Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the clavicle level: A review.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-09-15 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.5582/ddt.2023.01005
Zhimin Guo, Ming Zhao, Haihua Shu
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block at the clavicle level: A review.","authors":"Zhimin Guo,&nbsp;Ming Zhao,&nbsp;Haihua Shu","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2023.01005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The supraclavicular block (SCB) and the infraclavicular block (ICB) are introduced to meet upper extremity surgery, where the transducer or the insertion point is placed superiorly and inferiorly at the approximate midpoint of the clavicle, respectively. These two approaches are highly appealing since they clearly exhibited each cord and its associated anatomy. In addition, it directed the needle accurately with real-time imaging by ultrasound guidance. Therefore, it brought higher success rates and fewer complications. Numerous trials have recently been conducted to examine the SCB and ICB regarding the new approach, injection techniques, block dynamics, and complication of hemidiaphragmatic paresis. It was found that both approaches could improve block effectiveness and postoperative analgesia for upper extremity surgery, according to recent studies at the level of the clavicular brachial plexus block. However, there is still a lack of work comparing the clinical performance and effectiveness of both approaches with ultrasonography. This review aims to outline the current available data from clinical trials along with case reports about these two approaches and to describe the findings published in the literature during the previous 5 years. Based on these findings, we attempt to determine whether there exists a one-size-fits-all approach that has the potential to meet upper extremity surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47494,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","volume":"17 4","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2023.01005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The supraclavicular block (SCB) and the infraclavicular block (ICB) are introduced to meet upper extremity surgery, where the transducer or the insertion point is placed superiorly and inferiorly at the approximate midpoint of the clavicle, respectively. These two approaches are highly appealing since they clearly exhibited each cord and its associated anatomy. In addition, it directed the needle accurately with real-time imaging by ultrasound guidance. Therefore, it brought higher success rates and fewer complications. Numerous trials have recently been conducted to examine the SCB and ICB regarding the new approach, injection techniques, block dynamics, and complication of hemidiaphragmatic paresis. It was found that both approaches could improve block effectiveness and postoperative analgesia for upper extremity surgery, according to recent studies at the level of the clavicular brachial plexus block. However, there is still a lack of work comparing the clinical performance and effectiveness of both approaches with ultrasonography. This review aims to outline the current available data from clinical trials along with case reports about these two approaches and to describe the findings published in the literature during the previous 5 years. Based on these findings, we attempt to determine whether there exists a one-size-fits-all approach that has the potential to meet upper extremity surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下锁骨水平臂丛神经阻滞:综述。
锁骨上阻滞(SCB)和锁骨下阻滞(ICB)用于上肢手术,其中换能器或插入点分别位于锁骨的大致中点的上方和下方。这两种方法非常吸引人,因为它们清楚地展示了每条脊髓及其相关的解剖结构。此外,它通过超声引导实时成像,精确地引导针头。因此,它带来了更高的成功率和更少的并发症。最近已经进行了大量的试验来检查SCB和ICB关于新方法、注射技术、阻滞动力学和半膈肌麻痹的并发症。根据最近在锁骨臂丛神经阻滞水平上的研究,发现这两种方法都可以提高上肢手术的阻滞效果和术后镇痛。然而,仍缺乏将两种方法的临床性能和有效性与超声进行比较的工作。这篇综述旨在概述当前临床试验的可用数据以及关于这两种方法的病例报告,并描述前5年发表在文献中的发现。基于这些发现,我们试图确定是否存在一种适用于上肢手术的一刀切的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Astaxanthin compound nutrient improved insulin resistance, hormone levels, embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Electrolytic-reduction ion water protects keratinocytes from hydrogen peroxide through radical scavenging activity and induction of AQP3 expression. A stroke patient with persistently intermittent fever treated with gabapentin: A clinical case. Effect of switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide on blood glucose and renal function. General selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [XⅢ]: Comparing the formulation characteristics of brand-name and generic bifonazole creams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1