Association between Legionella urinary antigen tests on admission and inhospital mortality in patients with atypical pneumonia: A nationwide database study.

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Mycobacteriology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_135_23
Masayuki Endo, Taisuke Jo, Takaaki Konishi, Ryosuke Kumazawa, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Association between <i>Legionella</i> urinary antigen tests on admission and inhospital mortality in patients with atypical pneumonia: A nationwide database study.","authors":"Masayuki Endo, Taisuke Jo, Takaaki Konishi, Ryosuke Kumazawa, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_135_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The guidelines for the requirement of Legionella urinary antigen tests on admission for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia differ in Japan, the United States, and Europe. We aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of Legionella urinary antigen testing and inhospital mortality in patients with atypical pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 654,708 patients with atypical pneumonia from July 2010 to March 2021 using the Japanese national inpatient database. The patients were divided into groups that underwent Legionella urinary antigen tests on the day of admission (test group, n = 229,649) and those that underwent testing after the day of admission or were untested (control group, n = 425,059). A propensity score-stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to compare inhospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) or differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tested group had a significantly lower 30-day inhospital mortality than that of the control group (7.7% vs. 9.0%; OR: 0.83 [95% CIs, 0.81-0.86]). The tested group also had a significantly shorter length of stay (difference, -2.3 [-2.6 to - 2.0] days and total hospitalization costs (-396 [-508 to - 285] US dollars) than that of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legionella urinary antigen testing upon admission is associated with better outcomes in patients with atypical pneumonia. Legionella urinary antigen testing performed on the day of admission is recommended for hospitalized patients with atypical pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":"12 3","pages":"350-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_135_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The guidelines for the requirement of Legionella urinary antigen tests on admission for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia differ in Japan, the United States, and Europe. We aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of Legionella urinary antigen testing and inhospital mortality in patients with atypical pneumonia.

Methods: We identified 654,708 patients with atypical pneumonia from July 2010 to March 2021 using the Japanese national inpatient database. The patients were divided into groups that underwent Legionella urinary antigen tests on the day of admission (test group, n = 229,649) and those that underwent testing after the day of admission or were untested (control group, n = 425,059). A propensity score-stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to compare inhospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) or differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using generalized linear models.

Results: The tested group had a significantly lower 30-day inhospital mortality than that of the control group (7.7% vs. 9.0%; OR: 0.83 [95% CIs, 0.81-0.86]). The tested group also had a significantly shorter length of stay (difference, -2.3 [-2.6 to - 2.0] days and total hospitalization costs (-396 [-508 to - 285] US dollars) than that of the control group.

Conclusions: Legionella urinary antigen testing upon admission is associated with better outcomes in patients with atypical pneumonia. Legionella urinary antigen testing performed on the day of admission is recommended for hospitalized patients with atypical pneumonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非典型肺炎患者入院时军团菌尿抗原检测与住院死亡率之间的关系:一项全国性数据库研究。
背景:日本、美国和欧洲对社区获得性肺炎住院患者入院时进行军团菌尿抗原检测的要求指南各不相同。我们旨在评估非典型肺炎患者进行军团菌尿抗原检测的时间与住院死亡率之间的关系。方法:我们使用日本国家住院数据库确定了2010年7月至2021年3月期间654708名非典型肺炎患者。将患者分为入院当天接受军团菌尿抗原检测的组(试验组,n=229649)和入院后接受检测或未经检测的组,对照组,n=425059)。进行倾向评分稳定的治疗逆概率加权分析,比较两组患者的住院死亡率、住院时间和总住院费用。使用广义线性模型计算比值比(or)或差异及其95%置信区间(CI)。结果:受试组的30天住院死亡率显著低于对照组(7.7%vs.9.0%;OR:0.83[95%CI,0.81-0.86])。受试组住院时间也显著短于对照组(差异为-2.3[-2.6-2.0]天,总住院费用为-396[-508-285]美元)。结论:非典型肺炎患者入院时进行军团菌尿抗原检测可获得更好的疗效。非典型肺炎住院患者建议在入院当天进行军团菌尿抗原检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Methods for the Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium leprae in the Leprosy Patients. Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Levels in Tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Prevalence and Temporal Trends of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in Iran from 1981 to 2023: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pyrazinamide-induced Hyperuricemia in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1