Potential relevance of a motor skill “proficiency barrier” on health-related fitness in youth

T. Cade Abrams, Bryan M. Terlizzi, An De Meester, Ryan S. Sacko, J. Megan Irwin, Carlos Luz, Luís Paulo Rodrigues, Rita Cordovil, Vítor P. Lopes, Kirsten Schneider, David F. Stodden
{"title":"Potential relevance of a motor skill “proficiency barrier” on health-related fitness in youth","authors":"T. Cade Abrams,&nbsp;Bryan M. Terlizzi,&nbsp;An De Meester,&nbsp;Ryan S. Sacko,&nbsp;J. Megan Irwin,&nbsp;Carlos Luz,&nbsp;Luís Paulo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Rita Cordovil,&nbsp;Vítor P. Lopes,&nbsp;Kirsten Schneider,&nbsp;David F. Stodden","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2153300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigated the potential impact of a motor skill proficiency barrier on measures of cardiorespiratory (CRF) and musculoskeletal (MSF) fitness in youth. A sample of 241 youth (114 girls) aged 10 - 18 years, completed the Motor Competence Assessment battery with composite scores indexed according to age- and gender-adjusted percentile scores. Motor competence (MC) levels were categorized as low (≤ 25<sup>%tile</sup> – proficiency barrier), moderate (≥ 26<sup>%tile</sup> to &lt; 75<sup>%tile</sup>), and high (≥ 75<sup>%tile</sup>). CRF levels (Health Risk, Needs Improvement, and Healthy) were assessed using the Fitnessgram® 20 m PACER test. Low (≤ 20<sup>%tile</sup>), moderate (≥ 21<sup>%tile</sup> to ≤ 80<sup>%tile</sup>), and high (≥ 80<sup>%tile</sup>) MSF levels were assessed using grip strength normative data. Two 3 × 3 chi-square tests were conducted to determine the probability of MC level predicting CRF and MSF levels. Results demonstrated statistically significant models for performance on both the PACER (χ<sup>2</sup>[4, <i>N </i>= 241] = 22.65, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and grip strength (χ<sup>2</sup>[4, <i>N </i>= 241] = 23.95, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Strong evidence of a proficiency barrier impacting CRF was noted, as no low skilled youth met the “Healthy” fitness zone standards for PACER performance. Evidence supporting a barrier with grip strength was not as strong, as 20.8% of youth exhibiting low MC displayed high grip strength. However, all individuals with high levels of MC demonstrated at least moderate grip strength. Results emphasize the importance of developing MC during childhood as it may provide a protective effect against unhealthy CRF and MSF across youth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1771-1778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2153300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2153300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the potential impact of a motor skill proficiency barrier on measures of cardiorespiratory (CRF) and musculoskeletal (MSF) fitness in youth. A sample of 241 youth (114 girls) aged 10 - 18 years, completed the Motor Competence Assessment battery with composite scores indexed according to age- and gender-adjusted percentile scores. Motor competence (MC) levels were categorized as low (≤ 25%tile – proficiency barrier), moderate (≥ 26%tile to < 75%tile), and high (≥ 75%tile). CRF levels (Health Risk, Needs Improvement, and Healthy) were assessed using the Fitnessgram® 20 m PACER test. Low (≤ 20%tile), moderate (≥ 21%tile to ≤ 80%tile), and high (≥ 80%tile) MSF levels were assessed using grip strength normative data. Two 3 × 3 chi-square tests were conducted to determine the probability of MC level predicting CRF and MSF levels. Results demonstrated statistically significant models for performance on both the PACER (χ2[4, N = 241] = 22.65, p < .001) and grip strength (χ2[4, N = 241] = 23.95, p < .001). Strong evidence of a proficiency barrier impacting CRF was noted, as no low skilled youth met the “Healthy” fitness zone standards for PACER performance. Evidence supporting a barrier with grip strength was not as strong, as 20.8% of youth exhibiting low MC displayed high grip strength. However, all individuals with high levels of MC demonstrated at least moderate grip strength. Results emphasize the importance of developing MC during childhood as it may provide a protective effect against unhealthy CRF and MSF across youth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动技能“熟练程度障碍”与青少年健康相关健身的潜在相关性
本研究调查了运动技能熟练程度障碍对青少年心肺(CRF)和肌肉骨骼(MSF)健康测量的潜在影响。241名10 - 18岁的青少年(114名女孩)完成了运动能力评估,并根据年龄和性别调整的百分位数得分进行了综合得分索引。运动能力(MC)水平分为低(≤25%水平-熟练程度障碍)、中(≥26% - 75%水平)和高(≥75%水平)。使用Fitnessgram®20 m PACER测试评估CRF水平(健康风险、需求改善和健康)。低(≤20%瓦)、中等(≥21%瓦至≤80%瓦)和高(≥80%瓦)MSF水平使用握力标准数据进行评估。采用2个3 × 3卡方检验来确定MC水平预测CRF和MSF水平的概率。结果显示,PACER (χ2[4, N = 241] = 22.65, p < .001)和握力(χ2[4, N = 241] = 23.95, p < .001)的表现模型具有统计学意义。熟练程度障碍影响CRF的有力证据被注意到,因为没有低技能青年达到PACER表现的“健康”健身区标准。支持握力屏障的证据并不充分,20.8%的低MC青年表现出高握力。然而,所有具有高MC水平的个体都表现出至少中等的握力。结果强调了在童年时期发展MC的重要性,因为它可能对青少年不健康的CRF和MSF提供保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Remote-Based Brain Endurance Training Enhances Bench Press, Preacher Curl, and Jump Squat Performance in Recreational Athletes. Safe Sport in Mediterranean Contexts: Cultural Logics of Harm, Silence, and Authority. Warming Up Body and Mind: Combined Cognitive and Exercise Priming Improves 1-Mile Time Trial Performance in Recreational Runners. The Influence of Short-Term, Severe Low Energy Availability With Varying Protein Content on Substrate Metabolism, High-Intensity Exercise Performance and Subjective Responses in Young Adults. Visual Behavior in Inline Speed Skating: An Eye-Tracking Evaluation for Performance Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1