士领导可以从基于证据的工具包中受益,该工具包为实践变化的实施和可持续性提供了科学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Nursing Administration Quarterly Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing Administration Quarterly (NAQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides nursing administrators with practical, up-to-date information on the effective management of nursing services in all health care settings. Published 4 times per year, each issue focuses on a selected topic providing an in depth look at the many aspects of nursing administration.
期刊最新文献
Advancing the Art and Science of Professional Nursing Practice With the Virtually Integrated CareSM Model. Beyond the Basics: Partnerships and Innovations for Empowerment to Address Workplace Violence, a Call to Action. Centralized Scheduling of Nursing Staff: A Rapid Review of the Literature. Clinician Wellbeing and Mental Health Assessment Across Two Acute Care Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. COVID-19 Stressors and Resilience Among Nurse Leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1