Blood and body fluids exposure, post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in northern Nigeria.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV Research & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-04
Zubairu Iliyasu, Musa Babashani, Khadija Dantata, Shaheed A Zakariyyah, Muktar A Gadanya, Humayra A Bashir, Auwalu U Gajida, Muktar H Aliyu
{"title":"Blood and body fluids exposure, post-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in northern Nigeria.","authors":"Zubairu Iliyasu,&nbsp;Musa Babashani,&nbsp;Khadija Dantata,&nbsp;Shaheed A Zakariyyah,&nbsp;Muktar A Gadanya,&nbsp;Humayra A Bashir,&nbsp;Auwalu U Gajida,&nbsp;Muktar H Aliyu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In high-HIV burden settings, such as Nigeria, HIV self-testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are often recommended, but not widely practiced. This study aims to identify the predictors of PEP utilization and preferences for HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 403 healthcare workers from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria completed questionnaires. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the respondents, 141 (35.0%) reported experiencing at least one workplace exposure incident, with 72 (51.1%) of them receiving PEP. The majority of healthcare workers (<i>n</i> = 354, 87.8%) expressed a preference for HIV self-testing over traditional HIV testing and counseling. The occurrence of exposure incidents was predicted by the respondent's sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.08, female vs. male), age (aOR = 0. 16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.92, >40 vs. <30 years), profession (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.18-4.66, nurse/midwife vs. physician), work unit (aOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.23, obstetrics/gynecology vs. surgery), and previous HIV testing and counseling (aOR = 0.01; 95% Cl: 0.004-0.03, no vs. yes). Respondent's profession, work unit, and previous HIV testing and counseling independently predicted a preference for HIV self-testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further exploration of the feasibility of implementing HIV self-testing as an alternative to traditional HIV testing and counseling for workplace exposures is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"2256063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In high-HIV burden settings, such as Nigeria, HIV self-testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are often recommended, but not widely practiced. This study aims to identify the predictors of PEP utilization and preferences for HIV self-testing among healthcare workers in Nigeria.

Methods: A total of 403 healthcare workers from a tertiary hospital in Nigeria completed questionnaires. Adjusted odds ratios were derived from logistic regression models.

Results: Among the respondents, 141 (35.0%) reported experiencing at least one workplace exposure incident, with 72 (51.1%) of them receiving PEP. The majority of healthcare workers (n = 354, 87.8%) expressed a preference for HIV self-testing over traditional HIV testing and counseling. The occurrence of exposure incidents was predicted by the respondent's sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.08, female vs. male), age (aOR = 0. 16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.92, >40 vs. <30 years), profession (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.18-4.66, nurse/midwife vs. physician), work unit (aOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02-0.23, obstetrics/gynecology vs. surgery), and previous HIV testing and counseling (aOR = 0.01; 95% Cl: 0.004-0.03, no vs. yes). Respondent's profession, work unit, and previous HIV testing and counseling independently predicted a preference for HIV self-testing.

Conclusion: Further exploration of the feasibility of implementing HIV self-testing as an alternative to traditional HIV testing and counseling for workplace exposures is warranted.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚北部卫生保健工作者的血液和体液接触、接触后预防和艾滋病毒自我检测。
在艾滋病毒高负担环境中,如尼日利亚,艾滋病毒自我检测和暴露后预防(PEP)通常被推荐,但并未广泛实施。本研究旨在确定尼日利亚卫生保健工作者PEP使用和艾滋病毒自我检测偏好的预测因素。方法:对尼日利亚某三级医院403名医护人员进行问卷调查。调整后的优势比来自逻辑回归模型。结果:在受访者中,141人(35.0%)报告至少经历过一次工作场所暴露事件,其中72人(51.1%)接受过PEP。大多数医护人员(n = 3554, 87.8%)表示,与传统的艾滋病毒检测和咨询相比,他们更倾向于进行艾滋病毒自我检测。暴露事件的发生可由被调查者的性别预测(调整后优势比[aOR] = 1.25;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.15-3.08,女性vs.男性),年龄(aOR = 0。16;95% CI: 0.03-0.92, >40 vs.结论:有必要进一步探索实施艾滋病毒自我检测作为传统艾滋病毒检测和工作场所暴露咨询的替代方案的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Alcohol use disorder, antiretroviral therapyBivariate associations of AIDS risk (measured via CD4 count) and mean adherence, and oral health in Peruvian MSM living with HIV. Markers of gut permeability, systemic inflammation and insulin resistance in people living with HIV in rural South Africa. Acute kidney and liver injury requiring hemodialysis following cathinone use in a person with HIV. Impact of analytical treatment interruptions on sexual behaviors: a mixed-methods longitudinal study of women enrolled in an HIV cure-related trial in Durban, South Africa. Pilot outcomes of a telehealth model for youth PrEP (TelePrEP) among youth at risk for HIV in Colorado.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1