Improvement of hedonic perception of odors as a marker of treatment response to escitalopram: olfactory changes through an open-label antidepressant trial.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-17 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3107
François Kazour, Boriana Atanasova, Thomas Desmidt, Valérie Gissot, Apolline Lefevre, Vincent Camus, Catherine Belzung, Wissam El-Hage
{"title":"Improvement of hedonic perception of odors as a marker of treatment response to escitalopram: olfactory changes through an open-label antidepressant trial.","authors":"François Kazour, Boriana Atanasova, Thomas Desmidt, Valérie Gissot, Apolline Lefevre, Vincent Camus, Catherine Belzung, Wissam El-Hage","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess olfactory functions (threshold, identification, and hedonic valence) of depressed subjects before and after an 8-week trial of escitalopram and compare the results of responders and nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two depressed subjects were recruited. Participants received escitalopram and were evaluated at two visits: baseline (V0) and week 8 (V8). They were categorized as responders (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score reduction of > 50%) or nonresponders to treatment. Participants were evaluated with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) at V0 and, at V0 and V8, completed psychometric and olfactory assessments, including MADRS and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), as well as the Sniffin' Sticks® test (threshold and identification tasks). The hedonic valence of smell was assessed on a 10-cm linear scale after presenting two pleasant and two unpleasant odors. Forty-three participants completed the study (24 responders and 19 nonresponders). The Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare olfactory, clinical, and demographic variables between groups and within the same group at V0 and V8. The Spearman coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between clinical characteristics and olfactory variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hedonic score of pleasant odors increased significantly between V0 and V8 only for responders (V = 61.5, p = 0.018), with no significant change in nonresponders (V = 90.5, p = 0.879). Comparison of olfactory performances between groups at V0 and V8 separately did not show a significant difference between responders and nonresponders to escitalopram. Olfactory threshold and identification scores were not different between V0 and V8 for responders or nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Depressed subjects have olfactory anhedonia, which appears to regress following a positive antidepressant response. Hedonic valence may be an indicator of cognitive changes associated with depression; improvement of this valence may indicate a clinical response to antidepressants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess olfactory functions (threshold, identification, and hedonic valence) of depressed subjects before and after an 8-week trial of escitalopram and compare the results of responders and nonresponders.

Methods: Fifty-two depressed subjects were recruited. Participants received escitalopram and were evaluated at two visits: baseline (V0) and week 8 (V8). They were categorized as responders (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score reduction of > 50%) or nonresponders to treatment. Participants were evaluated with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) at V0 and, at V0 and V8, completed psychometric and olfactory assessments, including MADRS and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), as well as the Sniffin' Sticks® test (threshold and identification tasks). The hedonic valence of smell was assessed on a 10-cm linear scale after presenting two pleasant and two unpleasant odors. Forty-three participants completed the study (24 responders and 19 nonresponders). The Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare olfactory, clinical, and demographic variables between groups and within the same group at V0 and V8. The Spearman coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between clinical characteristics and olfactory variables.

Results: The hedonic score of pleasant odors increased significantly between V0 and V8 only for responders (V = 61.5, p = 0.018), with no significant change in nonresponders (V = 90.5, p = 0.879). Comparison of olfactory performances between groups at V0 and V8 separately did not show a significant difference between responders and nonresponders to escitalopram. Olfactory threshold and identification scores were not different between V0 and V8 for responders or nonresponders.

Conclusion: Depressed subjects have olfactory anhedonia, which appears to regress following a positive antidepressant response. Hedonic valence may be an indicator of cognitive changes associated with depression; improvement of this valence may indicate a clinical response to antidepressants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善对气味的享乐感知作为艾司西酞普兰治疗反应的标志--通过开放标签抗抑郁试验实现嗅觉变化。
本研究旨在评估抑郁症受试者在接受为期 8 周的艾司西酞普兰试验前后的嗅觉功能(阈值、识别和享乐价值),并比较对抗抑郁药有反应者和无反应者的结果。研究人员招募了 52 名抑郁症患者。受试者在接受艾司西酞普兰治疗后,分别在基线(V0)和第8周(V8)进行了两次评估。他们被分为对治疗有反应者(MADRS评分减少>50%)和无反应者。参与者在 V0 期接受了 MINI 评估,并在 V0 期和 V8 期接受了心理测量和嗅觉评估,包括 MADRS 和 STAI 量表,以及用于阈值和识别测试的 "嗅觉棒"。在呈现 2 种令人愉快和 2 种令人不愉快的气味后,用 10 厘米线性量表对嗅觉的享乐价值进行评估。43 名参与者完成了研究(24 名应答者和 19 名非应答者)。曼-惠特尼检验、卡方检验和费雪精确检验用于比较各组之间以及同组内部在 V0 和 V8 时的嗅觉、临床和人口统计学变量。斯皮尔曼系数用于计算临床特征与嗅觉变量之间的相关性。在 V0 和 V8 期間,只有有反應者的怡人氣味 Hedonic 分數顯著增加(V = 61.5,p = 0.018),而無反應者組別則沒有顯著變化(V = 90.5,p = 0.879)。比较各组在 V0 和 V8 时的嗅觉表现,未发现对艾司西酞普兰有反应者和无反应者之间有明显差异。有反应者和无反应者的嗅觉阈值和识别分数在 V0 和 V8 之间没有差异。抑郁症患者的嗅觉失调会在抗抑郁药物产生积极反应后消失。享乐情价可能是与抑郁症相关的认知变化的指标。这种价值感的改善可能预示着对抗抑郁药物的临床反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
期刊最新文献
Download to Heal: Navigating the Pixelated Path of Digital Therapeutics in Psychiatric Care. Mental health predictors of Internet Gaming Disorder: a longitudinal study. Narrative therapy online intervention improves post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, perceived stress, anxiety, and depression in nurses: A randomized controlled trial. Parenthood and All-cause Mortality in Older Adults with Schizophrenia: A Multicenter 5-Year Prospective Study. Effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with nutritional counseling therapy on binge eating disorder symptoms: A randomized pilot trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1